Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Knowledge and Information Science Dept,,, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to identify the social media and their role in knowledge exchange between digital preservation experts based on the Honeycomb model for sharing scientific contents. Methodology: This was an analytical qualitative study that was conducted using the Delphi method through 15 open questions among 20 experts who were members of a professional digital preservation group with different cultural backgrounds including libraries, museums, and archives. Findings: The findings indicated that 25% of the experts used Facebook; 22% used LinkedIn; 20% used Foursquare ; 15% used WIKIs; 10% used YouTube; and 8% used Twitter, while no one (0%) was familiar with Research Gate, which is a social network dedicated to professionals. Hundred percent of experts used Facebook for regular information updates and efficiency enhancement, 90% used Facebook and YouTube for obtaining information, 90% used Facebook and LinkedIn for scheduling meetings and networking, and 100% of experts used LinkedIn and Facebook for knowledge exchange and sharing. Ninety percent of experts considered intellectual deviation on Facebook and YouTube as the disadvantages of social media in scientific research, while 10% regarded time waste and low efficiency in YouTube and Twitter as the disadvantage of social media. The advantages of being your own boss (time management, democracy) with 100% on Facebook, access to society with 90% on LinkedIn and Facebook, and data recovery with 90% on Facebook were reported by the experts. Of the 7 blocks of the Honeycomb model, sharing was 100% in Facebook and LinkedIn, presence was 90% in Foursquare, identity, communication, groups, and chats were 90% in Facebook and LinkedIn, and reputation was 90% in LinkedIn. Conclusion: Our results showed that key components of the Honeycomb model for social media can be used in knowledge exchange between experts through obtaining information, exchanging information, sharing knowledge, updating information, and meeting and networking practices in various fields of science. They can also be applied to understand the interactive needs and how these needs change over time. Social media form an essential part of daily professional communication in scientific research in Iran. Among the social media investigated in this study, Facebook and LinkedIn were most widely used in the 7 key components of the Honeycomb model.
 

Keywords

Bateman P.J; Gray, P.H. and Butler,B.S. (2010). "Research note –theimpact of community". Information Systems Research. 50(4):1-16. http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/isre.1090.0265?journalCode=isr
Butler, B.S. (2001). "Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: a resource-based model of online social structures". Information Systems Research. 12(4): 346-362
Constant, D., Kiesler, S. and Sproull, L. (1994). "What's mine is ours,or isit?A study of attitudes about information sharing".information systems Research.5(4):400-421.
Dellarocas,C(2005). "Reputation mechanism design in online trading environments with pure moral hazard".Information Systems Research. 16(2):209.
Elaluf-Calderwood, S; Kietzmann, J and Saccol, A.Z. (2005)." Methodological approach for mobile studies: empirical research considerations ", 4th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management studies. Paris:Academic Conference Limited,p 133-140;
Engestrom, Y (2001)." Expansive learning at work: toward an activity-theoretical reconceptualization ". Journal of Education and Work. 14(1): 133-156;
Fortin, D.R.;Dholakia,R.R. (2005)Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research. 58(3): 387-396;
Jones, Q; Ravid,G and Rafaeli, S (2004)."Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: a theoretical model and empirical exploration ". Information systems Research. 15(2): 194-210;
Kaplan, A.M; Haenlein,M(2010)."Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media". Business Horizons. 53(1);59-68;
Kietzmann,Jan H.;Hermkens, K.; McCarthy Ian P.;Silvestre,, Bruno S. (2011)."Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media". Business Horizans. 54(3): 241-251 access for:http://www.slideshare.net/IanMcCarthy/2011-social-mediabh
Kietzmann,Jan H.; Silvestre, Bruno S.; McCarthy, Ian P. (2012). "Unpacking the social media phenomenon: towards a research agenda". Journal of Public Affairs.12(2):109-119. Available
Lakhani, Karim and Wolf, Robert G., Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects (September 2003). MIT Sloan Working Paper No. 4425-03. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=443040 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.443040 .Li , H ; Daugherty , T ; Biocca ,F.(2002). Impact of 3-D advertising on product knowledge, brand attitude, and purchase intention: the mediating role of presence .Journal of Advertising .31(3):43-57 .access
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673675#preview
Ma,M.;Agarwal, R. (2007).Through a glass darkly: information technology design,identity vertification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Information System Research. 18(1):42
Mayzlin,D(2006).Promotional chat on the internet. Marketing science. 25(2):155-163.
MaMillan,S.J; Hwang,J.s. (2002).Measures of Perceived interactivity: an exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising. 31(3):29-42
Neilson,L.A(2010). Boycott or boycott? Understanding political consumerism. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 9(3):214-227;
Parent, M;Plangger,k; Bal,A. (2011). The new WTP: willingness to participate. Business Horizons. 54(3): 219-229;
Rafaeli,S(1988). Interactivity:from new media to communication. Sage Annual review of communication Research: Advancing communication Science. 16: 110-134:
Schultze,U; Leahy,M.M(2009). The avatar-self relationship: enacting presence in second life. Paper Presented at the ICTS 2009.Phoenix: Arizona;
Schultze,U; Orlikowski, W.J (2010). Virtual worlds:a performative perspective on globally distributed, immersive work. Information Systems Research. 21(4):810-821;
Sundar,S.S; Kalyanaraman, S; Brown, J (2003). Explicating web site interactivity. Communication Research. 30(1):30:
Terblanche,N.S. (2011). You cannot run or hide from social media, ask a politician. Journal of Public Affairs. 11(3):156-167;
Waters,R.d; Williams,J.M (2011). Squawking,tweeting,cooing, and hooting: analyzing the communication patterns of government agencies on twitter. Journal of Pu