نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 استاد، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، واحد یادگار امام خمینی (ره)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

4 دانشیار، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، واحد علوم تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، تهران، ایران

چکیده

صنعت نرم‌افزار نمودی از مهارت‌های نرم و تفکر انتزاعی انسانی. این پژوهش به‌منظور ارزیابی عملکرد سیستم مدیریت دانش به‌عنوان یکی از مهم‌ترین زیرساخت‌های بهبوددهنده عملکرد در شرکت‌های نرم‌افزاری، بر مبنای رویکرد فراترکیب شده انجام‌شده است. این پژوهش کاربردی و با روش اسنادی و فراترکیب انجام‌شده است. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل اطلاعات از روش هفت مرحله‌ای فراترکیب سندلوسکی و باروسو استفاده شده است. یافته‌ها نشان داد که عوامل سازمانی (فرهنگ، حمایت مدیریت ارشد، استراتژی سازمان، ساختار سازمانی)، عوامل فردی (آموزش، مشارکت کارکنان، دانش و آگاهی نسبت به سیستم‌های مدیریت دانش، مقاومت در برابر تغییر)؛ عوامل زیرساخت فناوری (کاربرپسند بودن، امنیت داده و اطلاعات، روش‌های ارتباط و همکاری، میزان یکپارچگی سیستم‌های سازمانی، کیفیت دانش)؛ فرایند مدیریت دانش (اکتساب دانش، انتقال دانش، خلق دانش)؛ فواید اقتصادی / هزینه (هزینه سرمایه، هزینه عملیاتی) بر روی اریابی عملکرد مدیریت دانش در صنعت توسعه نرم‌افزار تأثیر می‌گذارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Knowledge Management System Performance in the Software Development Industry Using Meta Synthesis Method

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mostafa Pahlevanzadeh 1
  • Nadjla Hariri 2
  • Dariush Matlabi 3
  • Fahimeh Babalhavaeji 4

1 Ph.D. Student in Knowledge and Information Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science , Yadgar Imam Khomeini Branch , Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science , Sciences and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction
New software development models are emerging that help in software development by default. Secure software should be defined based on the fundamental framework of the organization and the fundamental framework of the organization's software, which means that the targeted level of security of various software of an organization depends on the business context and the degree of importance of information in that context. Proper support of the software industry requires a precise and appropriate understanding of the state of this industry as an ecosystem and knowledge of the software product. In addition to having technical complexities, the software industry follows certain economic structures and principles, which are very important in the analysis of the existing support regimes. Without having a secure software production line, the possibility of releasing secure software from this production cycle is impossible. Also, the competitive business environment of organizations depends on the software they have in this field; therefore, considering the level of vulnerabilities, it is reported that in the field of software, the existence of a secure software life cycle, which results in the production and development of secure software, is very necessary (Palumbo et al., 2020). Software companies need to develop knowledge in diverse domains. One of the industries that are very important in the transition from the oil economy due to its great potential in the country, and on the other hand, it realizes a part of the knowledge-based economy, is the software industry, which is struggling with many changes and problems. Due to the intensity of changes in technology and its highly competitive environment, software companies are facing many challenges and uncertainties in providing their products or services in the form of value for customers and also in making money from it. Therefore, it is necessary to provide a suitable solution for software companies to reach their position and the future that can be waiting for them. The present research tries to consider.
What are the factors and performance indicators of the knowledge management system in the software development industry?

Literature Review
In the research, Wang, Ding, and Ming Li (2017) presented a hybrid method for evaluating knowledge management performance based on triangular fuzzy numbers and group support systems. The results showed that the evaluation method has a strong practical and operational capability, and in addition, the evaluation is activated using a group support system. The systematic KMPE method based on an index system can improve the efficiency of organizations in the performance evaluation process. The review goes under these subheadings.
Pojadi and Sardjono (2018) investigated "Evaluation of Knowledge Management System for Disaster Management Using Factor Analysis". The results showed that evaluation models can be built through the performance of agents, organizational culture, and information through the knowledge management system, management support and participation, access and updating, and information monitoring. Fu, Jiang, and Chen (2020) modeled an organizational knowledge management system based on artificial intelligence in a research. The key technologies that need to be solved to achieve knowledge integration were pointed out, including the integration of heterogeneous knowledge distributed between companies, the integration of correlation and the integration of knowledge and production processes. Fuzzy theory was used to create a knowledge extraction mechanism and reference model library from the project model to the dedicated reference model. Finally, a layered diffusion model was developed that matches the characteristics of online knowledge transfer. Greco et al. (2021) in their research examined "a method for evaluating knowledge management systems". The results show that WikiIEN is the solution most indicated for the larger public due to its more user-friendly interface and workflow, and sufficient feature set that does not depend on external software.

