نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه آموزشی علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده مدیریت اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش ارائه مدل مزیت رقابتی مبتنی بر مدیریت دانش در موسسه نوین دانش‌پژوهان است. این پژوهش از نوع کاربردی بوده و با روش کمی انجام شد. جمع‌آوری اطلاعات با استفاده از روش‌های اسنادی و پیمایشی انجام گرفت. جامعه آماری این تحقیق را 30 نفر از کارمندان موسسه نوین دانش‌پژوهان تشکیل داده است. سؤالات پرسشنامه پژوهش حاضر طبق مقیاس پنج‌گزینه‌ای لیکرت و با بهره‌گیری از پرسشنامه استاندارد مدیریت دانش شرون لاوسون (2003) تدوین شد که روایی و پایایی آن بررسی و مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها و ارائه مدل مناسب از روش‌های آماری- توصیفی میانگین، انحراف معیار، همبستگی پیرسون و آزمون ناپارامتریک اسمیرنف کولموگروف و نرم‌افزارهای موردنیاز استفاده شد. با توجه به نتایج به‌دست‌آمده مشخص شد که سطح معناداری مزیت رقابتی با مؤلفه‌های مدیریت دانش، نشان‌دهنده ارتباط معنادار میان آن‌ها است. طبق یافته‌های معادلات ساختاری نیز مشخص شد که تمامی مؤلفه‌های مدیریت دانش با مزیت رقابتی دارای ارتباط معنادار بودند. علاوه بر آن طبق شاخص‌های بررسی‌شده، مدل به‌دست‌آمده دارای برازش مناسبی است. با توجه به نتایج بیان‌شده مدیریت دانش و مؤلفه‌های آن، به‌عنوان اجزا و عناصر مهم بقای سازمان و حفظ موقعیت رقابتی آن موردتوجه قرار گرفته‌اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Competitive Advantage Model Based on Knowledge Management in Novin Daneshpajoohan Institute

نویسندگان [English]

  • setareh parian
  • Mohammad Hassanzadeh
  • Atefeh Sharif

Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction

In recent years, the role of knowledge as one of the most important strategic resources of organizations has received more attention than ever before. Contemporary business environments are faced with a high rate of change, intense competition, and the need for continuous innovation, and organizations that can create, store, transfer, and apply knowledge are more successful. In such a context, knowledge management, as a core organizational capability, can be effective in creating and maintaining competitive advantage. Recent studies in the field of strategic management and knowledge systems show that organizations are able to establish their competitive position when their knowledge processes are structured and based on support systems. Therefore, the present study aims to provide a comprehensive model to explain the relationship between knowledge management components and competitive advantage in the New Institute of Scholars.
This research seeks to answer the question of to what extent the various knowledge management processes, including knowledge creation, acquisition, storage, dissemination, and application, can help improve organizational performance and enhance the competitive advantage of the organization, and whether a suitable model can be provided for analyzing these relationships.
Research hypotheses
In this study, the impact of knowledge management components on competitive advantage is measured as follows:

There is a significant effect between knowledge management and competitive advantage in the New Institute of Scholars.
There is a significant effect between the knowledge production component of knowledge management and competitive advantage in the New Institute of Scholars.
There is a significant effect between the knowledge acquisition component of knowledge management and competitive advantage in the New Institute of Scholars.
There is a significant effect between the knowledge storage component of knowledge management and competitive advantage in the New Institute of Scholars.
There is a significant effect between the knowledge dissemination component of knowledge management and competitive advantage in the New Institute of Scholars.
There is a significant effect between the knowledge application component of knowledge management and competitive advantage in the New Institute of Scholars.
Literature Review

The existing theoretical background indicates that knowledge management is one of the main tools for realizing innovation, organizational learning, and continuous improvement. Recent studies also emphasize that knowledge management not only improves organizational decision-making, but also plays a key role in strengthening key capabilities of organizations, including product development, process improvement, and promoting intra-organizational interactions. Research published in the past three years shows that organizations that fully implement the knowledge management cycle perform significantly better in terms of service quality, organizational agility, and rapid response to environmental changes.
According to new findings, knowledge management has the greatest impact on competitive advantage when it is synergistic with organizational structure, learning culture, and innovative approaches. Therefore, a detailed examination of the relationships between knowledge management dimensions and competitive advantage can lead to the presentation of models that guide organizations on the path of sustainable development and improving effectiveness. Based on such a gap and research need, the present study aims to present a native model based on real data from the Novin Daneshpojohan Institute.

