نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه آموزشی علم اطلاعات و دانش‌‏شناسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

2 گروه آموزشی علم اطلاعات و دانش‌‏شناسی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران

3 گروه پژوهشی سیستم‌‏های اطلاعاتی موسسه ایرانداک.، تهران، ایران

4 گروه آموزشی علم اطلاعات و دانش‏شناسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

با توجه به افزایش تصاویر دیجیتالی و دسترسی آسان به دوربین‏‌های دیجیتال، پردازش و بازیابی تصویر به یکی از مهم‏ترین زمینه‏‌های تحقیقاتی تبدیل شده است. ازاین‏‌رو هدف این مقاله بررسی روند تحقیقاتی در بازیابی تصاویر با استفاده از هستی‌‏شناسی است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش تمامی پژوهش‏‌هایی است که تا پایان سال 2024 در پایگاه اسکوپوس نمایه شده است که تعداد آن‏ها 716 اثر است. برای تحلیل داده‏ها از نرم‌‏افزار اکسل، گفی، بیب اکسل، اس پی اس اس و برای ترسیم نمودار از نرم‏افزار ووس ویور، اکسل و اس پی اس اس استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد کلیدواژه بازیابی تصاویر با فراوانی 572 در جایگاه اول قرار دارد. تحلیل هم‏‌واژگانی به تشکیل شش خوشه منجر شد. زیرساخت‏‌ها و فناوری‌‏های بنیادین بازیابی تصویر، تکنیک‏‌های معنایی و تحلیل محتوای تصویر، یادگیری ماشین و کاربردهای هوشمند در بازیابی تصویر، وب معنایی و جستجوی مبتنی بر هستی‌‏شناسی، جنبه‌‏های مدیریتی و انسانی در بازیابی اطلاعات، بهبود کیفیت و پردازش پرس‏وجو در بازیابی تصویر. در میان مفاهیم موجود، برخی از آن‏ها بیشترین تعداد استناد را دریافت کرده‏اند: مانند بازیابی تصویر، یادگیری ماشین، بینایی کامپیوتر، یادگیری عمیق، سیستم‌‏های پایگاه داده، کتابخانه‏‌های دیجیتال، اینترنت، ورد نت، هوش مصنوعی، بازیابی اطلاعات. نمودار سلسله مراتبی چهار خوشه موضوعی بازیابی تصویر مبتنی بر معناشناسی، بازیابی هوشمند تصاویر با الگوریتم یادگیری، بازیابی معنایی تصاویر به کمک حاشیه‏‌نویسی، بازیابی هوشمند تصاویر تشکیل شد. نقشه‏های علمی روش مناسبی برای نمایش رشد روزافزون فعالیت‏‌های علمی و سازمان‏دهی ساختار فکری و علمی تشکیل‏‌دهنده‌‏ی یک قلمروی موضوعی است

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Research Trends in Ontology-Driven Image Retrieval

نویسندگان [English]

  • Razieh Farshid 1
  • Saeid Asadi 2
  • Davood Haseli 3
  • Azadeh Fakhrzadeh 4

1 Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Information Systems Research, Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc), Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction

Regarding the increase in digital images and easy access to digital cameras, image processing and retrieval have become an important research field. Image retrieval is one of the important subfields of information retrieval that usually uses different techniques and models than text retrieval. The main expectation of users of information retrieval systems is to find relevant resources among thousands of resources available in these systems. Creating a scientific map of articles in the field of image retrieval using ontology can provide awareness of the status of published research; it can also help to show thematic relationships, identify influential topics, mature, emerging, and undeveloped topics, thematic gaps, and create appropriate scientific policies in this field.

Literature Review

A small number of studies have been conducted in the field of image retrieval using ontology, none of which have examined the hierarchical diagram. In the field of scientometric research, such as Daniali, Naghshineh, and Fadaei (2017); Daniali and Naghshineh (2018); Azimi and Jozi (2014); Ghanbari et al. (2014); Liu et al. (2021); Jo (2024); Khan et al. (2024). Scientometric studies often focus on assessing publication patterns, citation networks, co-authorship, and research productivity. These studies help researchers understand the structure and evolution of the scientific literature in a given field.

