نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری مدیریت آموزش عالی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه ملایر، ملایر، ایران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسایی چالش‌های جهت‌دهی پژوهش‌های دانشگاهی به سمت نقش‌آفرینی در حل مسائل و نیازهای کشور بود. برای دستیابی به این هدف، از روش تحلیل محتوا استفاده شد. جامعه هدف در پژوهش حاضر شامل 16 خبره دانشگاهی و پژوهشگاهی بودند که با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته بود. برای تحلیل داده‌ها نیز از روش تحلیل محتوای استقرایی استفاده شد. برای بررسی اعتبار یافته‌های حاصل از پژوهش از دو روش بازبینی توسط مشارکت‌کننده و بازبینی توسط همکار استفاده شد. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها نشان داد که چالش‌های جهت‌دهی پژوهش‌های دانشگاهی به سمت نقش‌آفرینی در حل مسائل و نیازهای کشور را می‌توان در چهار مقوله اصلی و هشت مقوله فرعی شامل چالش‌های نهادی (خلأ آیین‌نامه ارتقاء در عدم اختصاص امتیاز ویژه به انجام پژوهش‌های کاربردی و مسئله محور، نبود نظام نظارت و اعتبارسنجی مناسب)، چالش‌های سازمانی (توزیع نامناسب نسبت اعضای هیئت‌علمی به دانشجو، عدم اختصاص بودجه عملیاتی و مسئله محور در دانشگاه‌ها، عدم توجه به مقوله مأموریت گرایی در جذب اساتید و دانشجویان)، چالش‌های محیطی (کامل نبودن چرخه علم، فناوری و نوآوری، تقاضای کم از سوی نهادها و سازمان‌های برای انجام پژوهش‌های کاربردی) و چالش‌های فردی (عدم توانایی و تمایل اندک اساتید در حل مسائل و مشکلات جامعه) طبقه‌بندی کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Reflection on the Challenges of the Purposefulness of Academic Research towards Role-Playing in Solving the Problems and Issues in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ehsan Parvin 1
  • Mohsen Nazarzadeh Zare 2

1 Ph.D. of Higher Education Managment, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran

چکیده [English]

1.Introduction

Universities play a pivotal role in advancing knowledge and fostering societal progress. However, their ability to align research with real-world challenges remains a critical global concern. In Iran, this issue is particularly pressing. Despite significant achievements in quantitative scientific output, ranking 15th and 16th globally in Scopus and Web of Science in 2022, Iranian research often fails to address pressing national problems. This paradox highlights systemic inefficiencies, including institutional misalignment, fragmented innovation ecosystems, and policies prioritizing publication metrics over societal impact. National frameworks, such as Iran's Fifth Development Plan (2010), emphasize the need to direct research toward addressing societal needs, yet implementation gaps persist. This study examines the institutional, organizational, environmental, and individual barriers that prevent Iranian universities from translating academic research into practical solutions, aiming to propose reforms that bridge the gap between scholarly output and societal relevance. Based on this framework, the present study, considering the aforementioned challenges and issues in academic research and its qualitative development about society and its needs, seeks to answer the following key question:

2.Literature Review

The disconnect between academic research and societal needs has been widely debated in global scholarship. Universities worldwide are increasingly encouraged to adopt a "third mission" focused on social responsibility, integrating community engagement and problem-solving into their core activities. Scholars such as Jones et al. (2021) argue that universities must evolve from isolated knowledge producers to active contributors to societal development, emphasizing collaborative frameworks that connect academia with industry and policymakers. In emerging economies, this challenge is exacerbated by structural barriers, including rigid funding models, bureaucratic inertia, and a lack of institutional incentives for applied research. In Iran, studies critique the predominance of "scientific formalism," where procedural rigor and publication metrics overshadow practical relevance. Researchers like Shafiei et al. (2020) highlight the disconnect between academic output and industry demands, attributing it to weak collaboration mechanisms and a cultural preference for theoretical over applied studies. Similarly, Ghoreishi et al. (2021) identify systemic flaws in promotion policies that reward quantity (e.g., article counts) over quality or societal impact, discouraging faculty from undertaking time-intensive, problem-driven projects. Farastkhah (2016) further critiques the erosion of universities’ core mission—science for societal advancement—due to bureaucratic pressures and misaligned institutional priorities. Globally, similar trends exist. For instance, Shaffer et al. (2018) note that academic systems prioritizing high-impact journals often neglect local problem-solving, while Makhatini et al. (2022) highlight demand-supply mismatches in innovation ecosystems. Existing literature, however, tends to focus on isolated challenges (e.g., funding or industry collaboration) rather than systemic analyses. This study addresses this gap by taking a holistic approach to examining multidimensional barriers that hinder impactful research in Iran.

