نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه آموزشی علم اطلاعات و دانش‏‌شناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.

2 گروه صنعتی سپاهان باتری، اصفهان، ایران.

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر مطالعه تأثیر مدیریت دانش بر عملکرد تجاری‏سازی فناوری با تأکید بر نقش میانجی نوآوری سازمانی در شرکت سپاهان باتری است. پژوهش حاضر، پژوهشی پیمایشی است که در آن از ابزار پرسشنامه استاندارد برای گردآوری داده‏ها استفاده شده است. جامعه آماری این مقاله مربوط به واحد تجاری‏سازی شرکت سپاهان باتری با حدود 100 نفر نیروی انسانی است. با توزیع پرسشنامه در میان 80 نفر از ایشان، تعداد 70 پرسشنامه برای تحلیل عودت داده شد که مبنای تحلیل آماری قرار گرفته است. پرسشنامه شامل 32 سؤال اصلی به تعداد شاخص‏های تبیین‏کننده سازه‏های پژوهش است. همچنین برای بررسی روایی (روایی همگرا و واگرا) از تکنیک معادلات ساختاری، به روش حداقل مربعات جزئی و برای بررسی پایایی پرسشنامه از سه معیار ضرایب بارهای عاملی، آلفای کرونباخ و پایایی ترکیبی استفاده شده است. بررسی نتایج پژوهش با استفاده از تکنیک مدل‏سازی معادلات ساختاری به روش حداقل مربعات جزئی نشان داد که مدیریت دانش بر نوآوری ‏سازمانی تأثیر معناداری با مقدار 508/. دارد. همچنین مدیریت دانش بر عملکرد تجاری‏سازی ‏فناوری تأثیر معناداری با مقدار 345/. دارد و میانجی‏گری نوآوری سازمانی در رابطه مدیریت دانش بر عملکرد تجاری‏سازی فناوری تأثیر معناداری با مقدار 373/. دارد. بقای شرکت سپاهان باتری و ایجاد مزیت رقابتی پایدار برای این شرکت، درگرو ارتقای پیوسته دانش سازمانی و مدیریت آن، فراهم کردن بستری جهت خلق و به‏کارگیری نوآوری‏های سازمانی و درنتیجه، بهبود عملکرد تجاری‏سازی فناوری است

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of Knowledge Management on Technology Commercialization Performance with the Mediating Effect of Organizational Innovation

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Ebrahim Samie 1
  • Farnoosh Barati 2

1 Department of Knowledge and Information Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Sepahan Battery Industrial Group, Isfahan, Esfahan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction

Knowledge management is a planned and structured perspective aimed at creating, sharing, storing, and utilizing knowledge to enhance an organization's capability, speed, and effectiveness in delivering products or services. From the perspective of scientists and scholars, technology is the final product of research or technical knowledge that is transformed into a commercial product. Technology commercialization means the movement of ideas from research laboratories to the market. Innovation refers to the successful and beneficial implementation of creative ideas within a company. In today's competitive market, companies are compelled to utilize all their knowledge capacities and commercialize them through innovative strategies and actions in order to remain at the forefront. For this purpose, companies can achieve this by focusing more on knowledge management and establishing the necessary and standard infrastructure in this field. To take action and realize this important goal, a precise examination of the subject must first be conducted. In this regard, we will examine the impact of knowledge management on technology commercialization performance, emphasizing the role of organizational innovation mediator, so that managers can provide the results of this research to managers and decision-makers of companies so that they can reach a more informed decision. In the present article, the role of organizational innovation and knowledge management on improving the level of technology commercialization performance in Sepahan Battery Company, as one of the world-class manufacturing companies, has been examined to surpass other competitors.
Hypothesis(es)

HMain: Knowledge management, along with the mediating role of organizational innovation, has a positive and significant effect on technology commercialization performance.

The sub-hypotheses of the research are as follows:

H1: Knowledge management has a positive and significant effect on technology commercialization performance.
H2: Knowledge management has a positive and significant effect on organizational innovation.
H3: Organizational innovation has a positive and significant effect on technology commercialization performance.


