نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام‌نور، تهران، ایران

2 کارشناسیارشد مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام‌نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر کاوش انگیزه برای مشارکت در به اشتراک‌گذاری دانش درون‌سازمانی بود که بر اساس پارادایم تفسیری و با رویکرد کاربردی توسعه‌ای به‌صورت کیفی انجام شد و برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از مصاحبه‌های نیمه ساختاریافته استفاده شد. جامعه آماری این پژوهش، اعضای هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه پیام‌نور بودند که 16 نفر به‌صورت هدفمند بر اساس معیارهایی انتخاب شدند. روایی و پایایی داده‌های به‌دست‌آمده از مصاحبه‌ها با استفاده از معیارهای مقبولیت و قابلیت تائید و باز آزمون بررسی شد. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از روش داده‌بنیاد و فرایند کدگذاری در سه مرحله کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی انجام شد. کدگذاری‌ها در هر سه مرحله تشریح و مدل انگیزه به اشتراک‌گذاری دانش درون‌سازمانی برای اعضای هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه پیام‌نور بر اساس روش داده‌بنیاد ترسیم شد. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که چهار مقوله هم‌راستایی راهبردی اشتراک دانش، عوامل مدیریتی، عوامل فردی و ایجاد محتوا عوامل تأثیرگذار در انگیزة اشتراک‌گذاری دانش بوده؛ همچنین، محیط اشتراک، جنبه‌های آموزشی، ارزیابی، مسائل فنی، زیرساخت و مسائل اطلاعاتی، عوامل اصلی زمینه‌ای هستند و دو مقوله عوامل شخصیتی اعضا و بی‌ثباتی فرهنگ سازمانی به‌عنوان مقوله‌های مداخله‌گر شناسایی شدند و راهبردهای این پژوهش شامل چهار عامل تحول، رشدگرایی، بافت سازمانی و راهبردهای سازمانی است و بخش آخر مدل پژوهش، شامل پویایی سازمانی، پیامدهای اجتماعی، توسعه عوامل ساختاری و ایجاد سازمان یادگیرنده به‌عنوان پیامدهای ارتقای انگیزة اشتراک‌گذاری دانش در میان اعضای هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه پیام‌نور شناسایی شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Exploring the Motivation to Participate in Intra-Organizational Knowledge Sharing

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zohre Sharei 1
  • Marzeyeh Dehghanizadeh 1
  • Mohammad Hasanzadeh Odorji 2

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Economics and Accounting, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Master of Public Administration, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

1.Introduction
Knowledge management, as a critical organizational asset, plays a vital role in success and competitiveness (Abbas et al., 2021). Organizational success increasingly depends on employees’ behaviors, particularly knowledge sharing (Chopra & Gupta, 2019). Sustaining organizational knowledge is essential for digital transformation and sustainable development (Di Vaio et al., 2021; Steiner, 2018). Consequently, knowledge management has become a strategic priority, offering tools to balance business objectives and competitive advantages (Al-Kurdi et al., 2018). The primary challenge is developing knowledge management strategies, such as intra-organizational knowledge sharing, that address the dynamics of the organizational knowledge base (Nadason et al., 2017). To achieve this, organizations must foster a culture that encourages knowledge-sharing behaviors (Halisah et al., 2021; Fattahian et al., 2022). Knowledge is recognized as a factor of production alongside land, labor, and capital (Sasmita, 2023). Each individual possesses unique knowledge shared through learning and experience (Goswami, 2023). Knowledge sharing is a powerful tool for human development and social progress (Yasir, 2023) and is defined as the exchange of experiences and insights to gain a deeper understanding (Mapionaya, 2005). This process benefits both the sharer and the recipient (Adamseged, 2018). Knowledge management has evolved into a scientific discipline, considered a natural activity in academic institutions, particularly universities (Javaid, 2020; Hasirchi et al., 1399). Knowledge sharing is essential for institutional growth and societal development, enhancing organizations’ ability to respond to business opportunities (Hussain & Nasiura, 2011). In higher education, faculty members play a pivotal role in transferring knowledge to students and society (Adamseged, 2018). Given the constant evolution of knowledge due to technology and innovation, sharing knowledge among faculty is critical for its preservation and dissemination (Javaid, 2020).
Motivating knowledge sharing is a global priority in knowledge management (Salehi & Alanbari, 2023). Organizational culture and work motivation are key to encouraging this behavior (Iman et al., 2023; Bawik et al., 2018).
 
