نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

2 دکترای جامعه‌شناسی، بنیاد ملی نخبگان، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

پژوهش کیفی حاضر، ﺑﺮرﺳﻲ ﻋﻮاﻣﻞ ﻣﺆﺛﺮ در ﺧﻼﻗﻴﺖ و ﻧﻮآوری در کتابخانه‌های دانشگاهی از دﻳﺪﮔﺎه ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺪاران داﻧﺸﮕاه تبریز هست. جامعه آماری این پژوهش، شامل کلیه کتابداران شاغل در کتابخانه مرکزی و کتابخانه‌های وابسته به دانشگاه تبریز هستند که نمونه موردپژوهش، از بین این افراد، به روش هدفمند از نوع گلوله برفی به‌دست‌آمده و شامل 14 کتابدار است. ابزار گردآوری داده‌های این پژوهش، مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته است. جهت تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از شیوه کدگذاری گلاسر و استراوس استفاده شد‌ه‌است. بر اساس یافته‌ها، عوامل کلیدی مؤثر در ایجاد خلاقیت و نوآوری در کتابخانه‌های دانشگاهی از دیدگاه کتابداران دانشگاه تبریز به سه دسته عوامل فردی، عوامل سازمانی و ویژگی‌های ایده تقسیم می‌شود. عوامل فردی شامل مواردی از قبیل داشتن روحیه نوآوری و خلاقیت، داشتن انگیزه ارائه ایده خلاق، داشتن تحصیلات مرتبط با شغل توسط کارکنان و مدیران، داشتن روحیه ریسک‌پذیری است. عوامل سازمانی دربرگیرنده دو عامل پشتیبانی از ایده‌های کتابداران و تخصیص بودجه است. همچنین عامل ویژگی‌های ایده شامل عواملی چون مقرون‌به‌صرفه بودن، هماهنگی با اهداف کتابخانه، قابلیت دیده شدن توسط سایر افراد و سازمان‌ها، قابلیت اجرایی ایده در محیط کتابخانه است. از نتایج این پژوهش، چنین برمی‌آید که استقبال مدیران کتابخانه‌ها از ایده‌های کتابداران، باعث ایجاد انگیزه در کتابداران خلاق می‌گردد، لذا پیشنهاد می‌شود جهت پویایی هرچه بیشتر کتابخانه‌ها، مدیران کتابخانه از ایده‌های خلاقانه کارکنانشان استقبال نموده و سعی در اجرایی کردن آن‌ها نمایند. همچنین ازآنجاکه عملی کردن ایده‌ها نیازمند حمایت مالی سازمان مادر است، لذا لازم است مدیران کتابخانه جهت تخصیص بودجه کافی به کتابخانه‌ها در راستای اجرایی نمودن ایده‌ها با رایزنی با مدیران مافوق و توجیه نمودن آنان بتوانند بودجه کافی برای کتابخانه دریافت کنند تا بتوانند با عملی ساختن ایده‌های خلاقانه، بهره‌وری از کتابخانه را بالا ببرند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of Effective Factors in Creating Creativity and Innovation in University Libraries from the Perspective of Tabriz University Librarians

نویسندگان [English]

  • Faegheh Mohammadi 1
  • Rahim Pouri 2

1 Assisstant Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Ph.D. of Sociology, National Elite Foundation, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Organizations and social institutions should be innovative in order to avoid harmful changes in the environment. In educational institutions, such as universities, in which the head of the institution lacks funds, there are two columns related to the library, and the first is the head of the head of the head of the head of the head of the head. Karol's budget reduction due to lack of turnover. Increase the cost of personnel, increase the service level, and expand the planning ability.
 In the culture of an academic library, many librarians are expected to be entrepreneurial and innovative, but how can an academic librarian be an entrepreneur? And how does an academic library create a completely new service? There are few methods of managing and evaluating the success of innovation, and academic librarians are not well-versed in these methods.
 Despite the benefits mentioned above that the use of creativity and innovation can bring to libraries, factors such as the lack of resources and budgets in libraries have caused them not to try to provide the right environment for the cultivation of this creativity. Accordingly, librarians should not have the desire to exchange knowledge and experience and develop their innovative and creative abilities.
 What seems obvious in the meantime is that the mere presence of equipment and facilities in the library, as well as the mere presentation of ideas by people in theory, cannot guarantee the success of libraries in using creative ideas in practice, unless they use technology creatively. With more than 50 librarians as intellectual assets, the libraries of Tabriz University are among the important research centers in the country, which can play an important role in increasing productivity by valuing the creative ideas of their librarians and putting their ideas into practice.

Research Questions:
 The general goal of this research is to investigate the factors influencing creativity and innovation in university libraries from the point of view of the librarians of this university. Therefore, considering this goal, in this research, an attempt has been made to answer the basic questions such as the concept of creativity and innovation from the point of view of librarians, as well as encouraging and inhibiting factors in order to propose new ideas by librarians from their own point of view.

Literature Review
In 2019, Llewellyn conducted a review of the literature on academic library innovations for learning and teaching. In this research, he identified issues related to the roles of university librarians in innovation. Some of these roles include digital learning/e-learning skills; information literacy; participation and learning. Llewellyn concluded in this research that the innovations that affect society are more than the innovations that are only for learning and education.
Jantz (2013) has conducted a research related to innovation in university research libraries. Jantzen's analysis showed that average age, average work experience, level of education, field of study, and managers' view of librarians' creative ability cannot significantly predict innovation in university research libraries.
Vaughan (2013) examined technological innovation in academic libraries. The research results were collected through a questionnaire. The questions in the questionnaire evaluate issues such as managers' understanding of what constitutes innovation, technological developments that can be recognized as innovation, important considerations when deciding to implement an innovation, and how managers support innovation in the libraries under their management. Vaughan provided significant evidence of the importance of innovation in the academic library community, however, the methodology used by him in this study has little precision.

Methodology
 In this research, a qualitative method of phenomenological study has been used to investigate the issue more deeply. The required data have been collected using semi-structured interviews until reaching theoretical saturation.
 The statistical population included all the librarians working in the central library and the libraries affiliated to the University of Tabriz, and the sample of the research was obtained from among these people by a purposeful snowball method. At the end of each interview, each of the librarians introduced a few of their colleagues who were specialists in information science and were interested in making changes and innovations in libraries to the researchers. Finally, with 14 qualified librarians, the required data was reached and completed

Discussion
Based on the findings, the key factors effective in creativity and innovation in university libraries from the perspective of Tabriz University librarians are divided into three categories including: individual factors, organizational factors, and idea characteristics.
 Individual factors include things such as having the spirit of innovation and creativity, having the motivation to present creative ideas, having job-related education by employees and managers, and having the spirit of risk-taking.
Organizational factors include the support of librarians' ideas and budget allocation.
 The characteristics of the idea include factors such as cost-effectiveness, coordination with the goals of the library, visibility by other people and organizations, and the ability to implement the idea in the library environment. From the results of this research, it appears that library managers' acceptance of librarians' ideas motivates creative librarians, so it is suggested that library managers welcome the creative ideas of their employees and try to increase the dynamics of libraries and implement them. Also, since the implementation of the ideas requires the financial support of the parent organization, it is necessary for the library managers to allocate sufficient funds to the libraries in order to implement the ideas by consulting with the superior managers and justifying them to be able to receive sufficient funds for the library. So that they can increase the productivity of the library by implementing creative ideas.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Creativity in Libraries
  • Innovation in Libraries
  • Tabriz University Librarians
  • University Libraries
آقا کیشی زاده، وحید، عاصمی، عاصفه، شعبانی، احمد و عاصمی، عادله. (1398). خلاقیت سازمانی و مهارت‌های اطلاعاتی و ارتباطی کتابداران.  مطالعات کتابداری و سازمان‌دهی اطلاعات، 30(3)، 72-80.
آقایی فیشانی، تیمور. (1389). خلاقیت و نوآوری با نگرش سیستمی، تهران: کتاب طلائی جامع.
 بابائی، پریناز، افشار، ابراهیم و شاهین، آرش. (1394). در تکاپوی تغییر: تجربه‌های نوآوری مدیران کتابخانه‌های دانشگاه‌ها در شماری از دانشگاه‌های ایران. مجله مطالعات کتابداری در علم اطلاعات، 7(1)، 19-42.
بیراگل، مارک. (1395). مدیریت نوآوری در کتابخانه با استفاده از روش استارتاپ ناب. ترجمه سمیه مردمی، 2(4).
تفرشی، شکوه، سپهر، فرشته و کریمی، کبری. (1391). بررسی عوامل مؤثر در خلاقیت و نوآوری کتابداران دانشگاهی اصفهان از دیدگاه آنان. پژوهش‌نامه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، 2(1)، 91-110.
حسن‌زاده، محمد، زارعی، ابراهیم و هلالیان، فاطمه. (1394). رابطه تسهیم دانش با خلاقیت و نوآوری در بین کتابداران کتابخانه‌های مرکزی دانشگاه‌های تربیت مدرس، آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات و علوم پزشکی تهران. فصلنامه نظام‌ها و خدمات اطلاعاتی 4(3-4)، 23-36.
کلته، سمیه و اعرابی، طاهره. (1401). رابطه مهارت‌های مدیریت دانش کتابداران با نوآوری خدمات (مطالعه موردی: کتابخانه‌های عمومی استان سمنان. دانش‌شناسی، 15(58)، 91-101.
مردمی، سمیه. (1395). نقش مدیریت دانش در بهره‌وری علوم کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، تهران: انتشارات سخنوران.
نیر، نجمه، جوکار، عبدالرسول. (1391). رابطه بین مدیریت دانش و خلاقیت در میان کتابداران کتابخانه دانشگاهی شهر شیراز. نشریه مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت، 9(2)، 224-232.
 
Association of Research Libraries. (2014). Library expenditures as a percent of total university expenditures, 1982-2011 (40 Universities). Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/focus- areas/statistics-assessment/statisticaltrends#.VNe1SYE8KrV
Biranvand, A., Soheili, F. & Khasseh, A. A. (2015). Creativity of Librarians in Public Libraries: case study of public libraries of fars province (Iran). Library Philosophy and Practice(e-journal), 1308.
Brundy, C. (2015). Academic Libraries and Innovation: A Literature Review. Journal of Library Innovation, 6 (1), 22–39.
Callahan, D. R. (1991). The librarian as change agent in the diffusion of technological innovation. Electronic Library, 9(1), 13-15.
Cervone, H. F. (2007). The effect of professional advice networks on receptivity to innovation in academic librarians (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (304705076)
Clayton, P. (1997). Implementation of organizational innovation: Studies of academic and research libraries. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
Damanpour, F. & Childers, T. (1985). The adoption of innovation in public libraries. Library & Information Science Research, 7(3), 231-246.
Deiss, K. J. (2004). Innovation and strategy: Risk and choice in shaping user-centered libraries. Library Trends, 53(1), 17-32.
Drake, M. A. (1979). Managing innovation in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries, 40(6), 503-510.
Drake, M. A. & Olsen, H. A. (1979). The economics of library innovation. Library Trends, 28(1), 89-106.
Falciani-White, N. (2021). Creativity: A Toolkit for Academic Libraries. Chicago: Association of College & Research Libraries.
Fowler, R. K. (1998). The university library as learning organization for innovation: An exploratory study. College & Research Libraries, 59(3), 220-231.
Goulding, A. & Walton, J. G. (2014). Distributed leadership and library service innovation. Advances in Librarianship, 38, 37-81. DOI:10.1108/S0065-283020140000038002
 Heath, C. & Heath, D. (2007). Made to stick: Why some ideas survive and others die. Random House.‏
Holland, M. (1997). Diffusion of innovation theories and their relevance to understanding the role of librarians when introducing users to networked information. The Library, 15(5), 389-394.
Howard, H. A. (1981). Organizational structure and innovation in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries, 42(5), 425-434.
Jantz, R. C. (2012a). A framework for studying organizational innovation in research libraries. College & Research Libraries, 73(6), 525-541.
 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-302
Jantz, R. C. (2012). Innovation in academic libraries: An analysis of university librarians' perspectives. Library & Information Science Research, 34(1), 3-12.
 Jantz, R. C. (2013). Incremental and radical innovations in research libraries: An exploratory examination regarding the effects of ambidexterity, organizational structure, leadership and contextual factors (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (3597757).
Lajoie, E. W. & Bridges, L. (2014). Innovation decisions: Using the Gartner Hype Cycle. Library Leadership and Management, 28(4), 1-7.
Leong, J. & Anderson, C. (2012). Fostering innovation through cultural change. Library Management, 33(8/9), 490-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01435121211279858
Li, X. (2006). Library as incubating space for innovations: Practices, trends and skill sets. Library Management, 27(6/7), 370-378.
Liewellyn, A. (2019). Innovations in Learning and Teaching in Academic Libraries: A Literature Review. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 25 (2–4), 129–49.
Luquire, W. (1983). Attitudes toward automation/innovation in academic libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 8(6), 344-351.
Musmann, K. (1982). The diffusion of innovations in libraries: A review of the literature on organization theory and diffusion research. Libri, 32(1), 257-277.
        https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1982.32.1.257
Musmann, K. (1993). Technological innovations in libraries, 1860 – 1960: An anecdotal history. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Olaisen, J., Løvhøiden, H. & Djupvik, O. A. (1995). The innovative library: Innovation theory applied to library services. Libri, 45(2), 79-90.
