Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Journal Rank in Different Years

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

News

Journal Metrics

Article acceptance process

Authors Guide

Writing Style

Article submission guide

Download the article structure file

Receive the commitment form

Get a form of conflict of interest

Method of writing a list of sources and references

Referees Guide

Guide to registering and working with Publons)

Reviwers (2020-2021)

Reviwers (2021-2022)

Reviwers (2022-2023)

Reviwers (2023-2024)

Modeling Barriers of Theorizing in Knowledge and Information Science from the Perspective of Faculty Members Based on Grounded Theory

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Master of Information Science and Knowledge, Tarbiat Modares University/Economics and Managemen Dept, Tehran, Iran

2 Full Professor, Information Science and Knowledge Dept, Faculty of Economics and Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Information Science and Knowledge, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Despite the breadth and richness of the subject and the variety of topics in the field of knowledge and information science facing researchers, the field suffers from theoretical poverty. The purpose of this study is to identify the theoretical barriers in information science and knowledge. This is a qualitative research. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data. Members of the faculty of knowledge and information science at Iranian universities formed the statistical population of this study. Theoretical sampling method was used for sample selection. In total, 18 faculty members of Birjand, Tarbiat Modarres, Tabriz, Shahid Bahona and Shahid Chamran universities interviewed. The data were coded based on the grounded theory in three steps. MAX QDA software was used for data encoding. Finally 10 core categories were obtained. Among the 10 core categories, the categories of "shaky personality" and "belief system failure" were selected as the central classes. According to Glazer’s recommendation, the belief system failure was referred to the shaky personality class. In other words, the shaky personality class was identified as the central class. For the first time in Iran and outside Iran, the barriers of theorizing in knowledge and information science have been examined with a qualitative approach. Therefore, on the one hand, the subject under study and adopting a qualitative approach on the other hand, demonstrate its value and authenticity.