Research Question(s)
This study aims to explore the motivations for intra-organizational knowledge sharing among faculty members of Payame Noor University, focusing on two questions:
What is the process of creating motivation for faculty participation in knowledge sharing?
What are the influencing and influenced conditions (causal, contextual, intervening, strategies, and outcomes) of knowledge-sharing motivation?

2.Literature Review

Attitudes toward knowledge sharing reflect individuals’ positive or negative feelings, which can be instrumental (useful or harmful) or affective (enjoyable or unpleasant) (Wu et al., 2023). Sharing knowledge may reduce individual power within an organization, posing a barrier to participation. Prior studies fall into two categories:
Research addressing knowledge-sharing motivation.
Studies exploring the role of knowledge sharing in universities and among faculty.
Domestic studies, such as Goldasteh et al. (2022), found a significant relationship between organizational climate, attitudes, and knowledge sharing. Fattahian et al. (2022) confirmed a positive relationship between influencing factors and attitudes toward knowledge sharing. Hasirchi et al. (2020) identified components for extracting expert knowledge. International studies, such as Nguyen et al. (2022) and Yu & Meng (2021), emphasize the role of intrinsic motivation in enhancing knowledge sharing. However, no qualitative study has directly explored knowledge-sharing motivation in universities.

3.Methodology

This qualitative study adopted an interpretive approach with a developmental-applied goal, conducted cross-sectionally with an exploratory strategy. Data were collected through library studies and semi-structured interviews. The population consisted of Payam-e Noor University faculty in human resource management and organizational behavior, with associate or assistant professor ranks and over 5 years of experience, from 8 provinces. Purposive sampling continued until theoretical saturation (16 participants). Validity and reliability were ensured using acceptability (participant review) and confirmability (retest with over 80% similarity).
Data analysis followed the grounded theory approach with open, axial, and selective coding (Corbin & Strauss, 2008). Data were categorized and developed into a theoretical model.

4.Results

Demographic Characteristics: 87.5% male, 12.5% female; 62.5% assistant professors, 37.5% associate professors.
Open Coding: 120 conceptual codes were extracted. For example, organizational injustice leads to knowledge hoarding, while recognition and rewards enhance motivation.
Axial Coding: Main categories included:

Causal Conditions: Strategic alignment, managerial factors, individual factors, content creation.
Contextual Conditions: Sharing environment, educational aspects, evaluation, technical issues, infrastructure, information issues.
Intervening Conditions: Faculty personality factors, organizational culture instability.
Strategies: Transformation, growth orientation, organizational context, organizational strategies.
Outcomes: Organizational dynamism, social outcomes, structural development, learning organization.

Paradigm Model: Designed based on Corbin and Strauss (2008).
 
5.Discussion

The findings indicate that strategic alignment, managerial factors, individual factors, and content creation influence knowledge-sharing motivation, aligning with Nguyen et al. (2019) and Gaiodenko (2021). Social networks facilitate knowledge sharing. Contextual conditions, such as the sharing environment, educational aspects, and technical infrastructure, are essential for accelerating knowledge sharing (Alrehbi, 2022; Ade, 2021). Managers should promote activities like knowledge flow, participatory decision-making, and smart systems, though Payam-e Noor University’s geographic dispersion makes this process time-consuming and costly. Intervening conditions, such as faculty personality (e.g., extroversion or introversion) and organizational culture instability, are key barriers. Workplace health, faculty involvement, and bureaucracy impact motivation. Strategies like transformation, growth orientation, and strengthening organizational context (e.g., social education, decision-making involvement, infrastructure) enhance knowledge sharing. Outcomes include organizational dynamism, improved social interactions, structural development, and a learning organization, which elevate the university’s status and student recruitment.