Methodology

This research is an applied research type and its method is a quantitative study. The statistical population of this study consists of 30 employees of the Novin Daneshpojohan Institute (due to the small number of these people and at the discretion of the supervisor, sampling was not carried out and the entire population was examined). Data collection was carried out using documentary and survey methods. The main tool was the Sharon Lawson (2003) Standard Knowledge Management Questionnaire, which has been used in various studies over the years and its compatibility with the organizational environment has been confirmed in numerous studies.
The questions of the present research questionnaire were developed according to the five-point Likert scale and using the Sharon Lawson (2003) Standard Knowledge Management Questionnaire, whose validity was examined and confirmed by experts in this field, and its reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.871). SPSS software was used to analyze the data, and PLS software (and Q2, SRMR, NFI and GOF indices) was used to provide an appropriate model, as well as the descriptive statistical methods of mean, standard deviation, Pearson correlation, and nonparametric Smirnov-Kolmogorov test.

Results

According to the results obtained from the Pearson test, it was determined that the significance level of competitive advantage with the components of knowledge management (including creation, acquisition, storage, dissemination and application of knowledge) was less than 0.05, which indicates a significant relationship between them. These results indicate that each of the dimensions of knowledge has an effective role in promoting the competitive advantage of the institution.
In addition, according to the findings of structural equations, it was also determined that the t-value of all hypotheses is greater than 1.96, and as a result, all components of knowledge management have a significant relationship with competitive advantage. This finding clearly shows that knowledge management has a positive and significant effect on competitive advantage and its various components play a direct role in strengthening the competitive position of the organization. The fit indices also showed that the proposed model has a suitable and reliable fit and can be used as a valid model for analyzing the effects of knowledge management on competitive advantage.

Discussion

The results of this study, in line with recent studies, show that knowledge management as an organizational capability can significantly affect the performance and competitive advantage of organizations. The findings indicate that strengthening the processes of knowledge creation and acquisition keeps the organization up to date; storing and disseminating knowledge leads to the stability and correct transfer of information; and the application of knowledge is the final loop of value creation that leads to better decision-making and improved services.
The relationship analysis shows that knowledge-based organizations have a greater advantage in terms of innovation, response to changes, and provision of quality services compared to organizations that lack knowledge management structures. Given that the New Institute of Scholars has been trying to improve the level of performance and stakeholder satisfaction in recent years, paying attention to knowledge management can facilitate the path to achieving long-term organizational goals. The findings emphasize that investing in information technology, employee training, and developing information infrastructure can play an effective role in strengthening the knowledge management cycle.

Conclusion

The present study aimed to present a model for analyzing the relationship between knowledge management and competitive advantage, and the results indicate that knowledge management is one of the key elements of organizational survival and growth. All components of knowledge management play an influential and meaningful role in promoting competitive advantage, and organizations that implement this cycle completely and integratedly will have a greater ability to face competition and environmental changes. The model presented in this study can be used by managers of the New Institute for Scholars and other similar organizations as a valid framework for planning, decision-making, and implementing knowledge strategies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • knowledge management
  • competitive advantage
  • Novin Daneshpajoohan Institute
احمدی، یوسف رضا، ذاکری، امیر، رضوی، فاطمه، و صارمی، محمد صادق. (1403). بررسی عوامل تأثیرگذار بر اشتراک‌گذاری دانش در روابط بین سازمانی مشارکتی (موردمطالعه: سامانه نظام مراقبت اجتماعی دانش‌آموزان). . فصلنامه بازیابی دانش و نظام‌های معنایی، 11(40)، 81-112. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2023.75408.1602
انصاری، منوچهر، رحمانی یوشانلویی، حسین، رحمانی، کمال‏الدین، پاسبانی، محمد، و عسگری، محمدعلی. (1392). ارائه مدل مفهومی تاثیر موفقیت پیاده‏سازی مدیریت دانش بر کسب مزیت رقابتی در شرکت‏های کوچک و متوسط (SMEs). مدیریت بازرگانی، 5(1)، 21-40. https://doi.org/10.22059/jibm.2013.35422
ایرانبان، سیدجواد. (1396). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی عوامل موثر بر استقرار مدیریت دانش و رابطه آن با مزیت رقابتی و عملکرد سازمانی. فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی، 8(2)، 141-127.https://civilica.com/doc/1913789
حسن‌زاده، محمد. (1386). مدیریت دانش: مفاهیم و زیرساخت‌ها. تهران: انتشارات کتابدار.
رمضانپور نصیرمحله، احمد، و همایون فر، مهدی. (1399). تبیین نقش میانجی نوآوری در رابطه مدیریت دانش‌ و مزیت رقابتی شرکت‌های کوچک و متوسط با رویکرد شبکه عصبی و مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی، 12(24)، 43-69. https://doi.org/10.22080/jem.2021.17623.3046
سیری، ریحانه، و اسماعیلی قلات، بهلول. (1394). جایگاه مدیریت دانش در کسب مزیت رقابتی سازمان‌ها. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی چالش‌های جهان، 1(3)، 63-91. https://elmnet.ir/doc/2257271-29358
سیف‌اللهی، ناصر، حاضری، هاتف، و آسوده، علی. (1398). بررسی تاثیر مدیریت دانش و نوآوری فناورانه بر خلق مزیت رقابتی (نمونه پژوهش: شرکت‌های تولیدی پارس خزر و پارس شهاب). نشریه مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی، 2(5)، 12-53. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.26454262.1398.2.2.1.6
عبدلی مسینان، فائزه، رودساز، حبیب، و سید نقوی، میرعلی. (1399). تاثیر نوآوری باز بر مزیت رقابتی با نقش میانجیگری مدیریت دانش. مطالعات مدیریت صنعتی، 18(59)، 117-150. https://doi.org/10.22054/jims.2018.26323.1903
فراهانی، حسن. (1388). مدیریت دانش و کارکردهای آن در سازمان‌ها. معرفت، 18(2)، 97-114. https://www.magiran.com/p622364
فلاح، محمدرضا. (1397). شناسایی و تبیین پیش‌آیندهای توانمندسازی منابع انسانی با رویکرد مدیریت دانش. فصلنامۀ پژوهش‌های مدیریت منابع انسانی، 10(1)، 160-133. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.82548002.1397.10.1.6.9
قوی‌پنجه، مهدی، و سلیمانی روزبهانی، فاطمه. (1394). نقش و تاثیر مدیریت دانش در ایجاد مزیت رقابتی پایدار در سازمان‌ها. کنفرانس بین‌المللی پژوهش‌های نوین در مدیریت و مهندسی صنایع. https://civilica.com/doc/435158
کریمی، رضا، و کریمیان، راحیل. (1404). ارائه چارچوب برای شناسایی تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر موفقیت‌های کسب‌وکارهای دانش‌بنیان با تمرکز بر فرایندهای مدیریت دانش. فصلنامه بازیابی دانش و نظام‌های معنایی، 12(44)، 139-97. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2025.83177.1682
کنجکاومنفرد، امیررضا، سعیدا اردکانی، سعید، ملک‌پور، لیلا، باروت کوب، محمدرضا، و محب علی مالمیری، میلاد. (1399). واکاوی تأثیر عوامل پذیرش نوآوری فناورانه و تعهد منابع بر قابلیت‌های مدیریت ‌دانش به‌منظور افزایش مزیت رقابتی (نمونه پژوهش: شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان استان یزد). فصلنامه مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی، 3(10)، 147-175. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2020.1211
محبیان، امیرعباس، اسماعیل‌پور، منصور، بیات، بهروز، محمدزاده علمداری، مهرداد، و اسفندیاری مقدم، علیرضا. (1404). ارائه طرح پیاده‌سازی مدیریت دانش با استفاده از فناوری بلاک‌چین (مطالعه موردی: جهاد دانشگاهی). فصلنامه بازیابی دانش و نظام‌های معنایی، 12(44)، 68-35. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2024.79806.1654
مزارعی، نسترن، و ثابت، عباس. (1399). بررسی ارتباط بین رفتار شهروندی سازمانی با مزیت رقابتی بر اساس نقش میانجی تسهیم دانش. فصلنامه علمی تخصصی رویکردهای پژوهشی نوین در مدیریت و حسابداری، 4(36)، 13-23. https://www.majournal.ir/index.php/ma/article/view/422
منوریان، عباس. (1385). مدیریت دانش و دانایی. کار و جامعه، 74-73، 4-34.
References
Abdoli Mesinan, F., Rudsaz, H., & Seyed Naqavi, M. A. (2020). The effect of open innovation on competitive advantage with the mediating role of knowledge management. Industrial Management Studies, 18(59), 117–150. https://doi.org/10.22054/jims.2018.26323.1903 [In Persian]
Adli, F. (2004). Knowledge management: Move beyond knowledge. The Metacognitive Knowledge Publication. [In Persian]
Afrazeh, A. (2002). Comprehensive information quality management in knowledge management [Paper presentation]. International Conference of Quality Managers, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]
Agha, S., Alrubaiee, L., & Jamhour, M. (2012). Effect of core competence on competitive advantage and organizational performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(1), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n1p192
Ansari, M., Rahmani Youshanlouei, H., Rahmani, K., Pasbani, M., & Asgari, M. A. (2013). Presenting a model the effects of knowledge management enablers in order to gain competitive advantages SMEs. Business Management, 5(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.22059/jibm.2013.35422 [In Persian]
Boiko, V., Kwilinski, A., Misiuk, M., & Boiko, L. (2019). Competitive advantages of wholesale markets of agricultural products as a type of entrepreneurial activity: The experience of Ukraine and Poland. Economic Annals-XXI, 175(1-2), 68–72. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v175-12
Chawla, A., & Saxena, S. (2012). Knowledge management enablers: A comparative study of traditional and technical universities. International Journal of Computational Engineering & Management, 15(2), 81–86.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/348772.348775
Din, N., & Haron, S. (2012). Knowledge sharing as culture among Malaysian online social networking users. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.104
Fallah, M. R. (2018). Identifying and explaining the antecedents of human resource empowerment with knowledge management approach. Journal of Human Resources Management Research, 10(1), 133–160. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.82548002.1397.10.1.6.9 [In Persian]
Farahani, H. (2009). Knowledge management and its functions in the organization. Knowledge, 137, 45–52. [In Persian]
Ge, B., Yang, Y., Jiang, D., Gao, Y., Du, X., & Zhou, T. (2018). An empirical study on green innovation strategy and sustainable competitive advantages: Path and boundary. Sustainability, 10(10), Article 3631. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103631
Ginting, Y. M. (2020). Intellectual capital investigation in achieving sustainable competitive advantages in the creative industry: Does the mediation of knowledge management system affect? Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 23(2), 111–126.
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
Heisig, P. (2009). Harmonisation of knowledge management: Comparing 160 KM frameworks around the globe. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(4), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910971798
Joshi, K. D., & Sarker, S. (2007). Knowledge transfer within information systems development teams: Examining the role of knowledge source attributes. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 322–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.10.003
Khojastehpour, A., Al-Dawood, S. H., & Saemi Siddiq, H. (2011). Knowledge management process for continuous innovation. Labor and Society Monthly, 135, 45–95. [In Persian]
Khorakian, A., Kadkhoda, N., & Mollazadeh Yazdani, B. (2017). A study of the role of intellectual capital on innovative behavior with emphasis on the mediating role of knowledge sharing (Case study of the Air-Sun Research Institute). Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 101–134. [In Persian]
Lee, V. H., Foo, A. T. L., Leong, L. Y., & Ooi, K. B. (2016). Can competitive advantage be achieved through knowledge management? A case study on SMEs. Expert Systems with Applications, 65, 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.042
Mahdi, O. R., Nassar, I. A., & Almsafir, M. K. (2019). Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities. Journal of Business Research, 94, 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.013
Mathews, J. A. (2002). Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020586223665
Mazaree, N., & Sabet, A. (2020). Investigating the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and competitive advantage based on the mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 4(36), 13–23. [In Persian]
Monavarian, A. (2006). Knowledge management. Work and Society, 73–74, 4–34. [In Persian]
Nielsen, A. P. (2006). Understanding dynamic capabilities through knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(4), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610679363
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
Ramazanpour Nasir Mahalla, A., & Homayoun Far, M. (2020). Explaining the mediating role of innovation in relationship between knowledge management and competitive advantage of SMEs using neural network and structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Executive Management, 12(24), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.22080/jem.2021.17623.3046 [In Persian]
Salunke, S., Weerawardena, J., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2013). Competing through service innovation: The role of bricolage and entrepreneurship in project-oriented firms. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.03.005
Sandhawalia, B. S., & Dalcher, D. (2011). Developing knowledge management capabilities: A structured approach. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111119718
Sohrabi, B., & Darmi, H. (2018). Knowledge management (with MBA approach). [Publisher information missing]. [In Persian]
Wijaya, P. Y., & Suasih, N. N. R. (2020). The effect of knowledge management on competitive advantage and business performance: A study of silver craft SMEs. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(4), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.15678/eber.2020.080406
Wiig, K. M. (2007). Effective societal knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(5), 141–158. [Note: The original URL for this reference could not be verified]