Keywords

References
Arab Mokhtari, R.(2007). Identification of Research Obstacles and Problems in Physical Education and Sport Sciences of Public Universities of Iran from the Viewpoints of Graduate Students. M.Sc., Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Tehran
Ashrafi, H., Zarmehr, F., Ghazavi Khorasgani, Z., Kazempour, Z., Taebi Imani, S. (2015). “Barriers to Research Activities from the Perspective of the Student of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences”. Acta Inform Med. 23(3), 155-159.
Archambault, Eric. (2010). 30 Years in Science - Secular Movements in knowledge Creation. Torento: Science-Metrix.
Chiovitti RF, Piran N. (2003).“Rigour and grounded theory research”. J Adv Nurs. 44(4):427–35.
Corbin, Strauss A. (1998).  Basic of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
Danaeefar, H. (2010). ... “An Analysis of the Inherent and Transverse Barriers to Organizational Theory in Iran”. Surah Monthly. P. 137.
Dubin, R., (1987). Theory Building. Free pr; 2nd Edition.
Fazlollahi, S. (2012).“Factors Affecting Student Research”. Islam and Educational Research, 4(1), 165-184.
Glaser BG, Strauss A. (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Sociology Press.
Hegde, A., et. al. (2017). “Attitudes, experiences, and barriers to research and publishing among dental postgraduate students of Bengaluru City: A cross-sectional study”.  J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent [serial online] [cited 2019 Dec 10];15:157-61. Available from: http://www.jiaphd.org/text.asp?2017/15/2/157/207907.
Hersij, H. (2011). Barriers to Theory, Methodology, Science Production; Barriers and Solutions [Interview] (October 2011).
Javadian, Y. (2002). “Medical students' attitudes about the importance of research”. Qazvin University of Medical Sciences Journal, 6(2), 64-67.
Khaki, Gh. (2008). Research method with thesis approach. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Higher Education.
Kiani Harchegani, F., Yarmohammadian, M. (1999). “Investigating Factors Affecting Research Among Researchers”. Journal of Research in Iranian Universities and Research Centers.Tehran: Iran Scientific Information and Documentation Center.
Mehrad, J. (2010). Ministry of Science, Research and Technology portal. [Inline] [Accessed in[2012]from:http://www.msrt.ir/sites/ravabetomomi/msrtnews/Lists/jsj/DispForm.aspx?ID=4119.
Meshkat, M. (2011). Getting rid of the stereotypes of names and common theories [Interview] (October 2011).
Noorden, Richard. (2011). 365 days: 2011 in review. Nature.
Nourbakhsh Moghaddam, A. (2014). Encyclopedia of popular psychology. [Inline] [Accessed on 6 9 1396] From: https://public-psychology.ir/
Olaussen, A., et. al. (2017). Barriers to conducting research: A survey of trainees in emergency medicine: EMERGENCY MEDICINE RESEARCH BARRIERS.  EMA 29(2)
Pirouzbakht, M. (2013). Academic advice. [Online] [Accessed on 9/9/96] From: http://pirouzbakht.parsiblog.com/Posts/2/
Polit DF, Beck CT.(2013). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing
Polit DF, Tatano C, Beck CT. (2010). “Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: myths and strategies”. Int J Nurs Stud. Elsevier Ltd; Nov. 47(11):1451–8.
Pourezat, A., Rezaei, P., Yazdani, H. (2009). “Investigating Barriers to Theory in the Social Sciences Territory”. Business Management, 1(2), 47-62.
Strauss A, Corbin J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory: Procedures and Technique. Newbury Park, London, Sage.   
Van de van ,A.H. (1989). “Nothing is quite so Partical as a good theory”. Academy of management review. 14(4).
Wimpenny P, Gass J. (2000). “Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference?” J Adv Nurs;Jun. 31(6):1485–92.
Zibaklam, S. (2008). Theory in Iran [Interview] (June and July 2008).
Aghapour, Ahad; Farrokhi, Nourali; Delavar, Ali. (2018). Obstacles and problems of conducting research in elementary schools from the point of view of teachers and administrators. Master's thesis, Allameh Tabatabai University, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences. [In Persian]
Arab Mokhtari, Roohollah. (2008). Identification of research obstacles and problems in the field of physical education and sports sciences of state universities in the country, from the point of view of postgraduate students. Master's Thesis, Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Master's thesis, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
Danaifar, Hassan. (2008). "An analysis of the inherent and lateral obstacles of organizational theorizing in Iran". Surah Monthly Journal. P. 137. [In Persian]
Dehghani, Mohammad Javad. (2018). The increase in the number of Iranian articles in 2019. Viewed in the fall of 2019 at:https://parstoday.com/dari/news/science-I [In Persian]
Fazlollahi, Saifollah. (2011). "Effective inhibiting factors on student research". Islam and Educational Research, 4(1), 165-184. [In Persian]
Harsij, Hossein. (2013). Obstacles to theorizing, methodology, science production; Obstacles and solutions [interview] (October 2019). [In Persian]
Hassanzadeh, Mohammad; Rasouli, Behrouz; Karimi, Elmira. (2018). "Extra-organizational barriers to the growth of theorizing capacity in Iranian universities: The case study of Tarbiat Modares University". Library and Information Science Studies, pp. [In Persian]
http://www.msrt.ir/sites/ravabetomomi/msrtnews/Lists/jsj/DispForm.aspx?ID=4119 [In Persian]
Khaki, Gholamreza. (2008). Research method with thesis writing approach. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Higher Education. [In Persian]
Mehrad, Jafar. (2008). Portal of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. [Inline] [Accessed in 2019] from:
Nourbakhsh Moghadam, Alireza. (2013). Encyclopedia of popular psychology. [Inline] [Available in 2016] from: https://public-psychology.ir/ [In Persian]
Pai-bast, Samad; Babaei, Mohammad; Nasri, Qadir. (2017). The challenges of theorizing in political science and its ideal model in modern Iran from the point of view of political elites. Master's thesis, Kharazmi University, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences. [In Persian]
Pirouzbakht, Mohammad. (2012). Academic advice. [Inline] [Available on 5/9/1396] from: http://pirouzbakht.parsiblog.com/Posts/2 [In Persian]
Pourezzat, Ali Asghar; Rezaei, Parisa; Yazdani, Hamidreza. (2008). "Investigation of obstacles to theorizing in the realm of social sciences". Business Management, 1(2), pp. 47-62. [In Persian]
Sirafi, Azam; Shariatmadari, Mehdi (2014). Pathology of research obstacles from the perspective of faculty members of Farhangian University; (campuses and higher education centers of Tehran). Master's thesis, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Valiasr University Complex (AS), Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences. [In Persian]
Zibakalam, Saeed (2007). Theorizing in Iran [interview] (June and July 2017). [In Persian]
Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems
Volume 8, Issue 27
July 2021
Pages 1-38
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics