رفتار جستجوی معنایی اطلاعات در پایگاه اطلاعاتی پاب‌مِد در زمینه کووید-19 بر اساس مدل شناختی اینگورسن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه آموزشی علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران.

چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر تحلیل رفتار جستجوی معنایی اطلاعات اعضای هیئت‌علمی بیمارستان شهید مدرس در پایگاه اطلاعاتی پاب‌مِد در زمینه کووید-19 بر اساس مدل شناختی اینگورسن است. پژوهش حاضر از نوع کاربردی با رویکرد کمی و روش پیمایشی توصیفی-تحلیلی انجام شد. جامعه آماری شامل اعضای هیئت‌علمی بیمارستان شهید مدرس بود. ابزار پژوهش پرسش‌نامه محقق ساخته است. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزار اس.پی.اس.اس. (ورژن 25) استفاده شد. حدود ۵۲% پاسخگویان از پیشنهادهای خودکار کلیدواژه در پاب‌مِد رضایت دارند. ۶۷% با استفاده از فیلتر موضوعات اصلی مش موافق‌اند، اما تنها ۴۴% از زیرعنوان‌های موضوعی به‌عنوان ابزار دقیق‌تر برای جستجوی معنایی استفاده می‌کنند. ابزار PICO با 2/35% موافق جایگاه ضعیفی در رفتار جستجویی کاربران دارد. نزدیک به ۶۰% بر نقش مترادف‌ها در غنای جستجو تأکید دارند. 6/68% کلیدواژه‌های پیشنهادی را به‌عنوان ابزاری برای توسعه جستجوی معنایی خود مفید می‌دانند و 6/79% چکیده‌ها را کلید ارزیابی مرتبط بودن نتایج می‌شناسند. همچنین، تفاوت معنی‌داری در رفتار جستجوی معنایی بر اساس رتبه دانشگاهی، سابقه خدمت، و رتبه تخصص و فوق‎تخصص وجود دارد. تفاوت بر اساس جنسیت معنی‌دار نیست. رفتار جستجوی کاربران علاوه بر ویژگی‌های سامانه بازیابی، تحت‌تأثیر عوامل شناختی فردی و نیز بسترهای اجتماعی و سازمانی قرار دارد؛ بنابراین تقویت آموزش مهارت‌های جستجوی پیشرفته و آشنایی با ابزارهای مفهومی پاب‌مِد می‌تواند به بهبود کیفیت جستجوهای معنایی، افزایش کارایی بازیابی و حمایت مؤثرتر از تصمیم‌گیری‌های علمی و بالینی منجر شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Information Semantic Search Behavior in PubMed on the Topic of COVID-19 Based on Ingwersen's Cognitive Model

نویسندگان English

Roghayeh KAzemi Ashlaghi
Amir Ghaebi
Elaheh Hosseini
Department of Information Science, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction
Semantic search behavior refers to a set of cognitive and practical processes and actions undertaken by users during information searching, in which the individual goes beyond mere word matching to understand and retrieve information based on meaning, concept, and conceptual relationships among terms. The purpose of this study was to analyze the semantic information search behavior of faculty members at Shahid Modarres Hospital in PubMed regarding COVID-19, based on Ingwersen's model.
Research Questions
1. How does the semantic search behavior for COVID-19 information in PubMed by faculty members of Shahid Modarres Hospital occur based on the 'information retrieval systems' component in Ingwersen's cognitive model?
2. How does the semantic search behavior for COVID-19 information in PubMed by faculty members of Shahid Modarres Hospital occur based on the 'identification of information content' component in Ingwersen's cognitive model?
3. How does the semantic search behavior for COVID-19 information in PubMed by faculty members of Shahid Modarres Hospital occur based on the 'user interface' component in Ingwersen's cognitive model?
4. How does the semantic search behavior for COVID-19 information in PubMed by faculty members of Shahid Modarres Hospital occur based on the 'cognitive space' component in Ingwersen's cognitive model?
5. How does the semantic search behavior for COVID-19 information in PubMed by faculty members of Shahid Modarres Hospital occur based on the 'social/organizational environment' component in Ingwersen's cognitive model?
Literature Review
Previous studies indicate that information search behavior and semantic search are influenced by individual, systemic, and contextual factors. Shohrati (2022) reported that physicians and nurses made the most use of the PubMed database for searching COVID-19-related information, and their primary objectives included understanding the virus, fulfilling information needs, and sharing information. Khoshian et al. (2024) showed that although semantic search has moderate performance in conceptual connectivity and retrieval of multi-word concepts, it contributes to improving information retrieval. Khosravi et al. (2015) found no significant difference between PubMed's suggested keywords and MeSH terms in terms of result relevance, although both contribute to the development of search vocabulary. Lazarus et al. (2020) demonstrated that combined strategies based on free text and MeSH yield the highest sensitivity in retrieving COVID-19 articles. Furthermore, studies by Das and Saha (2019), Nemeshaev et al. (2021), and Shiri & Revie (2006) have emphasized the role of semantic search, ontology, and user experience in enhancing retrieval accuracy and improving query expansion.


Methodology
The present study is applied in terms of purpose and was conducted with a quantitative approach using a descriptive-analytical survey method. The research population consisted of 64 faculty members of Shahid Modarres Hospital. Due to the limited size of the population, no sampling was performed, and 54 questionnaires were collected (response rate of 84%). The data collection instrument was a researcher-developed questionnaire designed based on Ingwersen's cognitive model and the semantic search capabilities of PubMed. The content validity of the instrument was reviewed and confirmed by experts in information retrieval, semantic search, and clinical librarianship, and its reliability was obtained with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.80. Data were collected both in-person and online and were analyzed using SPSS software version 25.
Results
Faculty members actively use PubMed's semantic search features, including simple search, auto-suggestions, term refinement, combined strategies, MeSH (especially Major Topics), synonyms, and suggested keywords. While they are generally satisfied with PubMed's layout, use of frameworks like PICO and advanced indexing tools (e.g., Show Index List) is limited. Abstracts are the primary tool for assessing relevance, while personalized features like My NCBI are underutilized. Users rely on full texts for conceptual understanding, with less use of citation tools. Boolean operators and user-friendliness are rated favorably. Search behavior is influenced by scientific, research, and clinical needs, prior experience, database awareness, and the need for authoritative information. PubMed helps reduce uncertainty and supports decision-making. Organizational factors such as infrastructure, library services, and professional priorities also shape search behavior. Significant differences in semantic search behavior were found based on academic rank, years of service, and expertise, but not by gender.
Discussion
The research findings indicate that faculty members largely utilize PubMed's semantic capacities for search development. This result is consistent with the study by Khoshian et al. (2024), which confirmed the role of semantic search in accessing more relevant scientific information. Additionally, the use of MeSH and PubMed's suggested keywords aligns with the findings of Khosravi et al. (2015), who considered these tools effective in expanding users' vocabulary range.
Despite the appropriate use of some semantic capabilities, the results showed that more advanced tools such as MeSH Subheadings, Show Index List, and the PICO framework have not yet been fully institutionalized in users' search behavior. This finding is consistent with the results of studies by Eriksen & Frandsen (2018) and Fineout-Overholt et al. (2024) regarding the limited use of structured search frameworks by users. The limited use of personalized features such as My NCBI indicates that a portion of this database's individual knowledge management capacities has not yet been fully utilized.
According to Ingwersen's cognitive model, the results confirm that semantic search behavior is not merely a function of system features, but rather the interaction among users' cognitive characteristics, professional goals, and organizational environment also plays a role in its formation. Search experience, information needs, and users' scientific and clinical objectives determine the path of selecting search strategies.


Conclusion
The results of this study showed that the semantic search behavior of faculty members in PubMed is the result of the interaction among system capabilities, users' cognitive factors, and socio-organizational conditions. Although users make good use of basic features and some of PubMed's semantic tools, there is a need for further training in utilizing advanced tools such as MeSH Subheadings, PICO, indexing features, and personalized capabilities. Accordingly, designing targeted educational programs to enhance semantic search skills, developing visual guides for the use of search frameworks, and strengthening the role of clinical librarians can lead to improved information retrieval quality and more effective support for scientific and clinical decision-making.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Faculty Members
PubMed
Shahid Modarres Hospital
Semantic Search Behavior
COVID-19
Ingwersen's Cognitive Model
امان‌اللهی، علیرضا، فارسی، زهرا، و زارعیان، آرمین. (۱۳۹۳). اولویت‌ها و اعتبار منابع اطلاعاتی مورداستفاده از دیدگاه اعضای هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی آجا: تحلیل محتوا. دوفصلنامه مطالعات آموزشی نما آجا، ۳(۱)، ۱–۱۰. http://nama.jaums.ac.ir/article-۱-۹۶-fa.html
امیری، محمدرضا، و سلامی، مریم. (۱۳۹۲). کاربرد هستی‌شناسی‌های وب معنایی در نظام‌های اطلاع‌رسانی پزشکی. مجله علمی پژوهان، ۱۲(۱)، ۱–۱۰. http://psj.msha.ac.ir/article-۱-۴۲-fa.html
حسن‌زاده، محمد، و رضازاده، الهام. (۱۳۸۷). ارزیابی ربط در نظام‌های ذخیره و بازیابی اطلاعات از رهیافت شناختی. کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، ۱۱(۲)، ۵۳–۷۰. https://lis.qr-libjournal.ir/article_43765.html
خسروی، عبدالرسول، پوش، زهرا، و ارسطوپور، شعله. (۱۳۹۴). بررسی کارآمدی کلیدواژه‌ها و عبارت‌های پیشنهادی پاب‌مِد نسبت به اصطلاحات مش از دیدگاه کاربران حوزه پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بوشهر. پژوهش‌نامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، ۳۰(۳)، ۶۹۷–۷۱۷. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2015.029
خوشیان، ناهید، برادر، رؤیا، و غائبی، امیر. (۱۴۰۲). جستجوی معنایی از نظر پدیدآورندگان ایرانیِ مقالات پژوهشی در زمینه کوویدـ۱۹ نمایه‌شده در پایگاه پاب‌مِد. کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، ۲۷(۱)، ۶۳–۸۸. https://doi.org/10.30481/lis.2023.379865.2040
سعیدی‌زاده، مرضیه، و طاهری، ابوالفضل. (۱۳۹۵). معیارهای تعامل در فرایند جستجوی اطلاعات مبتنی بر وظایف کاری (نقش پیچیدگی عینی و نوع محصول). پژوهش‌نامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، ۳۱(۴)، ۹۳۱–۹۵۲. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2016.032
شهرتی، محبوبه. (۱۴۰۱). اطلاع‌یابی پزشکان و پرستاران در دوره همه‌گیری کووید (مطالعه موردی در بیمارستان‌های شهید مدرس و مسیح دانشوری شهر تهران در سال ۱۳۹۹) ] پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه الزهرا. [
صفری، ناهید، میرحسینی، زهره، و اباذری، زهرا. (۱۴۰۴). تحلیل رفتار اطلاع‌یابی پژوهشگران در حوزه هنر. فصلنامه بازیابی دانش و نظام‌های معنایی، ۱۲(۴۲)، ۲۱۹–۲۴۶. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2025.84074.1694
طاهری، مهدی. (۱۳۹۴). ذخیره و بازیابی اطلاعات و دانش با تأکید بر رویکردهای نوین. کتابدار: کنسرسیوم محتوای ملی.
کریمی، الهام، بابایی، محمود، و حسینی بهشتی، ملوک‌السادات. (۱۳۹۸). بررسی ویژگی‌های معنایی و هستی‌شناسانه نظام‌های بازیابی اطلاعات مبتنی بر اصطلاح‌نامه و هستی‌شناسی. پژوهش‌نامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، ۳۴(۴)، ۱۵۸۵–۱۶۱۲. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2019.015
کوارویی، رعنا، مؤمنی، عصمت، و حاجی زین‌العابدینی، محسن. (۱۳۹۴). بررسی رابطه راهبردهای شناختی و فراشناختی با رفتار اطلاع‌جویی. فصلنامه بازیابی دانش و نظام‌های معنایی، ۲(۵)، ۵۹–۷۸. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2016.2699
میرعرب، علی. (۱۴۰۲). بررسی راهکارهای جستجو و بازیابی معنایی متون فارسی و عربی. علوم و فنون مدیریت اطلاعات، ۹(۴)، ۱۸۵–۲۰۴. https://doi.org/10.22091/stim.2024.10402.2067
نیک‌نیا، معصومه. (۱۳۹۵). داده‌های پیوندی و تعامل کاربر: مسیری روبه‌جلو. فصلنامه نقد و بررسی کتاب، ۳(۱۰)، ۱۸۱–۱۹۳.
هلاکویان، سیده نجمه، بهزادی، حسن، و ارسطوپور، شعله. (۱۴۰۵). تأثیر تحریف‌های شناختی بر بازیابی اطلاعات: یک تحلیل رفتاری در مراحل مختلف جستجو. فصلنامه بازیابی دانش و نظام‌های معنایی، ۱۲(۴۵)، ۱–۳۴. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2025.86648.1727
References
Abbott, R., Bethel, A., Rogers, M., Whear, R., Orr, N., Shaw, L., ... & Thompson Coon, J. (2022). Characteristics, quality and volume of the first 5 months of the COVID-19 evidence synthesis infodemic: A meta-research study. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 27(3), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111710
Allahim, A., Cherif, A., & Imine, A. (2025). Semantic approaches for query expansion: Taxonomy, challenges, and future research directions. PeerJ Computer Science, 11, Article e2664. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2664
Amanollahi, A., Farsi, Z., & Zareian, A. (2014). Priorities and credibility of information resources used from the perspective of faculty members of AJA University of Medical Sciences: A content analysis. Biannual Journal of Nama Educational Studies AJA, 3(1), 1–10. http://nama.jaums.ac.ir/article-1-96-fa.html [In Persian]
Amiri, M. R., & Salami, M. (2013). The application of semantic web ontologies in medical information systems. Pajouhan Scientific Journal, 12(1), 1–10. http://psj.msha.ac.ir/article-1-42-fa.html [In Persian]
Bi, R. (2025). An adaptive semantic retrieval framework for digital libraries integrating graph neural networks, ontology, and user behavior. Scientific Reports, 15(1), Article 40528. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24276-1
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Connell, E. O., McCarroll, N., Rani, S., Curran, K., McNamee, E., Clist, A., & Brammer, A. (2025). Evaluating semantic representation strategies for robust information retrieval matching. Digital Technologies Research and Applications, 4(3), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.54963/dtra.v4i3.1564
Das, A., & Saha, D. (2019). A novel approach to enhance the performance of semantic search in Bengali using neural net and other classification techniques. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1911.01256
Eller, D. W. (2022). Transparency and the future of semantic searching in academic libraries. Information Services and Use, 42(3-4), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-220177
Eriksen, M. B., & Frandsen, T. F. (2018). The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: A systematic review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.345
Fatehi, F., Gray, L. C., & Wootton, R. (2014). How to improve your PubMed/MEDLINE searches: 3. Advanced searching, MeSH and My NCBI. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 20(2), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X13519036
Fineout-Overholt, E., Hays, D., Farus-Brown, S., Zonsius, M. C., & Milner, K. A. (2024). Removing persistent barriers to systematic searching. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 124(7), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0001025648.00669.e7
Hassanzadeh, M., & Rezazadeh, E. (2008). Relevance assessment in information storage and retrieval systems from a cognitive approach. Librarianship and Information, 11(2), 53–70. https://lis.qr-libjournal.ir/article_43765.html [In Persian]
Halakouyan, S. N., Behzadi, H., & Arastoopour, S. (2026). The effect of cognitive distortions on information retrieval: A behavioral analysis at different stages of searching. Quarterly Journal of Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 12(45), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2025.86648.1727 [In Persian]
Ingwersen, P. (1996). Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: Elements of a cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation, 52(1), 3–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026960
Ingwersen, P. (1999). Cognitive information retrieval. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 3–52. https://peteringwersen.info/publications/2330_ingwersen_arist34-finalprint.pdf
Karimi, E., Babaei, M., & Hosseini Beheshti, M. S. (2019). Investigating the semantic and ontological features of thesaurus-based and ontology-based information retrieval systems. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 34(4), 1585–1612. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2019.015 [In Persian]
Kavaroie, R., Momeni, E., & Haji Zzynolabedini, M. (2016). A survey of the relationship between cognitive and metacognitive strategies and information seeking behavior. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 2(5), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2016.2699 [In Persian]
Khooshian, N., Baradar, R., & Ghaebi, A. (2024). Semantic search from viewpoints of Iranian authors of scientific publications on COVID-19 indexed in PubMed. Library and Information Sciences, 27(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.30481/lis.2023.379865.2040 [In Persian]
Khosravi, A., Poush, Z., & Arastoopour, S. (2015). Investigating the efficiency of PubMed's suggested keywords and phrases compared to MeSH terms from the perspective of medical users of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 30(3), 697–717. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2015.029 [In Persian]
Lazarus, J. V., Palayew, A., Rasmussen, L. N., Andersen, T. H., Nicholson, J., & Norgaard, O. (2020). Searching PubMed to retrieve publications on the COVID-19 pandemic: Comparative analysis of search strings. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(11), Article e23449. https://doi.org/10.2196/23449
Massonnaud, C. R., Kerdelhué, G., Grosjean, J., Lelong, R., Griffon, N., & Darmoni, S. J. (2020). Identification of the best semantic expansion to query PubMed through automatic performance assessment of four search strategies on all medical subject heading descriptors: Comparative study. JMIR Medical Informatics, 8(6), Article e12799. https://doi.org/10.2196/12799
Mirarab, A. (2023). A survey of semantic search and retrieval approaches for Persian and Arabic texts. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 9(4), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.22091/stim.2024.10402.2067 [In Persian]
Nemeshaev, S., Barykin, L., & Dadteev, K. (2021). Selection of experts for scientific and technical expertise based on semantic search. Procedia Computer Science, 190, 643–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.06.075
Niknia, M. (2016). Linked data and user interaction: A path forward. Quarterly Review of Books, 3(10), 181–193. [In Persian]
Partarakis, N., & Zabulis, X. (2024). A review of immersive technologies, knowledge representation, and AI for human-centered digital experiences. Electronics, 13(2), Article 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13020269
Pasche, E., Gobeill, J., Vishnyakova, D., Ruch, P., & Lovis, C. (2013). Use of controlled vocabularies to improve biomedical information retrieval tasks. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 192, 1068. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23920842/
Saeedizadeh, M., & Taheri, A. (2016). Information interaction criteria among students in process of task-based information searching (Role of objective complexity and type of product). Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 31(4), 931–952. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2016.032 [In Persian]
Safari, N., Mirhosseini, Z., & Abazari, Z. (2025). Analyzing the information-seeking behavior of researchers in the field of art. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 12(42), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2025.84074.1694 [In Persian]
Shohrati, M. (2022). Information-seeking of physicians and nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic (Case study in Shahid Modarres and Masih Daneshvari hospitals in Tehran in 2020) [Master's thesis, Alzahra University]. [In Persian]
Shiri, A., & Revie, C. (2006). Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus‐enhanced search environment: A user‐centered evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(4), 462–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20319
Solomou, G., & Koutsomitropoulos, D. (2015). Towards an evaluation of semantic searching in digital repositories: A DSpace case-study. Program, 49(1), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-07-2013-0037
Taheri, M. (2015). Information and knowledge storage and retrieval with emphasis on modern approaches. Ketabdar: National Content Consortium. [In Persian]