نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار ، گروه پژوهشی مدیریت اطلاعات و سازماندهی دانش، سازمان اسناد و کتابخانه ملی ایران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

با توجه به تحولات سریع فناوری و افزایش انتظارات کاربران، سازمان‏دهی اطلاعات به یکی از چالش‏برانگیزترین حوزه‌‏های کتابداری تبدیل شده است. این پژوهش با هدف تحلیل بهروش‏‌ها و تجربیات موفق جهانی در زمینه سازمان‏دهی اطلاعات انجام‏شده تا بتواند راهکارهایی کاربردی برای ارتقاء فهرست‏نویسی در کتابخانه‏های ایران ارائه دهد. پژوهش حاضر از نوع کاربردی با رویکرد کیفی و روش تحلیل مضمون انجام شده است. داده‏‌ها از طریق مطالعه اسنادی و تحلیل محتوای گزارش‌‏ها و پروژه‌‏های اجرایی کتابخانه‌‏ها و نهادهای پیشروی بین‏‌المللی در حوزه سازمان‏دهی اطلاعات گردآوری و تحلیل شد. یافته‏‌ها نشان‌‏دهنده پنج دسته کلیدی از اقدامات نوین در حوزه سازمان‏دهی اطلاعات هستند: توسعه استانداردهای فراداده‏ای، ایجاد خدمات داده‌‏باز، پیاده‏سازی داده‏‌های پیوندی، بهره‏‌گیری از فناوری‏‌های هوشمند، و مشارکت کاربران در تولید فراداده. مضمون فراگیر شناسایی‏شده «تحول در سازمان‏دهی و دسترس‏پذیری اطلاعات در محیط دیجیتال» است که بیانگر حرکت به‌‏سوی سیستم‌‏های هوشمند، خودکار و کاربرمحور است. نتایج این مطالعه می‌‏تواند به کتابخانه‏‌های ایرانی در گذار از الگوهای سنتی، به‏کارگیری فناوری‏های نوین و ارتقاء کیفیت خدمات فهرست‏نویسی کمک کند. راهکارهایی چون جایگزینی نرم‏افزارهای سنتی با سامانه‏‌های مبتنی بر RDF، طراحی سیستم‌‏های هوشمند فهرست‏نویسی با بهره‏‌گیری از یادگیری ماشین، ایجاد API باز، پلتفرم‌‏های جمع‌‏سپاری، سامانه واسپاری ناشرین، و اجرای پروژه ملی «ویکی‏‌کتابخانه» مطرح شده‏اند. همچنین توسعه گراف دانش ملی، نشانه‏‌گذاری ساخت‏یافته، و بومی‌‏سازی ISBD نیز برای افزایش تعامل‏‌پذیری، دقت و استانداردسازی داده‌‏های کتابشناختی پیشنهاد شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Experiences of Libraries and International Institutions in Information Organization: Lessons for Iranian Libraries

نویسنده [English]

  • mahboubeh ghorbani

Assistant Professor, Department of Information Management and Knowledge Organization, National Library and Archives of Iran, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction

In the age of digital transformation, libraries around the world are facing unprecedented challenges in the field of information organization. The rapid expansion of digital content, the emergence of intelligent technologies, and the increasing expectations of users for seamless access to information have made traditional cataloging methods inadequate. Conventional MARC-based cataloging systems—once the cornerstone of bibliographic control—are now struggling to meet the demands of interoperability, machine readability, and semantic connectivity in a networked environment. As the global information ecosystem moves toward the Semantic Web and Linked Data paradigms, libraries must redefine their role from being custodians of isolated bibliographic records to active participants in interconnected data infrastructures. This paradigm shift demands new strategies, standards, and technologies that can transform cataloging into an intelligent, user-centered, and collaborative process. The present study, titled “Experiences of Libraries and International Institutions in Information Organization: Lessons for Iranian Libraries, ” aims to analyze global best practices in information organization and to propose context-appropriate strategies for improving cataloging performance in Iranian libraries. Considering the stagnation of traditional cataloging systems in Iran—due to limited infrastructure, outdated software, and insufficient alignment with international standards—this research explores how successful international experiences can be localized to enhance efficiency, innovation, and user satisfaction.
Research Question(s)
The central research question guiding this study is: How can successful international experiences in information organization be used to develop effective strategies for updating cataloging processes, improving performance, and responding more efficiently to user needs in Iranian libraries? This question reflects the dual focus of the study: (1) identifying global best practices, and (2) transforming them into actionable, context-sensitive models suitable for Iran’s library environment.
 

