Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Information Science and Knowledge, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Ph.D. Student in Information Science and Knowledge, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of the current research is to draw and analyze the intellectual structure and evolution of knowledge in the field of RDF with the method of co-occurrence analysis of words and clustering of concepts and events in this field. This is an applied research that was carried out with a scientometric approach. The statistical population of this research includes all the researches conducted in the field of RDF in the Web of Science database from 1998-2021. Also, the data collection tool in this research is note-taking and the data analysis tool is co-occurrence analysis of words and network analysis using Vosviewer, Netdrow, SPSS and Bibexecl software. The findings of the research showed that the keywords RDF, Semantic web, Ontology, linked data and SPARQL are the most frequent words and the keywords RDF* semantic web, RDF* Academic Ontology and RDF* SPARQL are the most frequent word pairs. Also, the co-occurrence analysis of words network includes six clusters named "data model scalability", "RDF representation of bibliographic entities and relations", "ontology alignment", "semantic web and linked data", "data management and publishing" and "data mining". In addition, the network density is equal to 0.068, which is not in a favorable condition. The clusters of "data model scalability", "ontology alignment", "data management and publishing" and "data mining" have not yet reached sufficient maturity and require a lot of follow-up and research in these fields. The results showed that the scientific productions of the RDF field, despite its upward publication trend, have more subject dispersion and are more oriented towards the semantic web, and the analysis of the co-occurrence network of words in this field also has a greater subject dispersion, which indicates the interest of researchers to various topics in this area.

1.Introduction

The abundance of publications in the field of Resource Description Framework (RDF) presents a challenge for researchers seeking a comprehensive understanding of the domain. RDF, a graph-based data model crucial to the Semantic Web, enables machine-readable data representation and interoperability across systems. The growing volume of RDF-related literature highlights the need for a structured analysis to identify key concepts, trends, and thematic evolution in this interdisciplinary field. Therefore, creating a scientific map of articles in the RDF field using the thesaurus method and presenting a strategic diagram will enhance awareness of published research status, illustrate topic relationships, identify influential topics, mature, emerging, and underdeveloped topics, thematic gaps, and establish sound scientific policies in the field. This study aims to map the intellectual structure and track the knowledge evolution in the RDF domain using scientometric approaches.

Research Question(s)

What has been the trend in scientific publications within the field of RDF from 1998 to 2021 in the Web of Science database?
How the frequency distribution of the most is commonly used keywords in RDF-related articles from 1900 to 2021?
What does the co-word network in the RDF domain look like during the period 1900 to 2021?
How are the co-word clusters in the RDF domain structured, and what are the thematic topics within each cluster from 1900 to 2021?
To what extent have the co-word clusters in the RDF domain matured over the period from 1900 to 2021

2.Literature Review

Previous studies have utilized co-word analysis in various domains such as digital libraries, military trauma, COVID-19, and knowledge management to reveal thematic structures and developmental trajectories. However, there is a gap in applying this approach specifically within the RDF domain. Studies by Alipour-Hafezi et al. (2017), Rezaeizadeh & KaramAli (2018), and Jin & Li (2019) demonstrate the effectiveness of scientometric techniques in visualizing knowledge structures, identifying research gaps, and tracing emergent topics. This study builds upon these methodological foundations to comprehensively explore the RDF field.

3.Methodology

This applied research employs a scientometric methodology grounded in co-word analysis. The dataset includes 1,271 scholarly articles published between 1998 and 2021 and indexed in the Web of Science database. Tools such as VOSviewer, Netdraw, SPSS, BibExcel, and UCINET were used to conduct word co-occurrence analysis, hierarchical clustering, and strategic diagramming. The analytical process involved keyword standardization, matrix generation, network visualization, and calculation of centrality and density indices for identified clusters.

4.Results

The research findings reveal that keywords such as RDF, Semantic Web, Ontology, Linked Data, and SPARQL are the most frequent, while word pairs like RDF* Semantic Web, RDF* Academic Ontology, and RDF* SPARQL are common. The co-occurrence analysis of the word network reveals six clusters named "data model scalability", "RDF representation of bibliographic entities and relations", "ontology alignment", "semantic web and linked data", "data management and publishing", and "data mining". The network density is 0.068, indicating a less favorable condition. Clusters like "data model scalability", "ontology alignment", "data management and publishing", and "data mining" are not yet mature and require further research.

5.Discussion

The findings suggest that while the RDF domain has seen an increase in publication volume, it still faces thematic fragmentation and limited interdisciplinary integration. High centrality in certain clusters indicates dominance, but low-density values suggest underdeveloped interrelations among concepts. This highlights the need for broader collaboration and diversification of research topics within RDF. The prevalence of semantic web topics reflects current research interests, while emerging areas like data scalability and ontology alignment require more attention.