6.Conclusion

Payam-e Noor University can enhance knowledge-sharing motivation through managerial support, rewards, teamwork, and human resource empowerment. Addressing challenges like personality factors and cultural instability removes barriers. Technology use and precise planning are essential to overcome geographic dispersion. Outcomes such as enhanced sharing culture, reduced social tensions, and a learning organization can improve the university’s quality. Recommendations include leveraging technology, providing technical and administrative support, planning for knowledge retention amid retirements, fostering interpersonal relationships, and replicating the study with other disciplines and universities. Knowledge sharing is a prerequisite for successful organizational systems, and by removing barriers and boosting motivation, effective knowledge management and organizational development can be achieved.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Grounded Theory
  • Internal Knowledge
  • Knowledge Sharing
  • Motivation
  • Participation
  • Intra-Organizational
بابایی فارسانی، میثم و حسنی مقدم، صادق. (1399). ارائه الگوی اندیشه ورزی با محوریت دیدگاه‌های مقام معظم رهبری: رویکرد آمیخته (نمونه پژوهش: دانشگاه جامع امام حسین علیه‌السلام). فصلنامه مدیریت دانش سازمانی، 3(1)، 65-101. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26454262.1399.3.1.2.2
بیرانوند، علی و صیفی، محمدحسن. (1397). بررسی تأثیر عوامل مؤثر بر قصد تسهیم دانش. رهیافت، 28(72)، 47-60. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.10272690.1397.28.72.4.3
بازرگان، عباس. (1387). مقدمهای بر روش تحقیق کیفی و ترکیبی: رویکردهای رایج در علوم رفتاری. تهران: دیدار.
حصیرچی، امیر، تولایی، روح‌الله و متینی مطهر، مسعود. (1399). طراحی الگوی بومی استخراج دانش خبرگان و تجربیات سازمانی در سطح راهبردی. فصلنامه مدیریت دانش سازمانی، 3(4)، 101-136. https://jkm.ihu.ac.ir/article_206017.html?lang=en
سیف، محمدحسن، ثابت مهارلویی، عباس، رستگار، احمد و طالبی، سعید. (1394). عوامل مؤثر بر تمایل به اشتراک دانش در بین اعضای هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شیراز. آموزش در علوم پزشکی، 15، 41-50. http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-3505-en.html
سلیمی، قاسم، صباغیان، زهرا، دانایی‌فرد، حسن و ابوالقاسمی، محمود. (1393). مفهوم‌سازی فرایند تسهیم دانش بین اعضای هیئت‌علمی در محیط‌های دانشگاهی: نظریه‌ای داده بنیاد. مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی در نظامهای آموزشی، 7(1)، 9-38. https://scj.sbu.ac.ir/article_98394_3e2bc2fa1f5a67f61d345c9f73194ddd.pdf
شرعی، زهره، ابراهیمی، سید‌عباس، دامغانیان، حسین و زارعی، عظیم. (1398). ارائه الگوی برندسازی ملی در حوزه نخبگان و استعدادهای برتر با رویکرد تئوری داده‌بنیاد. پژوهشهای مدیریت عمومی، 12(46)، 171-198. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2019.30447.4631
گلدسته، اکبر، همایون آریا، شاهین و مقصودی، بهاره. (1401). مدل بندی ساختاری عوامل مؤثر بر تسهیم دانش بین اعضای هیئت‌علمی. فصلنامه مدیریت دانش سازمانی، 5(3)، 37-67. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26454262.1401.5.3.2.0
فتاحیان، سمیه، مکی‌زاده، فاطمه و حاضری، افسانه. (1401). نگرش مبتنی بر تسهیم دانش و واکاوی عوامل مرتبط با آن در بین اعضای هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه یزد در سال 1399. فصلنامه بازیابی دانش و نظام‌های معنایی، 9(30)، 119-137. https://jks.atu.ac.ir/article_13483.html?lang=en
فتح‌آبادی، حسین، خالقی، آرمین، دهقان نجم‌آبادی، عامر و سلاجقه، نیلوفر. (1401). بررسی تأثیر مدیریت دانش و گرایش کارآفرینانه بر انتقال فناوری میان صنعت و دانشگاه (نمونه پژوهش: شرکت زامیاد و دانشگاه تهران). فصلنامه مدیریت دانش سازمانی، 5(3)، 11-36. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26454262.1401.5.3.1.9
عارف‌نژاد، محسن و موسوی، سیده مریم. (1401). تهیه نقشه شناختی فازی عوامل مؤثر بر احتکار دانش در سازمان (نمونه پژوهش: دانشگاه لرستان). فصلنامه مدیریت دانش سازمانی، 5(4)،47-74. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26454262.1401.5.4.2.2
عسگری، ناصر، خلعتبری معظم، مریم و هاشمیان‌زاده، شمیم. (1399). فراتحلیل پیشایندهای تسهیم دانش در سازمان‌های ایرانی. مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی، 3(3)، 113-145. 10.47176/smok.2020.1202/ https://doi.org
علیزاده، ندا، راد، غلامرضا و صدیقی، حسن. (1389). بررسی نگرش اعضای هیئت‌علمی پیرامون تسهیم دانش در مؤسسات آموزش عالی: مطالعه موردی دانشکده‌های کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، فصلنامه آموزش عالی، 3(2)، 125-138. file:///C:/Users/NiC/Downloads/47913891006-3.pdf
طاهری عطار، غزاله، متوسلی، محمدحسن، خضری، سیده اله و نامدار جویمی، احسان. (1397). رابطه انگیزه مدیریت اطلاعات شخصی و هدف تسهیم دانش: با توجه به نقش تعهد سیستم مدیریت دانش (اعضای هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه تهران). دانششناسی، 11(43)، 60-74. https://qje.ntb.iau.ir/article_676276.html?lang=en