3.Methodology

In the study, a qualitative research design by content analysis was used to investigate the challenges of academic research in solving Iran's issues. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 Iranian expert academics who are senior faculty members, research directors, and policymakers. The participants were selected according to purposive sampling because of their experience in applied research. Data collection stopped when theoretical saturation had been achieved, with interviews taped and analyzed through Granheim and Lundman's (2004) inductive content analysis approach. This included the identification of meaningful units, coding for emerging themes, and categorizing results under institutional, organizational, environmental, and individual problems. Rigor was ensured through triangulation, member-checking, and peer-checking, with ethical considerations being the anonymizing of participant data and seeking informed consent.

4.Results

The analysis of study data identified four interconnected forms of challenges:

Institutional barriers include promotion systems that prioritize publication volume over societal impact and the absence of national accreditation frameworks to ensure research quality and relevance.
Organizational challenges involve structural inefficiencies, such as faculty-student imbalances, non-performance-based funding models, and recruitment practices misaligned with national priorities.
Environmental barriers highlight fragmented innovation ecosystems characterized by weak linkages between academia, industry, and policymakers, as well as low demand from the private sector for collaborative research.
Individual challenges primarily consist of motivational gaps among faculty, driven by institutional incentives favoring easily publishable topics over complex, problem-driven projects.

These factors collectively divert academic efforts from addressing societal needs, perpetuating a cycle of non-impactful research.

5.Discussion

The findings underscore the systemic misalignment between Iran’s academic ecosystem and societal needs. Institutional policies, such as promotion criteria favoring publication volume, mirror global "publish or perish" cultures but lack compensatory mechanisms for applied work. Organizational challenges, including overcrowded supervision roles and rigid funding structures, reflect broader governance issues observed in other contexts, such as India and Brazil. Environmental barriers, particularly weak industry-academia linkages, highlight the need for ecosystem-level reforms to foster demand-driven research. At the individual level, faculty motivations shaped by institutional incentives perpetuate the cycle of non-impactful output. Addressing these issues requires integrated reforms, including policy revisions to reward societal impact, funding models tied to performance, and capacity-building initiatives to enhance problem-solving skills.

