Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

2 M.Sc. of Knowledge and Information Science, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran

3 M.Sc. of Knowledge and Information Science, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

Abstract

Introduction

The management of digital resources in national libraries involves significant challenges, particularly in selecting, maintaining, and ensuring long-term accessibility. A crucial element in this process is the storage format of digital resources, which directly affects both the preservation of materials and their usability over time. Below are key reasons why the choice of resource storage formats is important for national libraries:

Long-Term Preservation: National libraries manage vast collections of digital materials, from texts to multimedia resources. Choosing a storage format that ensures long-term preservation is essential to prevent data loss over time due to format obsolescence. National Libraries often face challenges of format obsolescence. The right choice of format can minimize the need for complex emulation or migration strategies, which are resource-intensive.
Interoperability and Accessibility: Digital collections in national libraries need to be accessible across various platforms, devices, and operating systems. International standards and guidelines, such as those from the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA), guide the choice of formats that facilitate interoperability. Adopting these standards ensures that digital resources are accessible not only to national users but also internationally. This is especially important for cultural heritage materials that may be used globally.
Efficiency in Storage and Retrieval: When dealing with large-scale collections, efficient storage formats help minimize infrastructure costs. The speed at which data can be retrieved from a storage system is influenced by the format of the resources. Formats that are optimized for efficient access improve search and retrieval times, facilitating quick access to resources for users.
Metadata Preservation and Integration: National libraries depend heavily on metadata to ensure that digital objects are easily discoverable and appropriately categorized. Standardized formats are crucial for integrating digital collections with national library cataloging systems and facilitating interoperability between different systems. National libraries must ensure that the digital resources they store are secure and protected from corruption.
User Experience and Engagement: National libraries serve diverse audiences, ranging from academic researchers to the general public. Formats that are easily navigable (e.g., HTML or EPUB for e-books) improve user engagement and accessibility. Interactive or multimedia content (e.g., video, audio) in open formats can provide richer, more engaging experiences. Formats like Unicode-based text formats (e.g., UTF-8) allow for the preservation of multiple languages and scripts, making national library collections accessible to diverse communities, including those with specific linguistic or cultural needs.
Legal and Copyright Considerations: Formats may also play a role in how digital rights and licensing information are embedded and protected. Open formats allow for the inclusion of rights management information without reliance on proprietary systems, ensuring proper management of copyrighted materials. The use of appropriate formats for the digital storage of copyrighted content can aid in enforcing digital rights management (DRM) policies. Formats like encrypted PDF or DRM-protected EPUB help libraries protect content according to legal guidelines.
Cost-Effectiveness: Choosing the right storage formats can have a significant impact on cost management for national libraries. Open-source and standardized formats tend to be cost-effective compared to proprietary systems that may involve licensing fees, additional maintenance costs, or vendor lock-in. National Libraries must invest in ensuring the longevity and accessibility of their digital collections. By choosing widely accepted formats with strong community support, national libraries can reduce ongoing maintenance and conversion costs associated with less popular or proprietary formats.

So, the importance of selecting the right resource storage formats in national libraries cannot be overstated. A well-chosen format ensures the long-term preservation, accessibility, and efficient management of digital collections. It also contributes to the overall mission of national libraries to serve as custodians of cultural heritage, making materials accessible to a global audience while protecting them for future generations. Standardized, open, and widely supported formats are crucial in meeting these objectives, enabling national libraries to optimize their digital storage solutions while maintaining flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and long-term sustainability.

Literature Review

The results of Sullivan (2006), Thomas & Martin (2006), Hodge & Anderson (2007), Rog & Van Wijk (2008), Van der Knijff (2011), Barabucci & et al (2011), Morrissey (2012), Hajtnik (2012), Jackson (2012), Koo & Chou(2013), Rimkus & et al(2014), Uherek & et al (2015), Termens & et al (2015), Delaney & De Jong(2015), Baratè & et al (2015), Rimkus & Witmer (2016), Anyim (2021), Trianggoro & Prasetyadi (2022) research showed selecting the right format and storage standard for digital collections is a multi-faceted decision that balances accessibility, preservation, interoperability, and user experience. Ensuring that digital collections are presented in a way that aligns with these standards maximizes their utility and longevity. It highlights that while digital libraries have evolved from physical spaces, the principles and practices of resource storage have undergone significant changes. Previous research has addressed these issues, but often as sub-components rather than focusing on them comprehensively. The review indicates that long-term preservation and storage have not been fully explored in the literature.This research aims to identify successful national solutions for preserving and storing resources effectively in digital libraries. In essence, the study seeks to provide a more integrated approach to addressing storage and preservation issues in digital libraries, taking into account both the technological and organizational practices in use today. This effort is important for ensuring that digital resources remain accessible and usable over time, despite the challenges posed by rapid technological change and shifting formats.