Literature Review

Cataloging theory and practice—from rule-based descriptive systems to intelligent, semantically enriched frameworks. Early studies such as Esse (2013) and Pazouki (2014) emphasized the transition from AACR2 to RDA, highlighting the conceptual transformation toward the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the Library Reference Model (LRM). These frameworks redefined cataloging as a user-centered and relationship-oriented activity rather than a purely descriptive one. Meanwhile, Feldman and Spiteri (2014) envisioned the library catalog of the future as a social and collaborative space, where users actively participate through tagging, annotation, and content contribution. The human dimension of metadata creation—through participatory cataloging—has increasingly complemented automation and machine-driven processes. Recent research, including Roy et al. (2024) and Midde (2024), demonstrated the growing impact of artificial intelligence and machine learning on cataloging and classification. These technologies enhance metadata accuracy, automate subject analysis, and personalize user experiences through recommender systems. Similarly, Ullah et al. (2018) and OCLC (2024) outlined the integration of Linked Data and Open Data frameworks, which improve interoperability and reuse of bibliographic metadata across institutional and disciplinary boundaries. In the Iranian context, scholars such as Hejazi, Heydari, and Geraii (2019), Zarresaz (2021), and Taheri (2012) have identified major challenges facing cataloging modernization, including outdated infrastructure, lack of national coordination, limited adoption of global metadata standards, and insufficient professional training. Although these studies emphasized the need for reform, none have systematically examined how international experiences could be adapted to Iran’s context—a gap this research aims to fill.

Methodology

This research is applied in purpose and qualitative in approach, employing documentary analysis and thematic analysis methods. Data Collection: The corpus consisted of official documents, reports, technical manuals, and strategic plans published between 2019 and 2024 by eight leading international institutions in information organization:

Library of Congress (USA)
British Library
National Library of France (BnF)
German National Library (DNB)
National Library and Archives of Canada (LAC)
National Library of Australia (NLA)
OCLC (Online Computer Library Center)
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA)

A total of 286 documents were retrieved from institutional websites and digital repositories. Each document was systematically coded using alphanumeric identifiers representing the institution and document type (e.g., R = Report, S = Strategy, G = Guideline, etc.).
Data Analysis
The data were analyzed through thematic analysis following the framework proposed by Attride-Stirling (2001) and Braun & Clarke (2006). The analysis proceeded in three iterative stages:

Basic Themes – extraction of meaningful textual units (codes) directly from documents.
Organizing Themes – clustering of related basic themes into broader conceptual groups.
Global Theme – synthesis of organizing themes into an overarching conceptual framework representing the essence of transformation in information organization. Triangulation across data sources and iterative verification by a secondary researcher ensured reliability and validity.
Results

The analysis revealed six major organizing themes that characterize global innovations in information organization and cataloging.

Open Bibliographic and Metadata Services Libraries

Increasingly provide open and reusable metadata through APIs, FTP protocols, and SPARQL endpoints, under Creative Commons or national open data licenses. Initiatives such as data.bnf.fr, British National Bibliography RDF Service, and OCLC WorldCat API exemplify how open access to metadata supports innovation, interoperability, and transparency. Collaborative projects like VIAF (Virtual International Authority File) and WikiLibrary further demonstrate global efforts toward shared metadata ecosystems.

Development of Controlled Vocabularies and Ontologies

Libraries have expanded and digitized subject vocabularies, classification schemes, and ontologies—such as LCSH, RAMEAU, GND, and FAST—transforming them into RDF- or SKOS-based web resources. These tools facilitate multilingual retrieval, semantic linking, and cross-domain search functionalities.

Standardization of Metadata Frameworks

The harmonization of bibliographic standards (RDA, ISBD, MARCXML, ONIX) and alignment with conceptual models like IFLA LRM are central to modern metadata architecture. The RDA 3R Project, ISBD-RDF/XML implementation, and UNIMARC-RDF exemplify initiatives aimed at ensuring cross-standard interoperability.

Implementation of Linked Data and Semantic Web Technologies

Many libraries now employ RDF, OWL, SKOS, and schema.org vocabularies to represent bibliographic entities as interconnected data nodes. The Library of Congress BIBFRAME project and the BnF Knowledge Graph (with over 600 million semantic relationships) showcase the transformation from isolated catalogs to global semantic networks.

