nahid shahveisi; shabnam shahveisi
Abstract
Objective: Literature reviews have a special role and place among researches and their value will increase when the researcher critically examines and analyzes related sources. Therefore, the purpose of the current research is to critically review the studies and identify the most important topics and ...
Read More
Objective: Literature reviews have a special role and place among researches and their value will increase when the researcher critically examines and analyzes related sources. Therefore, the purpose of the current research is to critically review the studies and identify the most important topics and criteria that have been investigated literature reviewMethods: The method of this research is library-documents which has been used to review and analyze the sources and studies by using a systematic review and with a critical analysis approach. Results: In the category of theoretical foundations of literature reviews, one of the merits of the studies is that they have explained the importance, benefits and functions of the literature review, but due to the lack of comprehensibility of the guides, the lack of explanation of the research problem and the presentation of unrelated materials, they have caused confusion to the audience. In the category of literature review evaluation criteria, researches have given researchers the possibility to examine past sources and studies with a deeper perspective by formulating criteria for literature reviews, but these criteria are also sometimes for obvious reasons and the incomprehensibility has brought problems for researchers and in the category of critical analysis of literature reviewsConclusion: The results show that the researches have paid little attention to the discussion of critical analysis in the Literature reviews and this shows that the researchers have approached this issue with a superficial perspective and have not penetrated deep into the sources and texts of Literature reviews
Yaghob Nowrozi; Mohammad Maleki; Eisa Zarei
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the library software of Pars Azarakhsh, Simorgh, and Saman in terms of information retrieval features in the web environment. The present study is applied type. The statistical population consists of Pars Azarakhsh, Simorgh, and Saman library software. To measure, ...
Read More
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the library software of Pars Azarakhsh, Simorgh, and Saman in terms of information retrieval features in the web environment. The present study is applied type. The statistical population consists of Pars Azarakhsh, Simorgh, and Saman library software. To measure, review, identify and evaluate the dimensions of the research, the status of library software in 5 indicators was reviewed and analyzed. The data of this research were collected by observing the software website and using the opinions of the software experts and were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods. Findings showed that in the field of search capabilities in various fields, Pars Azarakhsh with 98.85% points, and Saman and Simorgh with 96.55% points obtained the highest and lowest scores. In the section of various search formulations, Simorgh and Pars Azarakhsh with 100% points and Saman software with 83.34% points obtained the highest and lowest scores. In other types of software searches, Pars Azarakhsh with 78.43% points, and Saman software with 76.97% points had the highest and lowest points. The results also showed that the studied software, in terms of retrieval and information retrieval features in the web environment, had good improvements over their previous versions and were able to meet more than 80% of the criteria studied in this study.