Methodology

This article identifies the use of a variety of standard formats for storing video, text, multimedia, and audio resources in the digital collections of 20 selected national libraries around the world. This study is applied, based on the descriptive-analytical method. For data collection, we used a researcher-made questionnaire. After collecting data, a variety of descriptive statistical techniques such as frequency distribution and frequency percentage and Chi-square test were used to analyze the data.

Results

Based on the results, it was found that image sources were used in all studied collections and cultural objects were less popular with a share of 41%, for TIFF image sources (94%); HTML and XML text sources (75%); WAV audio sources (65%) and AVI multimedia sources (65%) were the most common. Switzerland had the greatest variety in the use of a variety of standards. Also, among the research community, Iran, Britain, the United States, Scotland, Qatar, the Netherlands, France, and Spain had the greatest diversity in storing a variety of digital resources. The statistical community was consistent in using standard formats for a variety of visual, textual, and multimedia resources and followed a similar pattern in selecting storage formats.

Conclusion

The research community had the least amount of diversity of use in the field of multimedia resource storage. Research findings emphasize the use of EPUB for ease of reading books on e-readers, and GP3 was recommended to increase the usability of the mobile version of the digital library, WARC as a special format for web archiving, for long-term protection of digital content of national libraries, because these three formats had the lowest usage in the statistical community.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Michael Day (Digital Preservation Research Lead) at the National Library of Great Britain for her guidance and sharing of scholarly expertise.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Adetayo, A. J., Otuyalo, M. A., & Makinde, B. O. (2025). Digital Engagement in Academic Libraries: An Analysis of Short Video Platforms and Student Satisfaction. In Impact of Digitalization on Communication Dynamics (pp. 77-98). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Allegrezza, S. (2024). File formats conversion issues in digital libraries. In IRCDL (pp. 203-211). UniMC Pubblicazioni Aperte Digitali
Alipour-Hafezi, M., Horri, A., Shiri, A., & Ghaebi, A. (2013). Digital library interoperability: Proposing a model. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 11(1), 57-75.
Alipour-Hafezi, M., Radfar, H., Rasouli, B., Nabavi, M., HajiZeinolabedin, M., Dehnad, A., & Nemati-Anaraki, L. (2020). Status of Central Libraries at Iranian Universities of Medical Sciences for Joining an Integrated Network of Medical Libraries. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 18(2), 173-187.
Allegrezza, S. (2016). Nuove prospettive per il Web archiving: gli standard ISO 28500 (formato WARC) e ISO/TR 14873 sulla qualità del Web archiving. DigItalia2015, 49-61.
Anyim, W. O. (2021). Relevance of Electronic Resources and Improvement of Access for Effective Distance Learning and Continuing Education Programme. International Journal of Asian Education, 2(1), 52-63.
Barabucci, G., Palmirani, M., Vitali, F., & Cervone, L. (2011, August). Long-term preservation of legal resources. In International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective (pp. 78-93). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Baratè, A., Ludovico, L. A., & Haus, G. (2015). Integration of audio resources into a digital library: The BEIC case study. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10(2), 48-57.
Delaney, B., & De Jong, A. (2015). Media archives and digital preservation: overcoming cultural barriers. New Review of Information Networking, 20(1-2), 73-89.
Dhiren, P., & Jignesh, A. (2017). Developing Video Archive Library Using Omeka: An Open Source Digital Library Management System. [On line], Available: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/31595 [Accessed 26 Aug 2020].
Hajtnik, T. (2012). Analiza primernosti formata PDF/A za dolgorocno hrambo gradiva v digitalni obliki. Arhivi, 35(1), 157.
Hodge, G., & Anderson, N. (2007). Formats for digital preservation: A review of alternatives and issues. Information services & use, 27(1-2), 45-63.
Jackson, A. N. (2012). Formats over time: Exploring UK web history. arXiv preprint arXiv:1210.1714.
Jones, M., & Beagrie, N. (2015). Digital preservation handbook, 2nd Edition. London: British Library; DPC.
Kalita, B., & Saikia, R. R. (2011). Prospects of digitizing manuscript collections in KKH library: a model. [On line], Available:http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/dxml/handle/1944/1627. [Accessed 8 Aug 2020].
Koo, J., & Chou, C. C. (2013). PDF to PDF/a: evaluation of converter software for implementation in digital repository workflow. New review of information networking, 18(1), 1-15.