Methodology
This research is applied in terms of purpose, which was done with a documentary method, meta composite. The meta-composite approach is a type of qualitative study that examines the information and findings extracted from other qualitative studies with a similar and related topic. As a result, the desired sample for the meta-combination of selected qualitative studies is based on the relationship made with research questions (Lindgreen, Palmer, and Vanhamme, 2004). In this research, the combination method has been used in order to compare, interpret, transform, and combine different frameworks and models presented in the field of knowledge management system performance evaluation in the software development industry.

Results
The purpose of this research is to provide a suitable conceptual framework for identifying the performance evaluation components of knowledge management system in the software development industry with a meta-composite approach. Due to the lack of comprehensive research in the field of identifying factors affecting the performance of the knowledge management system, the performance evaluation indicators of the knowledge management system were first extracted by extensive literature study and based on the frequency of evaluation indicators. The goal is to cover various dimensions of knowledge management system evaluation with a comprehensive study. Due to budget constraints and the economic era with uncertainty, knowledge management implementers need to be able to demonstrate the commercial value of knowledge distribution and reuse in the organization. There are two basic points that all organizations should consider when designing success measures. Therefore, based on the presented conceptual model, managers can evaluate the performance of knowledge management in the software development industry by using organizational factors, individual factors, technology infrastructure factors, knowledge management processes, and economic benefits/costs.

Discussion
Based on the presented conceptual model, managers can evaluate the performance of knowledge management in the software development industry by using organizational factors, individual factors, technology infrastructure factors, knowledge management processes, and economic benefits/costs.