Methodology

In terms of type, the present study is in the category of applied research in which scientometric techniques and social network analysis have been used. The research community consists of those studies in the field of information retrieval with ontology that have been indexed in the Scopus database from the beginning to the end of 2024.
Based on the formula in the search, 716 indexed articles were found in Scopus in the desired field. To be more precise, the statistical population of this study consists of all 716 published articles in the field of image retrieval using ontology.
After retrieving relevant records and integrating data, based on the research objectives and questions, data analysis was carried out using BibExcel, Gephi, Excel, and SPSS, and the maps were created by VOSviewer software. In order to draw thematic maps and analyze them correctly, keywords were controlled and standardized by creating a Thesaurus in the software. In such a way that identical and similar keywords and plural and singular forms were merged and non-specialized and searched keywords were removed. In order to classify words in published documents based on semantic similarity using algorithms such as Euclidean distance and..., hierarchical clustering is usually used. Hierarchical clustering was performed using SPSS software. In order to implement and achieve the analysis, requirements such as a co-occurrence matrix must first be prepared, and then the co-occurrence matrix must be converted into a correlation matrix. The statistical population of the present study was the entire population. In order to perform a more accurate synonym analysis and final synonym analysis, the matrix was called through SPSS software, and the regular matrix was converted into a correlation matrix by SPSS software. The correlation matrix that was based on the obtained cognates frequency matrix, clusters and hierarchical were drawn using hierarchical clustering using the Ward method and squared Euclidean distance. Among the 716 retrieved articles, keywords with a frequency of 11 and more were selected for the research to prepare the matrix, and finally a square matrix of 142 by 142 was formed for the research.
The diagonal cells of the matrices were considered zero and then these ordinary matrices were converted into a correlation matrix. Finally, the clustering of concepts was drawn based on statistical software (SPSS version 26). Finally, to draw a scatter diagram and identify the development and maturity status of the topics, the frequency matrix of each cluster was drawn separately, then their correlation matrix was drawn, and with the help of the strategic diagram, using the density and centrality of each cluster, their coherence and maturity were calculated. In the next step, a strategic diagram of thematic clusters was drawn; the strategic diagram describes the internal relationship and correlation between the different thematic clusters. Excel, Gephi, Babel Excel, and SPSS software were used to analyze the data, and Word Viewer, Excel, and SPSS software were used to draw the diagram.

Results

The results showed that among the keywords, the keyword image retrieval is in the first place with a frequency of 572. Among them, the keywords ontology and semantics are in the second and third places, respectively. Also, the analysis of the findings related to the synonym of image retrieval using ontology took the form of six thematic areas. Infrastructures and fundamental technologies of image retrieval, techniques of concepts and image analysis, intelligent machines and applications in image retrieval, web concepts and search based on ontology, managerial and human aspects in information retrieval, quality improvement and query processing in image retrieval.
The results obtained from the hierarchical diagram formed four topic clusters. Also, the findings from the strategic map of image retrieval topics using ontology indicate that cluster 1 was placed in the first part due to its high centrality and density. These clusters are higher in centrality and density. Clusters 2 and 4 are placed in the second part. The clusters that are located in the second part of the strategic picture are regional clusters. But they are developed. Cluster 3 is located in the fourth part. The clusters in the fourth part are the main ones, but are undeveloped and immature.

Discussion

With the help of scientometrics, a macro picture of the state of research and how different domains are related, can be presented. Co-occurrence analysis led to the formation of six clusters. Fundamental infrastructures and technologies of image retrieval, semantic techniques and image content analysis, machine learning and intelligent applications in image retrieval, semantic web and ontology-based search, managerial and human aspects of information retrieval, quality improvement and query processing in image retrieval. Among the existing concepts, some of them have received the highest number of citations: such as image retrieval, machine learning, computer vision, deep learning, database systems, digital libraries, Internet, WordNet, artificial intelligence, and information retrieval. A hierarchical diagram of four thematic clusters was formed: semantic-based image retrieval, intelligent image retrieval with learning algorithms, semantic image retrieval with annotations, and intelligent image retrieval.

