Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Information Science and Qom University, Qom, Iran

2 M.A. in Information Science and Knowledge, Qom University, Qom, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study is systematic reviewing of organizing metadata standards to find the status of researches in digital libraries. The research attempted to categorize them in terms of the functional area and role that they play in digital libraries. By identifying the statue studded standards, it is possible to determine the functional place of other standards that expanded in the digital library area and are functionally similar to covered standards in this research. In this way, systematic review was used for study. By searching the databases, finally 42 research sources were selected for final review. Findings showed that the organizing standards, based on they role in digital library, could be categorized in seven sections (include Resource description, Resource structure determination, Resource management, Resource content organization, Local format definition in digital library database management system, Semantic context and interoperability). Then, a set of standards in each area were identified (50 standards in total). The results finally showed that MARC with 60.5%, DC with 44.7% and OAI and MODS with 42.1% were the most known standards. Audio-MD, VIDEO-MD with 5.3% also were the most unknown.

Keywords

Belafi, Z. D., Hong, T., & Reith, A. (2019). A library of building occupant behavior models represented in a standardized schema. Energy Efficiency, 12(3), 637-651.
Eid, S. (2019). Library Metadata Standards and Linked Data Services: An Introduction to Arab and International Organizations. Journal of Library Metadata, 1-23.
Fakhari Saadat, A. Haji Zeinolabedini, M. Pazooki, F. (2018). "A Feasibility Study of Resource Description and Access (RDA) Implementation in Manuscripts' Bibliographic Records in Iran. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science,9 (4),.31-48.
Ifijeh, G., Segun-Adeniran, C., & Igbinola, A. (2019). Imperatives and challenges of Resource Description and Access (RDA) implementation in libraries in a developing country. International Information & Library Review, 51(2), 120-127.
Jha, S., & Ashraf, T. (2019). Handbook of UGC NET for Library and Information Science.
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Keele University, University of Durham, School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Department of Computer Science. Keele, Durham: EBSE technical report.
Lagace, N. (2018). The NISO E-Book Metadata Working Group: Varied Stakeholders Looking at a Common Goal. Serials Review, 44(1), 75-76.
Mandal, S. (2018). Development of Multilingual Resource Management Mechanisms for Libraries. Library Philosophy & Practice.
Marcondes, C. H. (2016). Interoperabilidade entre acervos digitais de arquivos, bibliotecas e museus: potencialidades das tecnologias de dados abertos interligados. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação21(2), 61-83.
Maron, D., & Feinberg, M. (2018). What does it mean to adopt a metadata standard? A case study of Omeka and the Dublin Core. Journal of Documentation74(4), 674-691.
McKenna, L., Debruyne, C., & O'Sullivan, D. (2019, May). Modelling the Provenance of Linked Data Interlinks for the Library Domain. In Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference (pp. 954-958). ACM.
Park, J. R., & Tosaka, Y. (2010). Metadata creation practices in digital repositories and collections: Schemata, selection criteria, and interoperability. Information Technology and Libraries29(3), 104-116.
Richter, V., & K. Millerová. )2014(. The Development of Czech Libraries, 1990–2013. library trends 63(2): 161-182.
Roy, B. K., Biswas, S. C., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2018). Designing web-scale discovery systems using the VuFind open source software. Library Hi Tech News35(3), 16-22.
Xie, I., & Matusiak, K. (2016). Discover digital libraries: Theory and practice. Elsevier.