Conclusion
Examining the results showed that components such as organizational factors (culture, senior management support, organization strategy, organizational structure), individual factors (training, employee participation, knowledge and awareness of knowledge management systems, resistance to change); technology infrastructure factors (user-friendliness, data and information security, communication and cooperation methods, degree of integration of organizational systems, knowledge quality); knowledge management process (knowledge acquisition, knowledge transfer, knowledge creation); economic benefits/costs (capital cost, operating cost) affect the evaluation of knowledge management performance in the software development industry.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Knowledge Management
  • Software Development Industry
  • Hybrid Method
انواری رستمی، علی اصغر و شهابی، بهنام. (1388). مدیریت دانش و سازمان یادگیرنده: تحلیلی بر نقش مستندسازی دانش و تجربه. مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات،1(2)،18-3.
آقاشاهی، بهروز، تحیری، هومان و دستغیبی فرد، غلامحسین. (1399). اولویت بندی فرایندهای مدیریت دانش سازمان در روش فرناندز با استفاده از سیستم فازی مبتنی بر قانون. پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 35(33)،662-663.doi: 10.35050/JIPM010.2020.034
بیدختی امین، علی اکبر، مکوند حسینی، شاهرخ و احسانی، ز هرا. (1390). بررسی رابطه بین فرهنگ سازمانی و مدیریت دانش در سازمان آموزش وپرورش شهرستان سمنان.  فصلنامه راهبرد،20  (59)، 216-191.
پورنژدی، شهریار. (1386). ارایه چهارچوب مفهومی برای مدیریت استراتژیک دانش. کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت دانش.
جامی پور، مونا  و شرکت،  محمد حسین. (1394). چالش پیاده سازی موفق سیستم های مدیریت دانش: بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر پذیرش مدیریت دانش در سازمان های ایرانی با رویکردی آمیخته. مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، 2 (7)،450-429. doi: 10.22059/jitm.2015.53887
خدیور، آمنه، نصری نصرآبادی، شهره و  فلاح، الهام. (1393).  طراحی سیستم خبره فازی جهت انتخاب استراتژی مدیریت دانش. پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت،30 (1)، 119-91. 10.35050/JIPM010.2014.003 doi:
درستکار احمدی، ناهید و شفیعی نیک آبادی، محسن. (1394). ارائه یک مدل هوشمند فازی برای ارزیابی فرآیندهای مدیریت دانش در زنجیره تأمین )موردمطالعه: شرکت ایران خودرو). چشم انداز مدیریت صنعتی،2 (18)،175-153.
رهنورد، فرج الله و محمدی، اصغر. (1388). شناسایی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت سیستم مدیریت دانش دردانشکده‌ها و مراکز آموزش عالی تهران. مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات،1(3)،52-37.
رئیسی وانانی، ایمان، تقوا، محمد رضا  و امیر عشایری، دلینا. (1397). طراحی سیستم استنتاج فازی برای ارزیابی عملکرد سیستم مدیریت دانش در صنعت توسعه نرم افزار.  فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت کسب وکار، 6 (24)،36-5. doi:10.22054/ims.2018.8890
شاهقلیان، کیوان  و پاسلر، شهلا. (1388). ارائه الگوی ارزیابی سطح مدیریت دانش در پالایشگاه نفت  بندرعباس. نفت و انرژی، 4 (32)،33-48.
صارمی، محمود و حیدری، علی. (1389). ارائه رویکردی کیفی برای مدل سازی توان رقابتی بنگاه درکسب وکارهای مبتنی بر فناوری پیشرفته: مورد مطالعه صنعت نرم افزار. مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات،2(5)،129-100.
صالحی کرد آبادی، سجاد، گودرزوند چگینی، مهرداد، رضایی دیزگاه، مراد و ثابت، سمیه. (1397). تبیین ارتباط بین مؤلفه‌های مدیریت دانش و میزان خلاقیت کارکنان در شرکت ملی پخش فرآورده‌های نفتی ایران. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی مدیریت منابع انسانی در صنعت نفت، 5 (17)،110-87.
عدلی، فریبا. (1384). مدیریت دانش حرکت به فراسوی دانش.  شماره  چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارات فراشناختی اندیشه، 40-1.
عزیزی، شهریار، اسدنژاد، مهدی، زارع میرک آباد، علی و حسینی، سید سجاد. (1389). بررسی و مقایسه ابعاد مدیریت دانش بین سازمان‌های دولتی و خصوص. مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، 2(4)،116-99.
قلی زاده، رضوان و میر کمالی، سید کمال. (1389). عوامل کلیدی مؤثر بر اشتراک دانش؛ مطالعه موردی دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه فردوسی. فصلنامه انجمن آموزش عالی ایران، 3(1)،78-61.
مانیان، امیر، اصغری‌زاده، عزت‌الله و دهقان بنادگی، محمد. (1390). نقش مدیریت دانش در عملکرد فرایند توسعه محصول جدید پژوهشی پیرامون شرکت‌های SME صنعت نرم افزار استان یزد. مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، 3(3)،150-133.
Venson, X. Guo, Z. Yan, and B. Boehm, “Costing Secure Software Development: A Systematic Mapping Study,” i Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, New York, NY, USA, 2019, p. 9:1–9:11, doi: 10.1145/3339252.3339263.
Bosua, R & K. Venkitachalam. (2013). Aligning strategies and processes in knowledge management: A framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17 (3): 331-346.
Büyüközkan, G, Feyzioglu, O & Çifçi, G. (2011). Fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation of knowledge management tools. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 4(2), 184-195.
Chen, L & Fong, P. S. (2015). Evaluation of knowledge management performance: An organic approach. Information & Management, 52(4), 431-453.
Ehms, K & Langen, M. (2002). Holistic development of knowledge management with KMMM. Siemens AG, 1-8.
Hung, Y. H, Chou, S. C. T & Tzeng, G. H. (2011). Knowledge management adoption and assessment for SMEs by a novel MCDM approach. Decision support systems, 51(2), 270-291.
Karlenzig, W(1999). Chrysler’s new know mobiles". Knowledge Management Magazine, pp: 58-66.
Li, M, Jin, L & Wang, J. (2014). A new MCDM method combining QFD with TOPSIS for knowledge management system selection from the user's perspective in intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Applied soft computing, 21, 28-37.
Lindner, F & Wald, A. (2011). Success factors of knowledge management in temporary organizations. International Journal of project management, 29(7), 877-888.