Morrissey, S. M. (2012, January). The network is the format: PDF and the long-term use of digital content. In Archiving Conference (pp. 200-203). Society for Imaging Science and Technology.
Psohlavec, S. (2006). Digitization of Old Manuscripts: A Technical Point of View. [on-line], Available: http://Digit. nkp.cz/stp.htm. [Accessed 26 Aug 2021].
Oliveira, A. F. D., & Cunha, M. B. D. (2024). COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT IN DIGITAL COLLECTIONS. RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 17, e019025.
Rimkus, K. R., & Witmer, S. D. (2016, October). Identifying Barriers to File Rendering In Bit-level Preservation Repositories: A Preliminary Approach. International Conference on Digital Preservation (iPres) 2016.
Rimkus, K., Padilla, T., Popp, T., & Martin, G. (2014). Digital preservation file format policies of ARL member libraries: an analysis. D-Lib Magazine, 20(3/4).
Rog, J., & Van Wijk, C. (2008). Evaluating file formats for long-term preservation. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 24(1), 83-90.
Sullivan, S. J. (2006). An archival/records management perspective on PDF/A. Records Management Journal., 9(2), 123-138.
Termens, M., Ribera, M., & Locher, A. (2015). An analysis of file format control in institutional repositories. Library Hi Tech., 33(2), 162-174.
Thomas, S., & Martin, J. (2006). Using the papers of contemporary British politicians as a testbed for the preservation of digital personal archives. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 27(1), 29-56.
Tiurmenko, I., Bozhuk, L., Struk, I., & Syerov, Y. (2022). Digital Documentary Collections of National Cultural Heritage on the Ukrainian Regional State Archives Websites. In Developments in Information & Knowledge Management for Business Applications (pp. 449-470). Springer, Cham.
Trianggoro, C., & Prasetyadi, A. (2022). Digital Preservation: Technical Aspects and Frameworks for Librarians. In Handbook of Research on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Librarianship (pp. 352-368). IGI Global.
Uherek, A., Maier, S., & Borghoff, U. M. (2015, February). Requirements for Long-Term Preservation of Digital Videos and First Experiments with an XMT-Based Approach. In International Conference on Computer Aided Systems Theory (pp. 203-210). Springer, Cham.
Ugodu, H. N., Ibenne, S. K., & Durodolu, O. O. (2025). Exploring the Impact and Challenges of Library Cooperative Storage Facilities and Resource Sharing in Modern Information Environments. In Building Inclusive Global Knowledge Societies for Sustainable Development (pp. 209-244). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Uraon, A., & Sinha, M. K. (2025). Preservation of Documentary Heritage Collections for Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Khuda Bakhsh Oriental Public Library, Patna. Library Progress International, 45(1), 61-71.
Van der Knijff, J. (2011). JPEG 2000 for Long-term Preservation: JP2 as a Preservation Format. D-Lib Magazine, 17(5), 4.
Witten, I. H., Bainbridge, D., & Nichols, D. M. (2009). How to build a digital library?. Burlington, Massachusetts: Morgan Kaufmann.
References [In Persian]
Aghababaie, V. (2014). A Survey of Digitization of Manuscripts Process in QOM libraries [Master’s thesis, University of Qom]. [In Persian]
GholamhosseinZadeh, Z. (2007). A survey of usage scope from information technology in storage and retrieval of manuscripts in the libraries of Iran. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization, 17(4), 13-28. [In Persian]
Hakimzadeh, R., & Fahimifar, S. (2017). Archival documents digitization policies: Developing a proposal checklist for documents digitization in Iranian archives. Library and Information Sciences, 20(4), 1-29. [In Persian]
Maher-al-Naghsh, B. (2006). A survey on methods of development of electronic information resources in digital libraries of Tehran city. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization, 17(2), 85-96. [In Persian]
Norouzi, Y., & Jafarifar, N. (2019). Using Standards (Case Study: Iranians Digital Libraries). Journal of Information Processing and Management (JIPM), 34 (2), 671-696. [In Persian]
Norouzi, Y., Gholami, T., & Jafarifar, N. (2018). What is the Situation of Iranian Digital Libraries after a Decade? National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization, 28(4), 147-170. [In Persian]
Norouzi, Y., Gholami, T., & Jafarifar, N. (2018). Iranian Digital Libraries. Tehran: book home. [In Persian]
Radfar, H. (2012). Survey of Collection Developement in Iranian Digital Libraries [Doctoral dissertation, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch]. [In Persian]
Rezaei Sharifabadi, S., Tajdaran, M., & Rasouli, Z. (2011). A Model for Managing Digital Pictures of the National Archives of Iran, Based on the Open Archival Information System Reference Model. Ganjine-ye Asnad, 21(3), 86-97. [In Persian]