Literature Review

In this section, previous researches are categorized and discussed based on thematic topics of knowledge management, organizational innovation, and technology commercialization performance.
Knowledge management
Many operational studies in this field are mentioned, including (Karami et al. 2018), (Tavalaei et al. 2021), (Morovvati et al. 2023), (Bavakhani et al. 2020), (Birami Erdy et al. 2019), (Birvanvand et al. 2021), and (Jiang et al. 2025). Knowledge management processes in this study – Discovery, Capture, Sharing and Application - are also adapted from the reference (Samie and Jazghani 2022).
 Organizational innovation
Various studies have been mentioned, including (Khairgoo et al. 2019), (Kalkan et al. 2014), (Hervas-Oliver et al. 2015), (Maqsoudi et al. 2021), (Riaz et al. 2025), and (Harsono et al. 2025). In the present study, organizational innovation has been examined and measured based on the three dimensions mentioned by Mardani, including innovation speed, innovation quality, and innovation quantity (Mardani 2021).
Technology commercialization performance
Extensive researches have been mentioned, including (Kim et al. 2020), (Daniel and Alves 2020), (Daneshjoovash et al. 2021), (Kiani Ghale-Sard et al. 2021), (Abdinejad et al. 2022), (Etebari et al. 2021), (Satar et al. 2025), and (Al Halbusi et al. 2025). In the present study, technology commercialization performance was measured based on four dimensions - number of new products, faster time to market, future of the market, and effective use of technical knowledge - mentioned in the Reference (Kiani and Rafat 2021).

Methodology

The statistical population is the commercialization unit of Sepahan Battery Company with 100 employees. 70 questionnaires were used for analysis. The questionnaire includes 32 main questions, the number of indicators explaining the research variables, which were designed based on a five-point Likert scale from completely disagree (1) to completely agree (5). For validity analysis (convergent and divergent), the structural equation technique was used, using the partial least squares method, and to examine the reliability of the questionnaire, three criteria of factor loading coefficients, Cronbach's alpha, and composite reliability were used. In the partial least squares method, before testing the hypotheses, the measurement model and structural model of the research were examined by Smart PLS software.

Results

The results of the study using the structural equation modeling technique, using the partial least squares method, showed that knowledge management has a significant effect on organizational innovation, with a value of 0.508. Knowledge management also has a significant effect on technology commercialization performance with a value of 0.345, and the mediation of organizational innovation in the relationship between knowledge management and technology commercialization performance has a significant effect with a value of 0.373.

Discussion

In support of H1, it can be stated that knowledge management processes have a significant impact on technology commercialization performance and lead to more and newer products in less time, and will create a better future for the organization in a competitive market. In addition, the company can make optimal use of inventions and technical knowledge by improving its knowledge, which will improve technology commercialization performance.
In support of H2, it can be said that the establishment of a knowledge management system in the organization leads to greater speed, higher quality, and greater quantity in the organization's innovation, and thus helps the organization to surpass its competitors. In addition, the increased motivation created among employees by establishing a knowledge management system will lead to more knowledge sharing by them and the optimal application of knowledge in the organization, which in turn will lead to the creation of innovative ideas, strategies, and processes by them.
In support of H3, it can be said that the starting point of innovation and improving the performance of technology commercialization is achieving the quality and quantity of new products and services at a faster rate, as the main inputs that lead to the production of new products in less time using inventions and technical knowledge, and ensuring the future of the market. Given the inherent risk in innovative plans for technology commercialization, it is essential to pay attention to financial resources and their provision, such as attracting capital from industrial investment institutions, obtaining commercial loans, joint ventures, providing foreign investment capabilities, and receiving government support. In summary, the present study will address the concerns of managers in establishing a knowledge management system and an innovation system in strategies, ideas, and methods in order to improve the performance of technology commercialization.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that the survival of Sepahan Battery Company and the creation of a sustainable competitive advantage for this company depend on the continuous improvement of organizational knowledge and its management, providing a platform for the creation and application of organizational innovations, and, as a result, improving the performance of technology commercialization.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • knowledge management
  • organizational innovation
  • technology commercialization performance
اشرفی سلیم کندی، فرشید، قلاوندی، حسن، و قلعه‏ای، علیرضا. (1400). رابطۀ تفکر انتقادی و نوآوری سازمانی با میانجی‏گری اخلاق سازمانی. فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فناوری، 16(1)، 100-107.
اعتباری، مهدی، نادری بنی، محمود، الحسینی المدرسی، سید مهدی، صادقی، حجت‏الله. (1400). تحلیل نقش تعدیل‏گری تجانس سبک زمانی بر رابطۀ بین مشارکت مشتری و زمان ایده به محصول در بازاریابی صنعتی. تحقیقات بازاریابی نوین، 11(2)، 198-169.‎ https://doi.org/10.22108/nmrj.2021.126157.2311
آفندیده، نازیلا، زارعی، متین، پورکریمی، جواد و رحمتی، محمدحسین. (1400). شناسایی مؤلفه‏های فرهنگ‏سازمانی مطلوب تجاری‏سازی نتایج تحقیقات دانشگاه علوم پزشکی. پژوهش در آموزش علوم پزشکی، 13(1)، 57-71.‎
باواخانی، آناهیتا، رضایی شریف‏آبادی، سعید، غایبی، امیر، و نجفی، محسن. (1399). توسعه مدل خلق دانش سازمانی در شرکت‏های دانش‏بنیان ایران. کتابداری و اطلاع‏رسانی، 23(1)، 121-150.  https://doi.org/10.30481/lis.2020.199360.1618
بیرانوند، علی، سمیع، محمدابراهیم، اکبرنژاد، رضا، و جمال‏زاده، زهرا. (1400). شناسایی ابعاد و شاخص‏های مدیریت دانش شخصی در سازمان آب منطقه‏ای فارس. تحقیقات کتابداری و اطلاع‏رسانی دانشگاهی، 55(2)، 123-154. https://doi.org/10.22059/jlib.2022.332950.1572
بیرانوند، علی، سمیع، محمدابراهیم، و رحمانیان، ساره. (1400). بررسی ارتباط سنجه‏های حاصل از میزان فعالیت نویسندگان پر تولید ایرانی حوزه مدیریت بازرگانی در شبکه‏های اجتماعی-علمی بر شاخص‏های علم‏سنجی پایگاه‏های اطلاعاتی. فصلنامه بازیابی دانش و نظام‏های معنایی، 8(26)، 31-52. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2021.58283.1409
تولایی، روح‏الله، حقیقی بروجنی، پیام، و خلیلی، حسن. (1400). بررسی تأثیر مدیریت دانش بر عملکرد راهبردی و عملیاتی سازمان‏ها از طریق به‏کارگیری مدل تعالی سازمانی 2020. مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی، 4(3)، 141-174.
حاجی غلام سریزدی، علی، رجب‏زاده قطری، علی، مشایخی، علی‏نقی، و حسن‏زاده، علیرضا. (1400). تبیین کارکردهای روش مدل‏سازی جمعی و گروهی در پویایی‏شناسی سیستم‏ها. مطالعات مدیریت صنعتی، 19(62)، 207-236.
حجازی، جلال، دوامی، پرویز، توحیدی، ناصر، حائریان اردکانی، علی، کریمی طاهری، علی، و محمودی، رضا. (1389). فناوری و دانش فنی. فصلنامه آموزش مهندسی ایران، 12(48)، 65-88.
حسن‏زاده، محمد. (1400). مدیریت دانش تحولی: نسل جدید مدیریت دانش برای تسهیلگری تحول دیجیتال. علوم و فنون مدیریت اطلاعات، 7(4)، 7-14.
حسین زاده بندقیری، عباس، طهماسبی لیمونی، صفیه، و اصغر رضوی، سید علی. (1403). طراحی و تبیین عوامل مؤثر بر قابلیت‏های نوآوری فناورانه (موردمطالعه: نهاد کتابخانه‏های عمومی کشور). نشریه علوم و فنون مدیریت اطلاعات، 10(3)، 115-138. https://doi.org/10.22091/stim.2021.6281.1488
خیرگو، منصور، و بیداله خانی، فریدون. (2019). طراحی الگوی نظام نوآوری در سازمان‏های دفاعی پژوهشی کیفی مبتنی بر نظریه داده بنیاد. مدیریت نوآوری در سازمان‏های دفاعی، 2(2)، 115-134.‎ https://doi.org/10.22034/qjimdo.2019.93812
دانشجووش، خاطره، جعفری، پریوش، و خمسه، عباس. (1399). چرخه تجاری‏سازی ایده‏های کارآفرینانه در شرکت‏های مبتنی بر فناوری پیشرفته. ابتکار و خلاقیت در علوم انسانی، 10(3)، 41-68.  https://doi.org/10.22034/qjimdo.2020.220505.1276
رضایی منش، محمد، نبی، سینا، و محمد نبی، ساویز. (1391). کاربرد مدیریت دانش در سنجش درجه‏ی بلوغ سازمانی. پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 27(4)، 985-1009.
شاکری، آرنوش، و عیوض زاده، الهام. (1399). بررسی تأثیر نوآوری‏های باز بر عملکرد نوآورانه اقتصادی و پایدار در واحدهای تحقیق و توسعه گروه مپنا. نوآوری و ارزش‏آفرینی، 9(18)، 45-62.
شفیعی نیک‏آبادی، محسن، جلیلی بوالحسنی، اعظم، خاتمی فیروزآبادی، سید علی. (1389). نقش نوآوری سازمانی در پیاده‏سازی کسب‏وکار الکترونیک در شرکت‏های مادر در صنعت خودرو. مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، 2(5)، 97-114.
طالبی، داود، اسماعیلی، محمدجواد، و معززی خواه طهران، آزاده. (1401). بررسی تأثیر قابلیت‏های مدیریت دانش بر عملکرد نوآوری با اثر میانجی نوآوری باز (موردمطالعه: پارک علم و فناوری پردیس). چشم‏انداز مدیریت صنعتی، 12(2)، 153-277.  https://doi.org/10.52547/jimp.12.2.253
عبدی نژاد، علی، تیموری، ابراهیم، و پورمحمدی، فهیمه. (1401). پیکربندی مجدد زنجیره‏ی تأمین هنگام توسعه‏ی محصول جدید با در نظر گرفتن راهکار جایگزینی دومحصولی (مطالعه‏ی موردی: صنعت هدفون). مهندسی صنایع و مدیریت، 38(1)، 25-35. https://doi.org/10.24200/j65.2021.55613.2118
کریمی یزدی، عبدالرسول، حقیقی، محمد، و ناطق، تهمینه. (1400). شناسایی و رتبه‏بندی راهبردهای آتی تجاری‏سازی فناوری‏های نوین در شرکت‏های دانش‏بنیان نوپا. آینده‏پژوهی مدیریت، 32(124)، 30-44. https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Journal/jmfr/Article/784871
کریمی، رضا و کریمیان، راحیل. (1403). ارائه چارچوب برای شناسایی تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر موفقیت‏های کسب‏وکارهای دانش‏بنیان با تمرکز بر فرایندهای مدیریت دانش. فصلنامه بازیابی دانش و نظام‏های معنایی، 12(44)، 61-80. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2025.83177.1682
کیانی‏قلعه‏سرد، ‏سروش، و رأفت، معصومه. (1400). کارایی تجاری‏سازی شرکت‏های رویشی مراکز رشد واحدهای فناور دانشگاهی ایران. زیست‏بوم نوآوری، 3(1)، 62-81.  https://doi.org/10.22111/innoeco.2021.6623
کرمی، محسن، الوانی، سید مهدی، خیراندیش، مهدی، زارع، حمید. (1402). طراحی مدل بهینه اجرای سیستم مدیریت دانش با رویکرد عوامل حیاتی موفقیت (موردمطالعه: صنایع خودروسازی گروه بهمن). پژوهش مدیریت منابع سازمانی، 13(4)، 147-172.
مردانی، مهدی. (1400). بررسی تأثیر رهبری تحول‏آفرین بر نوآوری سازمانی با در نظر گرفتن نقش میانجی یادگیری سازمانی در بین کارکنان شهرداری قزوین. رویکردهای پژوهشی نوین در مدیریت و حسابداری، 73(5)، 133-144.
مقصودی، مهرداد، الیاسی، مهدی، و خلیل‏نژاد، شهرام. (1400). نقش و رابطه نوآوری و محیط کسب‏و‏کار در ارتقای قدرت رقابت‏پذیری جهانی. مدیریت فردا، 68(20)، 139-152.‎
مهران ضیائیان، علی، مروتی شریف آب، سید حیدر، و میرفخرا، سید محمود زنجیرچ. (1402). بررسی چگونگی تأثیر مدیریت دانش در استقرار صنعت 4.0 در صنعت لوازم‏خانگی کشور. علوم و فنون مدیریت اطلاعات، 9(4)، 261-292‎.  https://doi.org/10.22091/stim.2023.8723.1888
References
Afandideh, N., Zarei Matin, H., Pourkarimi, J., & Rahmati, M. H. (2021). Identifying the components of a desirable organizational culture for the commercialization of research results at the University of Medical Sciences. Research in Medical Education, 13(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.22062/rme.2021.90901 [In Persian]
Afthanorhan, A., Ghazali, P. L., & Rashid, N. (2021). Discriminant validity: A comparison of CBSEM and consistent PLS using Fornell & Larcker and HTMT approaches. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1874(1), Article 012085. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1874/1/012085
Akbarzadeh, Z. (2019). Evaluating indicators of organizational agility by fuzzy multi criteria decision making (Iran Power Development Organization). Journal of Innovation and Value Creation. Advance online publication. http://journalie.ir/en/Article/305/FullText [In Persian]
Al Halbusi, H., Popa, S., Alshibani, S. M., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2025). Greening the future: Analyzing green entrepreneurial orientation, green knowledge management and digital transformation for sustainable innovation and circular economy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 28(5), 1916–1942. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2024-0169
Asadi, S. (2008). Report of a life. Akhtaran Publications. [In Persian]
Ashrafi Salim Kandi, F., Ghalavandi, H., & Ghaleei, A. (2021). The relationship between critical thinking and organizational innovation with the mediation of organizational ethics. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 16(1), 100–107. [In Persian]
Bavakhani, Z., Rezaei Sharifabadi, S., Ghaebi, A., & Najafi, M. (2020). Developing a model of organizational knowledge creation in Iranian knowledge-based companies. Library and Information Science, 23(1), 121–150. https://doi.org/10.30481/lis.2020.199360.1618 [In Persian]
Becerra-Fernandez, I., & Sabherwal, R. (2014). Knowledge management: Systems and processes (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315715117
Birami Erdy, M., Torani, H., Khalkhali, A., Shakibaei, Z., & Kazempour, E. (2019). Providing appropriate knowledge management model to improve the quality of learning students. School Administration, 7(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.34785/J010.1398.112 [In Persian]
Biranvand, S. M. I., & Akbarnjad, J. (2021). Examining the correlation between metrics derived from the activity of Iranian prolific authors in the field of business management on social-scientific networks and the scientometric indicators of databases. Quarterly of Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 8(26), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2021.58283.1409 [In Persian]
Biranvand, S. M. I., Rahmanian, S., & Akbarnjad, J. (2021). Identifying the dimensions and indicators of personal knowledge management in Fars Regional Water Authority. Academic Librarianship and Information Research, 55(2), 123–154. https://doi.org/10.22059/jlib.2022.332950.1572 [In Persian]
Daneshjoo, K., Jafari, P., & Khamseh, A. (2021). The commercialization cycle of entrepreneurial ideas in high-tech companies. Quarterly Journal of Innovation Management in Defense Organizations, 10(34), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.22034/qjimdo.2020.220505.1276 [In Persian]
Daniel, A. D., & Alves, L. (2020). University-industry technology transfer: The commercialization of university's patents. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(3), 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1638741
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press.
dos Santos, P. M., & Cirillo, M. Â. (2023). Construction of the average variance extracted index for construct validation in structural equation models with adaptive regressions.  Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 52 (4), 1639–1650. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2021.1888122
du Plessis, M., & Boon, J. A. (2004). Knowledge management in eBusiness and customer relationship management: South African case study findings. International Journal of Information Management, 24(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2003.10.002
Etabari, A., Naderi Beni, A. M., Al-Husseini Al-Madrasi, S. M. T., Sadeghi, M. H., & Hejazi, S. H. (2021). Analyzing the moderating role of temporal style compatibility on the relationship between customer participation and idea-to-product time in industrial marketing. Modern Marketing Research, 11(2), 169–198. https://doi.org/10.22108/nmrj.2021.126157.2311 [In Persian]
Ganguly, A., Talukdar, A., & Chatterjee, D. (2019). Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(6), 1105–1135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2018-0190
Haji Gholam Saryazdi, A., Rajabzadeh Qatari, A., Mashayekhi, A. N., & Hassanzadeh, A. (2021). Explaining the functions of group model building method in system dynamics. Journal of Industrial Management Studies, 19(62), 207–236. [In Persian]
Haji Sadeghi, Z. (2021). The relationship between organizational culture and organizational innovation with implementation of the post-modern management components (research in university: strategy for industry). Journal of Industry and University, 14(45), 47–62. [In Persian]
Han Yeon, J., Hyoung Jo, S., & Jang, S. H. (2022). A study of case analysis to strengthen technology commercialization capabilities. Advances in Dynamical Systems and Applications, 17(1), 21–36.
Harsono, T. W., Hidayat, K., Iqbal, M., & Abdillah, Y. (2025). Exploring the effect of transformational leadership and knowledge management in enhancing innovative performance: A mediating role of innovation capability. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 36(1), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2024-0125
Hasanzadeh, M. (2021). Transformational knowledge management: The new generation of knowledge management to facilitate digital transformation. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 7(4), 7–14. [In Persian]
Hejazi, R., Davami, M., Tohidi, A., Haerian Ardakani, A., Karimi Taheri, H., & Mahmoudi, M. (2011). Technology and technical know-how. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 12(48), 65–88. [In Persian]