نوری کوهانی، مرضیه و نادی، محمدعلی. (1398). رابطه ساختاری بین انگیزش درونی و بیرونی، نگرش به تسهیم دانش، کنترل رفتاری ادراک‌شده، هنجارهای ذهنی و نیت تسهیم دانش با رفتار تسهیم دانش. مطالعات آموزشی و آموزشگاهی، 8(1)، 127-154. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2423494.1398.8.1.6.7
 References
Abbas, J., & Kumari, K. (2021). Examining the relationship between total quality management and knowledge management and their impact on organizational performance: a dimensional analysis. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 39(2), 426-451. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-03-2021-0046
Adamseged, H.Y., & Hong, J.J. (2018). Knowledge sharing among university faculty members. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(24), 1-10. file:///C:/Users/NiC/Downloads/44026-47370-1-PB.pdf
Alexandru, V.A., Bolisani, E., Andrei, A.G., Cegarra-Navarro, J.G., Martınez Martınez, A., Paiola, M., Scarso, E., Vatamanescu, E.-M., & Zieba, M. (2019). Knowledge management approaches of small and medium-sized firms: a cluster analysis, Kybernetes, 49(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1108 / K-03-2019-0211
Alizadeh, N., PezeshkiRad, Gh., & Siddiqi, H. (2010) Examining the attitude of faculty members regarding knowledge sharing in higher education institutions: a case study of Tehran University Colleges of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Higher Education Quarterly, 3(2), 125-138. file:///C:/Users/NiC/Downloads/47913891006-3.pdf [In Persian]
Al-Kurdi, O., El-Haddadeh, R., & Eldabi, T. (2018). Knowledge sharing in higher education institutions: a systematic review. Journal of enterprise information management, 31(2), 226-246. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2017-0129
Alrahbi, D.A., Khan, M., Gupta, S., Modgil, S., & Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J. (2022). Health-care information technologies for dispersed knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(6), 1589-1614. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2020-0786
Arefnezhad, M., & Mousavi, M. (2022). Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping Factors Affecting Knowledge Hooser in the Organization (Case Study: Lorestan University). Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 5(4), 47-74. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26454262.1401.5.4.2.2 [In Persian]
Armoun, A., Sattari, S., & Namvar, Y. (2019). Effective Factors on Knowledge Sharing among Faculty Members: Ardabil University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 19,189-198. URL: http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-4788-fa.html
Arsawan, I., Wirga, I.W., & Suryantini, N.P.S. (2020). Harnessing knowledge sharing practice to enhance innovative work behavior: the paradox of social exchange theory. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 60-73. https://repository.pnb.ac.id/id/eprint/4660/1/Harnessing_knowledge_sharing_practi.pdf
Asgari, N., Khalatbari Moazam, M., & Hashemianzadeh, S. (2020). Meta-analysis of Antecedents of Knowledge Sharing in Iranian Organizations. Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 3(3), 113-145. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26454262.1399.3.3.4.8 [In Persian]
Babaee Farsani, M., & hasanimoghadam, S. (2020). A Though Model Based on the Views of the Supreme Leader: Mixed Method (Case Study: Imam Hossein University). Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 3(1), 65-101. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26454262.1399.3.1.2.2 [In Persian]
Bavik, Y.L., Tang, P.M., Shao, R., & Lam, L.W. (2018). Ethical leadership and employee knowledge sharing: Exploring dual-mediation paths. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 322-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.006
Bazargan, A. (2008). Introduction to Qualitative and Mixed Research Methods; Common Approaches in Behavioral Sciences. Tehran: Didar.
Biranvand, A., & Seif, M.H. (2019). The Effect of Effective Factors on Knowledge Sharing Intention. Rahyaft, 28(72), 47-60. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.10272690.1397.28.72.4.3 [In Persian]
Chopra, M., & Gupta, V. (2020). Linking knowledge management practices to organizational performance using the balanced scorecard approach. Kybernetes, 49(1), 88-115. https://doi.org/10.4018/jkm.2008010103
 Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Di Vaio, A., Palladino, R., Pezzi, A., & Kalisz, D.E. (2021). The role of digital innovation in knowledge management systems: A systematic literature review. Journal of business research, 123, 220-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.042