6.Conclusion

This study highlights the urgency of realigning Iran’s academic research ecosystem with national priorities. Key recommendations include revising promotion policies to incentivize applied research, establishing national accreditation systems, and fostering industry partnerships through targeted grants. By addressing institutional, organizational, environmental, and individual barriers, universities can transition from passive knowledge hubs to dynamic contributors to societal development. Future research should explore the socioeconomic impacts of these reforms and benchmark progress against international models, such as South Korea’s integrated innovation ecosystems.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Academic Research
  • Higher Education
  • Iran's Issues
  • Purposefulness of Research
‌الحسن، احمد یوسف. (1391). عوامل افول علم اسلامی پس از سده دهم هجری (ترجمه محمد جوا ناطق). میراث علمی اسلام و ایران. (اثر اصلی منتشر شده در سال 1996)
پایگاه جهان اسلام. (دی، 1401). جایگاه علمی ایران در SCOPUS. https://isc.ac/fa/grid/185/%D8%AC%D8%A7%DB%8C%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85%DB%8C-%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AF%D8%B1-scopus?page=1&per-page=10
پایگاه جهان اسلام. (دی، 1401). جایگاه علمی ایران در WOS. https://isc.ac/fa/grid/184/%D8%AC%D8%A7%DB%8C%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85%DB%8C-%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AF%D8%B1-wos
حکاک، محمد، حزنی، سیدعلی، مروتی، حمید و اخلاقی، طاهره. (1397). عارضه‌یابی پژوهشی در دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گیلان. پژوهش در آموزش علوم پزشکی، 10(2)، 46-57.‎
شفیعی، مجتبی، مجیدی، میثم، غارثی‌فرد، محمد، توکلی امینیان، سمانه و قنبری، فریبا. (1399). مروری کوتاه بر وضعیت «پژوهش» و «نوآوری» در ایران، با تأکید بر بخش آب: ضرورت تغییر رویکردها. علوم و مهندسی آب و فاضلاب، 5(2)،4-13.‎
شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی. (1389). نقشه جامع علمی کشور. https://sccr.ir/Pub/1/1830
عزیزی، فریدون. (1389). شاخص‌های ارتقای علمی کشور. نشریه مجله غدد درون‌ریز و متابولیسم ایران، 12 (3)، 20۵-20۷.
فراستخواه، مقصود. (1395). گاه‌وبیگاهی دانشگاه در ایران. تهران: آگاه.
قارون، معصومه. (1381). منابع مالی تحقیقات در ایران و سایر کشورها: مفاهیم و چشم‌اندازها. مجله رهیافت، 27 (1)، 197-212.
قریشی خوراسگانی، مریم‌سادات، جنوی، المیرا و نظرزاده زارع، محسن. (1400). تبیین پدیده فرم‌‌گرایی علمی در نظام دانشگاهی ایران: عوامل و راهکارها. سیاست علم و فناوری، 14(2)، 51-66.
قاسمی، افسانه و جاراللهی، عذرا. (۱۳۹۳). عوامل مؤثر بر روحیه علمی دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد. برنامه‌ریزی رفاه و توسعه اجتماعی، ۵ (۱۹)، ۱-۳۹.
گرگین‌کرجی، ‌آرش و بابازاده، ‌مسیب. (1399). چالش‌های داوری مقالات پژوهشی در حوزه فنی و مهندسی در ایران. نخبگان علوم و مهندسی، 24(5)، 213-233.‎
محمدپورمیر، محمدمهدی، شجاعی، سامره، سمیعی، روح ا... اشرفی، مجید. (1398). بررسی عوامل زمینه‌ای مؤثر بر تجاری‌سازی دستاوردهای پژوهشی فناورانه مطالعه موردی دانشگاه فنی‌و‌حرفه‌ای. فصلنامه علمی کارافن، 16(2)، 33-50.‎
مختاریان، فرانک و محمدی، رضا. (1392). کارگاه‌های مجازی ارزشیابی کیفیت: ضرورت‌ها و راهکارها. مجموعه مقالات دومین کنفرانس ملی ارزشیابی و تضمین کیفیت در نظام‌های آموزش عالی. تهران: سازمان سنجش آموزش کشور، 91-118.
معین‌الدینی، محمود. (1398). نیازسنجی آموزشی مسائل راهبردی اجتماعی. مطالعات دفاعی استراتژیک، 17(77)، 203-224.‎
نیسی‌نیا، علی. (1396). آسیب‌شناسی سیاست‌گذاری در برنامه درسی بر اساس مدل SWOT. تهران: آوای نور.
وحدتی، منصوره، مظلومی محمودآباد، سید‌سعید، سلیمی، طاهره و اقبال، عبدالعظیم. (1393). بررسی موانع انجام پژوهش‌های آموزشی در دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید صدوقی یزد در سال ۱۳۹۲. مجله مرکز مطالعات و توسعه آموزش علوم پزشکی شهید صدوقی یزد، ۹ (۲)، 23-40.
ورسه، فاطمه، ریماز، شهناز و مرادی، یوسف. (1399). چالش‌ها در مرحله طراحی، اجرا، تحلیل و انتشار یافته‌های کارآزمایی‌های‌ بالینی تصادفی‌شده در ایران: مطالعه کیفی. مجله تخصصی اپیدمیولوژی ایران، 16(3)، 237-246.‎
References
Azizi, F. (2010). Indicators for promoting the country's scientific status. Iranian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 12(3), 205–207. [In Persian]
Çoltekin, A., Lochhead, I., Madden, M., Christophe, S., Devaux, A., Pettit, C., & Hedley, N. (2020). Extended reality in spatial sciences: A review of research challenges and future directions. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(7), 439.
Farastkhah, M. (2016). The occasional university in Iran. Tehran: Agah. [In Persian]
Gergin-Karji, A., & Babazadeh, M. (2020). Challenges of peer review of research articles in the field of engineering in Iran. Elites of Science and Engineering, 24(5), 213–233. [In Persian]
Gharoon, M. (2002). Financial resources for research in Iran and other countries: Concepts and perspectives. Rahyaft Journal, 27(1), 197–212. [In Persian]
Ghasemi, A., & Jarollahi, A. (2014). Factors Affecting Scientific Spirit of University Students. Social Development & Welfare Planning5(19), 1-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22054/qjsd.2015.683