6.Conclusion

This study offers a detailed intellectual mapping of the RDF field, highlighting dominant themes and emerging areas for further exploration. The low network density and dispersed thematic structure emphasize the need for increased interdisciplinary collaboration. Policymakers and researchers are encouraged to support studies in underdeveloped RDF subdomains to promote comprehensive scientific growth. The strategic insights provided by this analysis can guide future research priorities and contribute to the development of a cohesive knowledge structure within the RDF domain.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Ahmadi, H. (2025). Mohammad Hossein Shahriar in the Mirror of Scholarly Analysis: Co-Word Analysis. Journal of Knowledge-Research Studies. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.22034/jkrs.2025.65067.1127 [In Persian]
Ahmadi, H., & Bakhtiarian, I. (2023). Mapping and Analysis Knowledge Structure of Hawraman Research in Iran: A Co-word Analysis and Information Clustering. Journal of Knowledge-Research Studies, 2(3), 31-49. DOI: 10.22034/jkrs.2024.58983.1037 [In Persian]
Alipour-Hafezi, M., Ramezani, H., & Momeni, E.(2018). Knowledge map of digital libraries in Iran: a co-word analysis. Information Science and Technologe, 33 (2), 453-488.
DOI: 10.35050/JIPM010.2018.069 [In Persian]
Bigdeloo, E. (2024). Intellectual Structure of Knowledge in Information Retrieval: A Co-Word Analysis. Scientometrics Research Journal, 9(2), 269-296. DOI: 10.22070/rsci.2022.14569.1501[In Persian]
Callon, M., & Curtail, J., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-Word Analysis as a Tool for Describing the Network of Interactions between Basic and Technological Research:The Case of Polymer Chemistry. Scientometrics, 22 (1), 155-205. DOI:10.1007/BF02019280
Callon, M., Low, J., & Rip, A. (1986). Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. London: Macmillan.
Danesh F., (2020). Knowledge Organization Discovering & Visualizing Prominent Patterns, Hidden Relationships & Subjects Trends. Information Science and Technologe, 36 (2), 469-500. DOI: 10.35050/JIPM010.2020.008 [In Persian]
Hosseini, E., Ghaebi, A., & Baradar, R. (2021). Bibliometrics and Mapping of Co-words in the Field of Linked Data. Scientometrics Research Journal, 7(13), 91-116. DOI: 10.22070/rsci.2020.4904.1333 [In Persian]
Jabbari, L., & Jafari, S. (2020). Analysis of Research perspective, knowledge map, and co-author patterns of COVID19 Studies. Popularization of Science, 11(1), 123-144. DOR: 20.1001.1.22519033.1399.11.1.6.5 [In Persian]
Jin, Y., & Li, X. (2019). Visualizing the hotspots and emerging trends of multimedia big data through scientometrics. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(2), 1289-1313. DOI:10.1007/s11042-018-6172-5
Jin, Y., Li, X., Campbell, R.I., & Ji, S. (2018). Visualizing the hotspots and emerging trends of 3D printing through scientometrics. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 24 (5), 801-812. DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-05-2017-0100
Kameli, B., Yazdani, H., hakim, A., & Jafari, S. (2021). Mapping and Clustering of Knowledge Management Research Based on Co-Word Analysis of Articles Indexed in Web of Science (WoS) Website. Innovation Management in Defensive Organizations, 3(4), 77-104. DOI: 10.22034/qjimdo.2020.227052.1295 [In Persian]
Khasseh, A., Mousavi Chelak, A., Mokhtari, H., & Khosravi LoheSara, M. (2024). Co-Authorship and Co-Word Analyses of Curriculum Management and Planning Research in Iran during 2010-2019. Higher Education Letter, 17(66), 1-20. DOI: 10.22034/hel.2024.545460.1773 [In Persian]
Kim, M.C., & Chen, C. (2015). A scientometric review of emerging trends and new developments in recommendation systems. Scientometrics. 104(1), 239-263. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1595-5
Liu, G.Y., Hu, J.M., & Wang, H.L. (2012). A co-word analysis of digital library field in China. Scientometrics91(1), 203-217. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0586-4
Meskarpour Amiri, M., Nasiri, T., Mehdizadeh, P. (2020). Subjects Clustering Analysis and Science Mapping on COVID-19 Researches in Scopus database. J Mil Med., 22 (6), 663-669. DOI: 10.30491/JMM.22.6.663[In Persian]
Quan, D., Karger, D., & Huynh, D. (2003). RDF authoring environments for end users. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Web Foundations and Application Technologies.
Raeeszadeh, M., Karamali, M. (2018). Scientific Mapping of Military Trauma Papers using Co-Word Analysis in MEDLINE. J Mil Med., 20 (5), 476-487. http://militarymedj.ir/article-1-1925-fa.html [In Persian]
Sharafi, A., Shaghaghi, A. (2021) Drawing the Scientific Collaboration Map of Intellectual Capital Field in the Web of Science. CJS., 8(2), 41-51. DOI: 10.22088/cjs.8.2.41 [In Persian]
Shen, S., Cheng, C., Yang, J., & Yang, S. (2018). Visualized analysis of developing trends and hot topics in natural disaster research. PloS one, 13(1), 1-15. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191250
Small, H., & Griffith, B.C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4(1), 14-40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/284546
Soheili, F., Khasseh, A.A., Rostami, M., & Zarean, M.J. (2023). Thematic Map of Moral Education Studies Indexed in Web of Science 2000_2018. Scientometrics Research Journal, 9(1), 169-188. DOI: 10.22070/rsci.2021.5818.1433[In Persian]
Turner, W.A., & Rojouan, F. (1991). Evaluating input /output relationships in a regional research network using co-word analysis. Scientomerics, 22 (1), 139-154. DOI: 10.1007/BF02019279
Van Nunen, K., Li, J., Reniers, G., & Ponnet, K. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research. Safety Science108, 248-258. DOI:‏ 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.011
Whittaker, J. (1989) Creativity and Conformity in Science: Titles, Keywords and Co-word Analysis. Social Studies of Science, 19, 473-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003004
Wu, Y., Wang, Z., & Lu, Y. (2023). Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurial research themes in China: a combination analysis of co-word and critical event. Asia Pacific Journal of Management40(3), 1133-1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09815-y
Zhu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Co-word analysis method based on meta-path of subject knowledge network. Scientometrics, 23(2), 237-264. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03400-0