Edeh, F.O., Zayed, N.M., Nitsenko, V., Brezhnieva-Yermolenko, O., Negovska, J., & Shtan, M. (2022). Predicting innovation capability through knowledge management in the banking sector. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(7), 312. https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/7/312#
Fatahiyan, S., Makkizadeh, F., & Hazeri, A. (2022). Attitudes based on Knowledge Sharing and Analysis of Related Factors among Faculty Members of Yazd University in 2020. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 9(30), 119-137. https://jks.atu.ac.ir/article_13483.html?lang=en [In Persian]
Fathabadi, H., Khalghi, A., Dehghan Najmabadi, A., & Sajeghe, N. (2022). Investigating the effect of knowledge management and entrepreneurial orientation on technology transfer between industry and university (Case Study: Zamyad Company and University of Tehran). Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 5(3), 11-36. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26454262.1401.5.3.1.9 [In Persian]
Fauzi, M.A. (2023). Research vs. non-research universities: Knowledge sharing and research engagement among academicians. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(1), 25-39. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09719-4
Gaudencio, P., Coelho, A., & Ribeiro, N. (2021). The impact of CSR perceptions on workers’ turnover intentions: Exploring the supervisor exchange process and the role of perceived external prestige. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(4), 543-561. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2018-0330
Goldasteh, A., Homayoon Arya, S., & Maghsoudi, B. (2022). Structural modeling of factors affecting knowledge sharing among faculty members. Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 5(3), 37-67. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26454262.1401.5.3.2.0 [In Persian]
Goswami, A.K., & Agrawal, R.K. (2023). It’sa knowledge centric world! Does ethical leadership promote knowledge sharing and knowledge creation? Psychological capital as mediator and shared goals as moderator. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(3), 584-612. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2021-0669
Halisah, A., Jayasingam, S., Ramayah, T., & Popa, S. (2021). Social dilemmas in knowledge sharing: an examination of the interplay between knowledge sharing culture and performance climate. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(7), 1708-1725. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2020-0631
Hasirchi, A., Tavallaee, R., & Matini Motahar, M. (2021). Designing a Model for Extracting Individuals' Knowledge and Organizational Experiences at the Strategic Level. Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 3(4), 101-136. https://jkm.ihu.ac.ir/article_206017.html?lang=en [In Persian]
Hussein, A.R. (2011). Academic attitudes towards the use of mobile phone technologies for knowledge sharing in higher education institutions: An exploratory survey. American Academic & Scholarly Research Journal, 1(1), 6-9. http://aasrc.org/aasrj/index.php/aasrj/article/view/31
Inang, N.I. (2021). Effect Of Leadership and Work Motivation on Employee Performance Through Knowledge Sharing Behavior. Archives of Business Research, 9(11), 34-50. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.911.11067
Javaid, J., Soroya, S., & Mahmood, K. (2020). Impact of personal and organizational factors on knowledge sharing attitude of university teachers in Pakistan. The Electronic Library, 38(2), 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-05-2019-0121
Kang, Y.J., Lee, J.Y., & Kim, H.W. (2017). A psychological empowerment approach to online knowledge sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.039
Mahmoudi, M. R., & Pourghane P. (2020). Knowledge Sharing in University from the viewpoint of the Faculty Members. J Res Dev Nurs Midw, 17 (2), 15-19. URL: http://nmj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1102-en.html
Maponya, P.M. (2005). Fostering the culture of knowledge sharing in higher education. South African journal of higher education, 19(5), 900-911. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC37176
Nadason, S., Saad, R.A.J., & Ahmi, A. (2017). Knowledge sharing and barriers in organizations: A conceptual paper on knowledge-management strategy. Indian-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance, 1(4), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.52962/ipjaf.2017.1.4.26
Nguyen, T.M., Ngo, L.V., & Gregory, G. (2022). Motivation in organisational online knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(1), 102-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2020-0664