Hervas-Oliver, J. L., & Sempere-Ripoll, F. (2015). Disentangling the influence of technological process and product innovations. Journal of Business Research, 68(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.010
Hosseinzadeh Bandaghiri, A., Tahmasebi Limooni, S., & Razavi, S. A. A. (2024). Design and explanation of factors affecting technological innovation capabilities (Case study: The Institution of Public Libraries). Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 10(3), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.22091/stim.2021.6281.1488 [In Persian]
Hox, J. J. (2021). Confirmatory factor analysis. In J. C. Barnes & D. R. Forde (Eds.), The encyclopedia of research methods in criminology and criminal justice (Vol. 2, pp. 830–832). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119111931.ch158
Hua, N., Zhang, T., Jahromi, M. F., & DeFranco, A. (2021). The speed of change and performance risk: Examining the impacts of IT spending in the US hotel industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 12(3), 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-07-2020-0180
Jiang, Z., Huo, M. L., Jones, J., Cheng, Z., Manoharan, A., & Spoehr, J. (2025). Thriving in future work: Knowledge management and innovation perspectives. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 23(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2024.2344347
Kalkan, A., Bozkurt, Ö. Ç., & Arman, M. (2014). The impacts of intellectual capital, innovation and organizational strategy on firm performance.  Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 700–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.025
Karami, M., Alvani, S. M., Kheirandish, M., & Zare, H. (2023). Designing an optimal model for implementing a knowledge management system with a critical success factors approach (Case study: Bahman Group automotive industries). Organizational Resource Management Research, 13(2), 147–172. [In Persian]
Karimi Yazdi, A., Haghighi, M., & Nategh, T. (2021). Identification and ranking of future strategies for commercialization of modern technologies in startup knowledge-based companies. Management Futurology, 32(124), 30-44. https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Journal/jmfr/Article/784871 [In Persian]
Karimi, R., & Karimian, R. (2025). A framework for identifying and analyzing factors affecting the success of knowledge-based businesses with a focus on knowledge management processes. Quarterly of Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 12(44), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2025.83177.1682 [In Persian]
Khairgoo, M., & Bidaleh Khani, F. (2019). Designing an innovation system model in defense research organizations: A qualitative study based on grounded theory. Innovation Management in Defense Organizations, 2(2), 115–134. [In Persian]
Kiani Ghaleh Sard, S., & Raft, M. (2021). Commercialization efficiency of vegetative companies in the technology incubators of Iranian academic units. Innovation Ecosystem, 3(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.22111/innoeco.2021.6623 [In Persian]
Kim, J. H., Seok, B. I., Choi, H. J., Jung, S. H., & Yu, J. P. (2020). Sustainable management activities: A study on the relations between technology commercialization capabilities, sustainable competitive advantage, and business performance. Sustainability, 12(19), Article 7913. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197913
Lin, W., Yang, Z., Papic, M., Logan, D. M., & Yu, J. (2022, June). A review of computational tools for composite system reliability analysis. In 2022 17th International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PMAPS53380.2022.9810596
Mardani, A. (2021). Investigating the impact of transformational leadership on organizational innovation considering the mediating role of organizational learning among employees of Qazvin Municipality. New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 5(73), 133–144. [In Persian]
Mardani, A., Nikoosokhan, S., Moradi, M., & Doustar, M. (2018). The relationship between knowledge management and innovation performance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.002
Masghoudi, K., Elyasi, M., & Khalilnejad, A. (2021). The role and relationship of innovation and business environment in enhancing global competitiveness power. Management Tomorrow, 20(68), 139–152. [In Persian]
Mehran Ziaian, A., Morovati Sharif Abad, A., Mirfakhra, S. H., & Zanjanchi, S. M. (2023). Investigating how knowledge management affects the deployment of Industry 4.0 in the home appliance industry. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 9(4), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.22091/stim.2023.8723.1888 [In Persian]