Conclusion

Studies in the field of image retrieval using ontology as a useful tool for effective retrieval can play an effective role. Most studies are in the field of ontology and ontology construction, but no specific research has specifically addressed this area. In this study, the emphasis is on image retrieval, but the high importance of this area, the recognition of the components of this area, and the impact of ontology on semantic retrieval require researchers to focus on these issues, and the results of this study indicate that very little attention has been paid to this area, especially in Iran. Scientific maps are a suitable method for displaying the increasing growth of scientific activities and organizing the intellectual and scientific structure that constitutes a thematic domain. Researchers, science policymakers, and other interested parties can advance their own goals and advance with greater awareness in this field by being aware of this structure.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • ontology-based information retrieval
  • image retrieval
  • ontology
  • hierarchical clustering
جعفری باقی آبادی، سمیه و فرشید، راضیه. (1400). مطالعه پژوهش‏های مرتبط با واکسن کووید ۱۹ در ایران و جهان: تحلیل موضوعی و همکاری‏های علمی. مجله میکروب‏شناسی پزشکی ایران، ۱۵(۴)، ۴۱۴-۴۵۷. http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/JMIS.9.1.6
دانیالی، سمیرا و نقشینه، نادر. (1397). مطالعه روند پژوهش و ترسیم نقشه دانش قلمروهای پژوهشی فعال حوزه بازیابی تصویر بر اساس مقالات نمایه شده در وب آو ساینس از سال 2012-2001. پژوهش‏نامه علم‏سنجی، 4(1)، 119-142. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2018.612
دانیالی، سمیرا، نقشینه، نادر و فدایی، غلامرضا. (1396). ترسیم نقشه هم رخدادی واژگان حوزه بازیابی تصویر بر اساس مقالات نمایه شده در پایگاه وب آو ساینس. مجله علم‏سنجی کاسپین، 4(2)، 53-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/cjs.4.2.53
شریف، عاطفه. (1387). کاربرد هستی‏شناسی‏ها در نظام مدیریت دانش. کتابداری و اطلاع‏رسانی، 3(43)، 97-116.
صنعت جو، اعظم. (1391). عملکرد هستی‏شناسی‏ها در نظام‏های بازیابی اطلاعات، کتاب ماه کلیات، 16(2)، 43-47.
عظیمی، محمدحسن و اسماعیلی، سمیرا. (1404). ترسیم ساختار فکری و روند تکامل دانش در حوزه آر‏دی‏اف. فصلنامه بازیابی دانش و نظام‏های معنایی، 12(43)، 211-242. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2022.69907.1532
عظیمی، محمدحسن و جوزی، زینب. (1402). بررسی علم‏سنجی و تحلیل خوشه‏های موضوعی پژوهش‏های حوزه هستی‏شناسی در بازیابی اطلاعات. مجله علم‏سنجی کاسپین، 10(2)، 54-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/cjs.4.2.53
علی پور، امید، سهیلی، فرامرز، ضیایی، ثریا و خاصه، علی‏اکبر. (1404). تحلیل شبکه هم‏نویسندگی مقالات سازمان‏دهی دانش در ایران. فصلنامه بازیابی دانش و نظام‏های معنایی، 12(43)، 175-210. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2022.69907.1532
فرشید، راضیه، سهیلی، فرامرز، غلامی، حامد و گرایی، احسان. (1399). واکاوی قلمروهای مطالعاتی سرطان معده با استفاده از روش خوشه‏بندی سلسله مراتبی. مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت، 17(3)، 133-139. https://doi.org/10.22122/him.v17i3.4117
فرهادی، مرضیه و جم زاده، منصور. (1396). بازیابی تصویر مبتنی بر محتوا با استفاده از معیار تشابه ناحیه‏بندی. علوم یارانشی، 3-12.
قنبری، میلاد، وقوفی، امید و حاجیانی، ابراهیم. (1402). تحلیل علم‏سنجی پژوهش‏های با موضوع تصاویر آینده در معتبرترین نشریات علمی جهان. فصلنامه علمی مطالعات راهبردی فرهنگ، 3(4)، 89-108. https://doi.org/10.22083/scsj.2024.429841.1133
هماوندی، هدی، فهیم نیا، فاطمه، ناخدا، مریم و حسینی بهشتی، ملوک السادات. (1399). مطالعه روش‏های ایجاد هستی‏شناسی: شناسایی مؤلفه‏ها و ویژگی‏ها بر مبنای تحلیل پژوهش. تحقیقات کتابداری و اطلاع‏رسانی دانشگاهی، 1(54)، 13-39. https://doi.org/10.22059/jlib.2020.303455.1493
References
Alipour, O., Soheili, F., Ziaei, S., & Khasseh, A. A. (2021). Co-authorship network analysis of knowledge organization articles in Iran. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 13(49), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2022.69907.1532 [In Persian]
Azimi, M. H., & Jozi, Z. (2023). Scientometrics and subject cluster analysis of ontology research in information retrieval. Caspian Journal of Scientometrics, 10(2), 54–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/cjs.4.2.53 [In Persian]
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2023). The Semantic Web: A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. In Linking the world's information: Essays on Tim Berners-Lee's invention of the World Wide Web (pp. 91–103). Association for Computing Machinery.
Bitters, B. (2005). A geographical ontology of objects in the visible domain [Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Cure, O. (2003). Mapping databases to ontologies to design and maintain data in a semantic web environment. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 1(5), 1–6. http://www.iiisci.org/journal/cvs/sci/pdfs/p704935.pdf
Daniali, S., & Naqshineh, N. (2018). Studying the research trend and drawing a knowledge map of active research domains in the image retrieval field based on articles indexed in the Web of Science from 2001-2012. Scientometrics Journal, 4(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2018.612 [In Persian]
Daniali, S., Naqshineh, N., & Fadaei, G. (2017). Drawing a co-occurrence map of image retrieval terms based on articles indexed in the Web of Science database. Caspian Journal of Scientometrics, 4(2), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.22088/cjs.4.2.53 [In Persian]