Nguyen, T.M., Nham, T.P., Froese, F.J., & Malik, A. (2019). Motivation and knowledge sharing: a meta-analysis of main and moderating effects. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(5), 998-1016. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2019-0029
Nouri, K.M., Nadi, M.A. (2019). Examining the Structural Relationship between Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation, Attitudes toward Knowledge Sharing, Perceived Behavioral Control, Subjective Norms, Intentions of Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Sharing Behavior. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Educational and Scholastic Studies, 8(20), 127-154. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2423494.1398.8.1.6.7 [In Persian]
Rajaei azarkhavarani Azarkhavarani, A., Rajaipour, S., Hoveida, R. (2016). A Study on Knowledge Sharing Behavior of Faculty Members of Isfahan Selected Universities. JMED, 9 (21), 37-46. URL: http://zums.ac.ir/edujournal/article-1-447-en.html [In Persian]
Salehi, M., & Sadeq Alanbari, S.A. (2023). Knowledge sharing barriers and knowledge sharing facilitators in innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2022-0702
Salimi, G., Sabbaghian, Z., DanaeeFard, H., & Abolghasemi, M. (2014). Conceptualizing Knowledge Sharing Process among Faculty Members in Academic Contexts: A Grounded Theory. Biennial Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 6(12), 9-38. https://scj.sbu.ac.ir/article_98394_3e2bc2fa1f5a67f61d345c9f73194ddd.pdf [In Persian]
Santosh, S., & Panda, S. (2016). Sharing of knowledge among faculty in a Mega open University. Open Praxis, 8(3), 247–264. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.283573633804143
Sasmita, E.E., Utam, H.N., & Ruhana, I. (2023). The mediating effect of job satisfaction and knowledge sharing behaviour on job performance. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v21i0.2128
Seif, M., Sabet Maharlouei, A., Rastegar, A., & Talebi, S. (2015).Factors Influencing the Willingness to Share Knowledge among Faculty Members of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical, 15, 41-50. URL: http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-3505-en.html [In Persian]
Sharei, Z., Ebrahimi, S.A., Damghanian, H., & Zare, A. (2020). Providing a Branding Model for Elite and top-Talented People with the Grounded Theory Approach. Public Management Researches, 12(46), 171-198. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2019.30447.4631 [In Persian]
Singh, S.K., Gupta, S., Busso, D., & Kamboj, S. (2021). Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 128, 788-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.040
Steiner, G. (2018). From probabilistic functionalism to a mental simulation of innovation: By collaboration from vulnerabilities to resilient societal systems: Comment on ‘Managing complexity: From visual perception to sustainable transitions–contributions of Brunswik’s Theory of Probabilistic Functionalism’. Environment Systems and Decisions, 38(1), 92-98. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10669-018-9674-9
Taheri Attar, G., Motavaseli, M.H., Khezri, S.E., & Namdar Joyami, E. (2018). The Relationship between Personal Information Management Motivation and Knowledge Sharing Objective: Considering the Role of Knowledge Management System Commitment (Faculty of Tehran University). Journal of Knowledge Studies, 11(43), 60-74. https://qje.ntb.iau.ir/article_676276.html?lang=en [In Persian]
Than, S.T., Le, P.B., & Le, T.T. (2023). The impacts of high-commitment HRM practices on exploitative and exploratory innovation: the mediating role of knowledge sharing. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 53(3), 430-449. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-10-2020-0196
Wu, Y., Hu, X., Wei, J., & Marinova, D. (2023). The effects of attitudes toward knowledge sharing, perceived social norms and job autonomy on employees’ knowledge-sharing intentions. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(7), 1889-1903. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2022-0468
 
 
 
Yasir, M., Majid, A., Yousaf, Z., Nassani, A.A., & Haffar, M. (2023). An integrative framework of innovative work behavior for employees in SMEs linking knowledge sharing, functional flexibility and psychological empowerment. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(2), 289-308. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2021-0091
Yu, X., & Meng, X. (2021). Intrinsic Motivation, Knowledge Sharing and Innovation Behavior of Knowledge-Based Employees in the Industrial New Generation. Converter, 3, 75-87.https://doi.org/10.17762/converter.38