Makhsousi, A, Sadaghiani, J & Amiri, M. (2013). A review on recent advances on knowledge management implementations. Management Science Letters, 3(3), 861-866.
Migdadi, M. (2009). Knowledge management enablers and outcomes in the small-and-medium sized enterprises. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(6), 840-858.
Palombo, H, et al. ({SOUPS} 2020). An Ethnographic Understanding of Software (In) Security and a Co-Creation Model to Improve Secure Software Development. in Sixteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security.
Patil, S. K & Kant, R. (2014). A hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL and FMCDM to predict success of knowledge management adoption in supply chain. Applied Soft Computing, 18, 126-135.
Ringle, C & Sinkovics, R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 273-277.
Ronaghi, M. and Feyzi, K and Asadpour, A. (2017). Evaluation of Knowledge Management dimensions in an organization by using Grey System Theory. London: Business Intelligence
Şen, C. G & Baraçlı, H. (2010). Fuzzy quality function deployment based methodology for acquiring enterprise software selection requirements. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 3415-3426.
Sher, P. J & Lee, V. C. (2004). Information technology as a facilitator for enhancing dynamic capabilities through knowledge management. Information & management, 41(8), 933-945.
Touré, C, Michel, C & Marty, J. C. (2016). Re-designing knowledge management systems: Towards user-centred design methods integrating information architecture. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.08032.
Wang, J, Ding, D, Liu, O & Li, M. (2017). A synthetic method for knowledge management performance evaluation based on triangular fuzzy number and group support systems. Applied Soft Computing, 39, 11-20.
Wang, T. C & Chang, T. H. (2007). Forecasting the probability of successful knowledge management by consistent fuzzy preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(3), 801-813.
References [in Persian]
Aghashahi, B, Tahiri, H, Dastgheibifard, Gh. (2018). Prioritization of organization's knowledge management processes in Fernandez's method using rule-based fuzzy system. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 35(3), 662-633. [in Persian]
Anvari Rostami, A, Shahabi, B. (2009). Knowledge management and learning organization: An analysis on the role of documenting knowledge and experience. Information Technology Management, 1(2), 18-3. [in Persian]
Adli, F. (2005). Knowledge management moving beyond knowledge. First edition, Tehran: Farashenakhti Andisheh publications, 1-40. [in Persian]
Azizi, Sh, Asadnejad, M, Zare Mirakabad, A, Hosseini, S. (2011). Examining and comparing the dimensions of knowledge management between public and private organizations. Information Technology Management, 2(4), 99-116. [in Persian]
Biddokhti Amin, A, Makvand Hosseini, Sh. and Ehsani, Z. (2011). Investigating the relationship between organizational culture and knowledge management in Semnan education organization. Rahbord Quarterly, 1(1), 7-30. [in Persian]
Dorostkar Ahmadi, N, Shafiei Nikabadi, M. (2014). Presenting a fuzzy intelligent model for evaluating knowledge management processes in the supply chain (case study: Iran Khodro Company). Industrial Management Perspectives, 18(3), 175-153. [in Persian]
Jamipour, M. and Sherkat, m. (2014). The challenge of successful implementation of knowledge management systems: Investigating factors affecting the adoption of knowledge management in Iranian organizations with a mixed approach. Information Technology Management, 7(2), 450-429. [in Persian]
Khadivar, A, Nasri Nasrabadi, Sh. and Falah, A. (2013). Designing a fuzzy expert system to choose a knowledge management strategy. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 30(1), 91-119. [in Persian]
Manian, A, Asgharizadeh, A, Dehghan Banadagi, M. (2011). The role of knowledge management in the performance of the new research product development process around SME companies in the software industry of Yazd province. Information Technology Management, Volume 3, Number 8, 133-150. [in Persian]
Poornazhdi, sh. (2007). Providing a conceptual framework for strategic knowledge management. International Conference on Knowledge Management, Tehran. [in Persian]
Qolizadeh, R. and Mir Kamali, S. (2010). Key factors affecting knowledge sharing; A case study of Ferdowsi University Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology. Iranian Higher Education Association Quarterly, 71-6. [in Persian]
Rahnavard, F, Mohammadi, A. (2009). Identifying the key success factors of the knowledge management system in Tehran's colleges and higher education centers. Information Technology Management, 1(3), 37-52. [in Persian]
Raeisi Vanani, A, Taqva, M, Amir Ashaeri, D. (2017). Designing a fuzzy inference system to evaluate the performance of the knowledge management system in the software development industry. Smart Business Management Studies Quarterly, 6(24), 5-36. [in Persian]
Shahqolian, K. and Passler, Sh. (2009). Presentation of knowledge management level evaluation model in Bandar Abbas oil refinery. Oil and Energy, 41-51. [in Persian]
Saremi, M, Heydari, A. (2010). Providing a qualitative approach for modeling the competitive power of the company in advanced technology-based businesses: the case study of the software industry. Information Technology Management, 2(5), 53-70. [in Persian]
Salehi Kordabadi; S, Goudarzvand Chegini, M, Rezaei Dizgah, M. and Sabet, S. (2012). Explaining the relationship between the components of knowledge management and the level of creativity of employees in Iran's National Oil Products Distribution Company. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Human Resource Management in Oil Industry, 5(17), 87-109. [in Persian]