Pellack, L. J. (2022). Academic Library Innovation: A Selective Review. Library Leadership & Management, 36(3), 1-19. https://llm-ojs-tamu.tdl.org/llm/article/view/7528.‏
Rabina, D. L. & Walczyk, D. J. (2007). Information professionals' attitude toward the adoption of innovations in everyday life. Information Research, 12(4), 1-15.
Reynolds, J. & Whitlatch, J. B. (1985), Academic library services: The literature of innovation. College & Research Libraries, 46(5), 402-417.
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovation (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
 Rowley, J. (2011a). Innovation for survival: From cooperation to collaboration. Advances in Librarianship, 34, 207-224.
Rowley, J. (2011b). Should your library have an innovation strategy?. Library Management, 32(4/5), 251-265.
 Taylor, R. S. (1973). Innovation in libraries: Effect on function and organization. In C. H. Rawski (Ed.), Toward a theory of librarianship: Papers in honour of Jesse Hauk Shera (pp. 451- 469). Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
University of Berkeley, Commission on the Future of the Library. (2013). Report of the Commission on the Future of the UC Berkeley Library. Retrieved from http://evcp.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/FINAL_‌CFUCBL‌_report_10.16.13.pdf
Vaughan, J. (2013). Technological innovation: Perceptions and definitions. Library Technology Reports, 49(7), 5-74.
Ward, D. M. (2013). Innovation in academic libraries during a time of crisis factors (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (1498561688)
Weiner, S. G. (2003). Resistance to change in libraries: Application of communication theories. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(1), 69-78.
White, M. D. (2001). Diffusion of an innovation: Digital reference service in Carnegie Foundation master’s (comprehensive) academic institution libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27(3), 173-187.
Zhang, Y., Khan, U., Lee, S. & Salik, M. (2019). The influence of management innovation and technological innovation on organization performance. A mediating role of sustainability. Sustainability, 11(2), 495.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020495
References [In Persian]
Agha Kishizadeh, V., Asemi, A., Shabani, A. & Asemi, A. (2018). Organizational creativity and information and communication skills of librarians. Library and Information Organization Studies, 30(3), 72-80. [In Persian]
Aghaei Fishani, T. (1389). Creativity and innovation with a systemic approach. Tehran: Golden Kitab Jame. [In Persian]
Babaei, P., Afshar, I. & Shahin, A. (2014). In pursuit of change: innovation experiences of university library managers in some Iranian universities. Journal of Library Studies in Information Science. 7(1), 19-42. [In Persian]
Biragel, M. (2015). Innovation management in the library using lean startup method. Translated by Somayeh Mardomi. 2(4). [In Persian]
Hassanzadeh, M., Zarei, I. & Helalian, F. (2014). The relationship between knowledge sharing and creativity and innovation among the librarians of the central libraries of Tarbiat Modares University, Islamic Azad University of Science and Research and Medical Sciences of Tehran. Journal of Information Systems and Services, 4 (3 - 4), 23-36. [In Persian]
Kolte, S. & Arabi, T. (1401). The relationship between librarians' knowledge management skills and service innovation (case study: public libraries of Semnan province). Journal of Knowledge Studies, 15(58), 91-101. [In Persian]
Mardomi, S. (2015). The role of knowledge management in the productivity of library and information sciences. Tehran: Sokhanvaran Publications. [In Persian]
Nir, N. & Jokar, A. R. (2011). The relationship between knowledge management and creativity among the librarians of Shiraz University Library. Journal of Health Information Management, 9 (2), 224-232. [In Persian]
Tafreshi, Sh., Sepehr, F. & Karimi, K. (2017) Investigation of effective factors in creativity and innovation of Isfahan university librarians from their point of view. Library and information research, 2(1), 91-110. [In Persian]