Peters, G. J. Y. (2014). The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: Why and how to abandon Cronbach's alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality. European Health Psychologist, 16(2), 56–69.
Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., & Santoso, T. I. (2021a). Analisis data penelitian marketing: Perbandingan hasil antara Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, dan SPSS untuk jumlah sampel besar. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 2(4), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.7777/jiemar.v2i4.180
Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., & Santoso, T. I. (2021b). Analisis data penelitian sosial dan manajemen: Perbandingan hasil antara Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, dan SPSS untuk jumlah sampel medium. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 2(4), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v2i4.50
Rezaei Manesh, M. N., Sina, M., & Saviz, M. (2012). Application of knowledge management in measuring organizational maturity degree. Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc), 27(4), 985–1009. [In Persian]
Riaz, M., Jie, W., Ali, Z., Sherani, M., & Yutong, L. (2025). Do knowledge-oriented leadership and knowledge management capabilities help firms to stimulate ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of technological turbulence. European Journal of Innovation Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-08-2022-0409
Rumanti, A. A., Samadhi, T. A., Wiratmadja, I. I., & Sunaryo, I. (2018, April). A systematic literature review on knowledge sharing for innovation: Empirical study approach. In 2018 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA) (pp. 504–509). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEA.2018.8387153
Samie, M. E., & Jazghani, F. (2022). Effect of knowledge management on innovative performance with the mediating effect of unlearning. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 52(3), 448–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-01-2022-0021
Sander, T., & Teh, P. L. (2014). SmartPLS for the human resources field to evaluate a model [Unpublished manuscript]. Department of Management, University of XYZ.
Satar, A., Musadieq, M. A., Hutahayan, B., & Solimun, S. (2025). Creating a sustainable competitive advantage: The roles of technological innovation, knowledge management, and organizational agility. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 44(3), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22280
Shafiee Nik Abadi, M., Jalili Bolhasani, A., & Khatami Firoozabadi, S. A. (2010). The role of organizational innovation in implementing e-business in parent companies of the automotive industry. Journal of Information Technology Management, 2(5), 97–114. [In Persian]
Shakeri, A., & Eivazzadeh, E. (2020). Investigating the impact of open innovations on sustainable economic innovative performance in R&D units of MAPNA Group. Journal of Innovation and Value Creation, 9(18), 45–62. [In Persian]
Shaukat, S., Nawaz, M. S., & Naz, S. (2013). Effects of innovation types on firm performance: An empirical study on Pakistan's manufacturing sector. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 7(2), 243–262.
Talebi, D., Esmaeili, M. J., & Mozazikhah Tehran, A. (2022). Investigating the impact of knowledge management capabilities on innovation performance with the mediating effect of open innovation (Case study: Pardis Technology Park). Journal of Improvement Management, 12(2), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.52547/jimp.12.2.253 [In Persian]
Tavalaei, A., Haghigi Boroujeni, M., Payam, H., & Khalili, A. (2021). Investigating the impact of knowledge management on strategic and operational performance of organizations by applying the EFQM 2020 excellence model. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 4(3), 141–174. [In Persian]
Tavallaee, R., Abdi Nejad, M., Teimouri, A., & Pourmohammadi, H. (2022). Reconfiguring the supply chain during new product development considering a dual-product substitution strategy (Case study: Headphone industry). Industrial Engineering and Management, 38(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.24200/j65.2021.55613.2118 [In Persian]
Zamani, S. G., & Shakib Monesh, H. (2019). The status of the legitimate expectations principle in the World Trade Organization. Public Law Research, 21(64), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2019.21762.1513 [In Persian]
Zarei, A., Eshaghi, M., & Farokhizadeh, F. (2021). Investigating the effect of open innovation factors on organizational strategy and performance (Case study: Tehran Region 1 Municipality). Quarterly Journal of Industrial Technology Development, 19(46), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.22034/jtd.2021.248881 [In Persian]