Intelligent and Automated Processing

Artificial intelligence is being used to automate cataloging workflows, enhance metadata quality, and accelerate classification. Tools such as AutoDewey, RobotData (BnF), and OCLC AI-based metadata assistants use natural language processing and machine learning to assign subjects, extract entities, and detect inconsistencies. These innovations not only increase productivity but also redefine catalogers’ roles from data entry operators to metadata analysts.

Transformation of Metadata Production Models

Metadata creation is shifting from centralized manual input to distributed, participatory, and automated models. Libraries integrate metadata supplied by publishers (ONIX, CrossRef) and enable user contributions through crowdsourcing platforms. This hybrid approach balances machine efficiency with human contextual insight.
The global theme emerging from these categories is: “Transformation of Information Organization and Accessibility in the Digital Environment”. This theme encapsulates the move from static, isolated cataloging systems toward intelligent, networked, and user-driven infrastructures.

Discussion

The findings reveal that cataloging has evolved into a multidimensional process that integrates technology, collaboration, and intelligence. By adopting open standards and semantic web technologies, libraries enhance the discoverability, interoperability, and reusability of bibliographic data across digital ecosystems. Artificial intelligence introduces significant opportunities for automation, quality control, and personalized discovery. However, ethical considerations—such as data transparency, bias mitigation, and user privacy—must be addressed to ensure responsible adoption. Moreover, user participation in metadata creation enriches cultural and contextual diversity but necessitates robust quality assurance mechanisms. For Iranian libraries, these global experiences offer valuable insights. Despite having professional expertise and strong institutional traditions, Iranian cataloging systems remain largely confined to MARC-based infrastructures with limited semantic capabilities. To bridge this gap, a strategic re-engineering is essential—one that combines technological innovation with capacity building and policy reform. Key adaptation pathways include:
Migration to RDF-based and BIBFRAME-compliant

Cataloging platforms;
Development of a National Open Metadata Repository Providing APIs for reuse;
Integration of AI-assisted cataloging tools for subject analysis and metadata validation;
Implementation of publisher deposit and crowdsourcing systems to expand metadata coverage;
Launch of a National “WikiLibrary” project to connect Iranian metadata with global Linked Data initiatives;
Localization of ISBD and RDA standards to align international models with Persian language and script requirements.

Such initiatives would enable Iranian libraries to transition from isolated bibliographic systems to active contributors in the global knowledge network.