Azimi, M. H. & Esmaeili, S. (2023). Drawing the intellectual structure of knowledge in the field of RDF. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 15(57), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2022.69907.1532 [In Persian]
Farhadi, M., & Jamzadeh, M. (2017). Content-based image retrieval using segmentation similarity criterion. Yaranshi Sciences, 3(1), 3–12. [In Persian]
Farshid, R., Soheili, F., Gholami, H., & Geraee, E. (2020). Analyzing the study areas of gastric cancer using hierarchical clustering method. Health Information Management, 17(3), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.22122/him.v17i3.4117 [In Persian]
Ghanbari, M., Voghofi, O., & Hajiani, E. (2024). Scientometric analysis of research on future images in the world's most prestigious scientific publications. Strategic Studies of Culture, 3(4), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.22083/scsj.2024.429841.1133 [In Persian]
Ghasemian, A., Nojavan, F., Asnafi, A., & Zohorifar, F. (2025). Analysis of research outputs in the field of psychology and their presence in scientific social media. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 12(42), 61–90. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2022.67962.1504 [In Persian]
Haghani, M. (2023). What makes an informative and publication-worthy scientometric analysis of literature: A guide for authors, reviewers and editors. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 22, Article 100956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100956
Homavandi, H., Fahimnia, F., Nakhoda, M., & Hosseini Beheshti, M. (2020). A study on ontology building methods: Understanding of the features and requirements. Journal of Academic Librarianship and Information Research, 54(1), 13–39. https://doi.org/10.22059/jlib.2020.303455.1493 [In Persian]
Jafari Baghiabadi, S., & Farshid, R. (2021). Studying of research related to COVID-19 vaccine in Iran and the world: A thematic analysis and scientific collaborations. Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology, 15(4), 414–457. https://doi.org/10.30699/ijmm.15.4.414 [In Persian]
Ju, F. (2024). Mapping the knowledge structure of image recognition in cultural heritage: A scientometric analysis using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix. Journal of Imaging, 10(11), Article 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10110272
Khan, U., Khan, H. U., Iqbal, S., & Munir, H. (2024). Four decades of image processing: A bibliometric analysis. Library Hi Tech, 42(1), 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-10-2021-0351
Khasseh, A. A., Mokhtari, H., & Asheghi Moaf, M. (2022). Information retrieval in Iran: A scientometric study and scientific visualization. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 9(33), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2022.64246.1476 [In Persian]
Li, J., Goerlandt, F., & Reniers, G. (2021). An overview of scientometric mapping for the safety science community: Methods, tools, and framework. Safety Science, 134(1), Article 105093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105093
Liu, W., Wu, H., Hu, K., Luo, Q., & Cheng, X. (2021). A scientometric visualization analysis of image captioning research from 2010 to 2020. IEEE Access, 9, 156799–156817. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3129782
Liu, Y., Zhang, D., Lu, G., & Ma, W. Y. (2007). A survey of content-based image retrieval with high-level semantics. Pattern Recognition, 40(1), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2006.04.045
Manzoor, U., Balubaid, M. A., Zafar, B., Umar, H., & Khan, M. S. (2015). Semantic image retrieval: An ontology based approach. International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence, 4(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJARAI.2015.040401
Mezaris, V., Kompatsiaris, I., & Strintzis, M. G. (2004). Region-based image retrieval using an object ontology and relevance feedback. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2004(6), Article 870494. https://doi.org/10.1155/S1110865704401188
Moosavi, S. S., Farshid, R., & Jafari Baghi Abadi, S. (2021). The role of medical and health archives in scientific research from a scientometrics perspective. Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology, 15(5), 508–536. https://doi.org/10.30699/ijmm.15.5.508 [In Persian]
Sanatjoo, A. (2012). The performance of ontologies in information retrieval systems. Book of Generalities, 16(2), 43–47. [In Persian]
Sharif, A. (2008). Application of ontologies in knowledge management system. Library and Information Sciences, 11(3), 97–116. [In Persian]
Smith, J. R. (2001). Quantitative assessment of image retrieval effectiveness. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(11), 969–979. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1162
Taheri, S. M., & Shokrzadeh, N. (2025). Mapping the scientific outputs of Allameh Tabataba'i University from 1974 to 2024. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 12(42), 23–60. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2024.81904.1671 [In Persian]
Yu, D., Xu, Z., Kao, Y., & Lin, C. T. (2017). The structure and citation landscape of IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems (1994–2015). IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(2), 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2672732