Ghoreshi Khorasgani, M.S., Janavi, E., & Nazarzadeh Zare, M. (2021). Explaining the phenomenon of scientific formalism in Iran's university system: Factors and solutions. Science and Technology Policy, 14(2), 51–66. [In Persian]
Graneheim, U.H. & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse education today, 24(2), 105-112.
Hakkak, M., Hazni, S.A., Morvati, H., & Akhlaghi, T. (2018). Research problem identification among graduate students of Guilan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Research in Medical Education, 10(2), 46–57. [In Persian]
Islamic World Science Citation Center. (December, 2022). Iran's scientific ranking in SCOPUS. https://isc.ac/fa/grid/185/%D8%AC%D8%A7%DB%8C%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85%DB%8C-%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AF%D8%B1-scopus?page=1&per-page=10 [In Persian]
Islamic World Science Citation Center. (December, 2022). Iran's scientific ranking in WOS. https://isc.ac/fa/grid/184/%D8%AC%D8%A7%DB%8C%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85%DB%8C-%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AF%D8%B1-wos [In Persian]
Jones, E., Leask, B., Brandenburg, U., & de Wit, H. (2021). Global social responsibility and the internationalisation of higher education for society. Journal of Studies in International Education, 25(4), 330-347.
Lionis, C., Stoffers, H.E.J.H., Hummers-Pradier, E., Griffiths, F., Rotar-Pavlič, D., & Rethans, J.J. (2004). Setting priorities and identifying barriers for general practice research in Europe. Results from an EGPRW* meeting. Family Practice, 21(5), 587-593.
Mertens, D.M. (2015). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods (Fourth Edition). Los Angles: SAGE.
Mohammadpourmir, M.M., Shojaei, S., Samiei, R., & Ashrafi, M. (2019). Examining contextual factors affecting the commercialization of technological research outcomes: A case study of Technical and Vocational University. Karafan Scientific Quarterly, 16(2), 33–50. [In Persian]
Mohiqi, M., Mohiqi, M.K., & Ghali Flayyih Al-Kenani, M. (2019). Evaluation of academic research in Islamic countries (pathology and legal solutions). The Fundamental and Applied Studies of the Islamic World, 1(1), 101-117.
Moin-al-Dini, M. (2019). Educational needs assessment for strategic social issues. Strategic Defense Studies, 17(77), 203–224. [In Persian]
Mokhtarian, F., & Mohammadi, R. (2013). Virtual quality evaluation workshops: Needs and solutions. In Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Evaluation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education Systems (pp. 91–118). Tehran: National Organization for Educational Testing. [In Persian]
Mukhuty, S., Upadhyay, A., & Rothwell, H. (2022). Strategic sustainable development of Industry 4.0 through the lens of social responsibility: The role of human resource practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22 (32), 2068–2081.
Neisinia, A. (2017). Pathology of curriculum policy-making based on the SWOT model. Tehran: Avaye Noor. [In Persian]
Purcell, W.M., Henriksen, H., & Spengler, J.D. (2019). Universities as the engine of transformational sustainability toward delivering the sustainable development goals:“Living labs” for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(8), 1343-1357.
Schaeffer, P.R., Fischer, B., & Queiroz, S. (2018). Beyond education: The role of research universities in innovation ecosystems. Foresight and STI Governance, 12(2), 50-61.
Shafiei, M., Majidi, M., Gharesifard, M., Tavakoli Aminian, S., & Ghanbari, F. (2020). A brief review of the status of "research" and "innovation" in Iran, with emphasis on the water sector: The need for changing approaches. Water and Wastewater Science and Engineering, 5(2), 4–13. [In Persian]
Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution. (2010). Comprehensive scientific map of the country. https://sccr.ir/Pub/1/1830 [In Persian]
Vahdati, M., Mazlumi Mahmoudabad, S.S., Salimi, T., & Eghbal, A. (2014). Investigating barriers to conducting educational research at Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences in Yazd in 2013. Journal of the Center for Studies and Development of Medical Education Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences Yazd, 9(2), 23–40. [In Persian]
Varseh, F., Rimaz, S., & Moradi, Y. (2020). Challenges in the design, implementation, analysis, and publication of findings of randomized clinical trials in Iran: A qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Epidemiology, 16(3), 237–246. [In Persian]
Watty, K., Bellamy, S., & Morley, C. (2008). Changes in higher education and valuing the job: The views of accounting academics in Australia. Journal of higher education policy and management, 30(2), 139-151.
Yusef-al-Hassan, A. (2012). Factors contributing to the decline of Islamic science after the tenth century AH (M. J. Nategh, Trans.). Scientific Heritage of Islam and Iran. (Original work published 1996) [In Persian]