Conclusion

This study synthesizes the best international practices in information organization and demonstrates their applicability to Iran’s library ecosystem. The global trend reveals a decisive shift from descriptive, static cataloging toward intelligent, semantic, and collaborative infrastructures. By embracing open standards, artificial intelligence, and user participation, libraries can enhance both operational efficiency and user experience. For Iran, the path forward involves not merely technological adoption but a conceptual transformation—from maintaining catalogs as passive databases to constructing interconnected knowledge frameworks that align with the global Semantic Web. Implementing RDF-based systems, fostering interoperability, and developing human expertise will empower Iranian libraries to reclaim their central role in the digital knowledge landscape. Ultimately, the transformation envisioned by this study transcends technology; it represents a redefinition of librarianship itself—anchored in openness, intelligence, and collaboration.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • information organization
  • linked data
  • open data services
  • artificial intelligence
  • cataloging best practices
  • libraries and librarianship institutions
پازوکی، فاطمه. (1393). همگامی با تلاش‏های بین‏المللی و با تأکید بر چشم‏انداز عملیاتی کتابخانه کنگره به‏منظور به‏کارگیری قواعد توصیف و دسترسی به منبع (آر.دی.ای). در ایران. پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع‏رسانی، 4(2)، 145-175. https://doi.org/10.22067/riis.v4i2.22077
حجازی، سیده رقیه، حیدری، غلامرضا، و گرایی، احسان. (1399). سناریوهایی برای آیندۀ فهرست‏های کتابخانه‏ای ایرانی. مطالعات کتابداری و سازمان‏دهی اطلاعات، 31(4)، 74-93. https://doi.org/10.30484/nastinfo.2021.2736.2014
زره‏ساز، محمد. (1400). سازمان‏دهی اطلاعات در ایران: فرصت‏ها و راهکارهای پیشنهادشده برای رفع چالش‏ها.  مطالعات کتابداری و سازمان‏دهی اطلاعات، 32(3)، 103-123. https://doi.org/10.30484/nastinfo.2021.2941.2068
صمدی، لاله. (1400). سازمان‏دهی منابع رایانه‏ای، تهران: سمت
طاهری، سید مهدی. (۱۳۹۱). نظام‏های نوین سازمان‏دهی اطلاعات؛ سازمان‏دهی اطلاعات یا دانش؟ نگاهی به تحولات جدید حوزه سازمان‏دهی دانش در گفت‏وگو با دکتر سید رحمت‏الله فتاحی. کتاب ماه کلیات، ۱۷۵، ۳–۶.
فتاحی، رحمت‏الله. (1376). تجدیدنظر در اصول و قواعد فهرست‏نویسی. فصلنامه کتاب. 7(4).54-39
فتاحی، رحمت‏الله. (1386). از آرمان‏ها تا واقعیت: تحلیلی از مهم‏ترین چالش‏ها... و رویکردهای سازمان‏دهی اطلاعات در عصر حاضر. کتابداری و اطلاع‏رسانی، 10(4) (پیاپی 40)، 5- 26. https://lis.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_43812_8a153fad1108903b2387 58997a051322.pdf
فرخاری، فاطمه، چشمه‏سهرابی، مهرداد، کارشناس، حسین، و عظیمی، محمدحسن. (1402). واکاوی فرصت‏ها و چالش‏های کتابخانه‏های هوشمند. مطالعات کتابداری و سازمان‏دهی اطلاعات، 34(3)، 135-168. https://doi.org/10.30484/nastinfo.2024 .3488.2242
References
Abdelaziz, E. E., & Kaffas, S. M. (2018, July 16). Proposal for implementing linked open data on libraries catalogue [Paper presentation]. IFLA WLIC 2018, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
Badiger, M., Badiger, K. G., & Padmamma, S. (2017). Best practices in libraries: An overview. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 6(7), 65–68. https://europub.co.uk/articles/best-practices-in-libraries-an-overview-A-405600
Bibliothèque nationale de France. (2022). 2021 activity report – Summary. BnF. https://www.bnf.fr
Brador, I. (2024, November 12). Could artificial intelligence help catalog thousands of digital library books? An interview with Abigail Potter and Caroline Saccucci. The Signal: Digital Preservation [Blog]. Library of Congress. https://blogs.loc.gov/thesignal/2024/11/could-artificial-intelligence-help-catalog-thousands-of-digital-library-books-an-interview-with-abigail-potter-and-caroline-saccucci/
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
British Library. (2025 Annual report and accounts 2024/25. The Stationery Office. https://www.bl.uk
Calhoun, K. (2006). The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools: Final report, March 17, 2006. Library of Congress.
Chauhan, S., Kandhasamy, K., & Sakthivel, N. (2023). FOLIO: The future of library is open. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 60(3), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2023/v60i3/171035
Coyle, K. (2007). The library catalog in a 2.0 world. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(2), 289–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.02.003
Coyle, K. (2017). Creating the catalog, before and after FRBR [Paper presentation]. Encuentro di Catalogacion y Metadatos, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico. http://kcoyle.net/mexico.html
Diao, J. (2018). Evolution of Western library catalogs: The rising expectations of users. Academic Works, CUNY. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1274&context=yc_pubs
Esse, U. C. (2013). Current trends in cataloguing and the challenges of a cataloguer in the digital age. Information Impact: Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 4(1), 16–23. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/iijikm/article/view/144620
Farkhari, F., CheshmehSohrabi, M., Karshenas, H., & Azimi, M. H. (2023). Analyzing the opportunities and challenges of smart libraries. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, 34(3), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.30484/nastinfo.2024.3488.2242 [In Persian]
Fattahi, R. (1997). Revision of the principles and rules of cataloging. Faslname-ye Ketab: Quarterly of the Book, 7(4), 39–54. [In Persian]
Fattahi, R. (2007). From ideals to reality: An analysis of the main challenges and approaches in information organization in the present age. Library and Information Science, 10(4), 5–26. https://lis.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_43812_8a153fad1108903b238758997a051322.pdf [In Persian]
Feldman, L., & Spiteri, L. (2014). Library catalogues of the future: A social space and collaborative tool? Library Trends, 61(1), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2012.0032
Hejazi, R., Heydari, G., & Geraei, E. (2021). Scenarios for the future of Iranian library catalogs. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, 31(4), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.30484/nastinfo.2021.2736.2014 [In Persian]
Idiegbeyan-Ose, J., Ifijeh, G., Adebayo, O., & Segun-Adeniran, C. (2016). New paradigms in cataloguing in the 21st century: A review of implications and adoption of new strategies for Nigerian libraries. Bilgi Dünyası, 17(1), 120–134. https://bd.org.tr/index.php/bd/article/view/74/68
Kamble, S. (2015). Best practices adopted in academic library and information centres [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Emerging Technologies and the Future of Libraries, Gulbarga, India.
Kett, J., Beyer, S., Manecke, M., Jahns, Y., & Svensson, L. G. (2012). The Deutsche Nationalbibliografie as linked open data: Applications and opportunities [Paper presentation]. IFLA WLIC 2012 — World Library and Information Congress, 78th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, Helsinki, Finland. http://conference.ifla.org/ifla78
Knox, K. (2025, January 15). Transforming library catalogs: The promise and challenges of linked data. Public Libraries Online. https://publiclibrariesonline.org/2025/01/transforming-library-catalogs-the-promise-and-challenges-of-linked-data/
Krynicka, M. (2010). Open access to national bibliography: Polish approach [Paper presentation]. IFLA WLIC 2010 — World Library and Information Congress, 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, Gothenburg, Sweden. http://www.ifla.org/en/ifla76
Marcum, D. B. (2008). The Library of Congress and cataloging’s future. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 45(3), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v45n03_02
Midde, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence and its impact on cataloging practices in modern libraries. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 12(12), b823–b831. https://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2412195.pdf
Mohammad, Z. (2021). Information organization in Iran: Opportunities and proposed solutions to solve challenges. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, 32(3), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.30484/nastinfo.2021.2941.2068 [In Persian]
Monyela, M. (2023). Challenges of cataloguing library resources in the evolving digital environment: The African cataloguer’s experience. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), Article 7667. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/7667
Nwosu, M. C. (2014). Bibliographic control: The changing perspectives of cataloguers, cataloguing and classification in the 21st century librarianship. International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Science, 3(11), 12–22.
OCLC. (2024a). Linked data: The future of library cataloging. OCLC. https://doi.org/10.25333/71w4-vq71
OCLC. (2024b). OCLC annual report 2023–2024. OCLC. https://www.oclc.org/en/annual-report/2024/home.html
Pacek, J., & Krynicka, M. A. (2012). Are you trying to kill me? – The national bibliography asks Internet [Paper presentation]. IFLA WLIC 2012 — World Library and Information Congress, 78th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, Helsinki, Finland. http://conference.ifla.org/ifla78
Pazooki, F. (2014). Using new information organization standards and models in Iranian libraries: Keeping pace with international efforts with emphasis on operating perspective of the Library of Congress. Library and Information Science Research, 4(1), 148–175. https://doi.org/10.22067/riis.v4i2.22077 [In Persian]
Roy, S. V. M., Moradia, S., Shantha, G., Aravind, S., & Shivaprakash, S. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on cataloging and classification systems in modern libraries. Library Progress International, 44(3), 769–773. https://doi.org/10.48165/bapas.2024.44.2.1
Samadi, L. (2021). Computerized information organization. SAMT Publications. [In Persian]
Svensson, L. G., & Jahns, Y. (2010). PDF, CSV, RSS and other acronyms: Redefining the bibliographic services in the German National Library [Paper presentation]. IFLA WLIC 2010 — World Library and Information Congress, 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, Gothenburg, Sweden. http://www.ifla.org/en/ifla76
Taheri, S. M. (2012). New systems of information organization; Information or knowledge organization? A look at recent developments in the field of knowledge organization in an interview with Dr. Seyyed Rahmatollah Fattahi. Ketab-e Mah-e Koliyat, 175, 3–6. [In Persian]
Ullah, A., Khusro, S., Ullah, R., & Naeem, H. (2018). An overview of the current state of linked and open data in cataloging. Information Technology and Libraries, 37(4), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432
Van Deman, L. (2019). The future of cataloging (for the rest of us): Forecasting for production-level cataloging. OLA Quarterly, 25(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.7710/1093-7374.1969
Wynne, S. C., & Hanscom, M. J. (2011). The effect of next-generation catalogs on catalogers and cataloging functions in academic libraries. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49(3), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.559899
Yusuf, F. (2009). Management of change in cataloguing: A survey of practices in Covenant University and University of Lagos, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), Article 304. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/304
Zhai, X., & Nie, N. (2012). The gap between users and cataloging: Description and analysis of survey data in Chinese academic library [Paper presentation]. IFLA WLIC 2012 — World Library and Information Congress, 78th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, Helsinki, Finland. https://www.ifla.org/past-wlic/2012/80-zhai-en.pdf