ارائه الگوی تسهیم دانش در نهاد کتابخانه‌های عمومی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه خلیج‌فارس بوشهر، بوشهر، ایران.

2 گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکدگان مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده
در عصر کنونی، اهمیت دانش و فعالیت‌های دانش‌محور در هیچ سازمانی قابل‌انکار نیست. تمام سازمان‌ها دارای حجم بزرگی از اطلاعات هستند، اما استفاده کارآمد از این اطلاعات نیازمند داشتن نیروهای انسانی مجرب و متخصص است. این نیروها باید قادر باشند با داده‌های اطلاعاتی سازمان کار کنند و آنها را به‌صورت مؤثر به نفع سازمان بهره‌برداری کنند. هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر تسهیم دانش در نهاد کتابخانه‌های عمومی کشور و ارائه الگوی پیاده‌سازی تسهیم دانش در آن سازمان است. در این پژوهش، از یک رویکرد آمیخته استفاده شده است و از ابزارهای مختلف برای گردآوری اطلاعات استفاده شده است. این ابزارها شامل مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای، مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته و پرسش‌نامه بوده‌اند. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل مدیران، کارکنان اداری و رؤسای شهرستان‌ها در نهاد کتابخانه‌های عمومی کشور بوده است. نمونه پژوهش شامل 28 خبره انتخاب شده است و نمونه‌گیری به روش خوشه‌ای صورت گرفته است. نتایج فراترکیب منجر به شناسایی 80 کد، 12 شاخص و 4 بعد اصلی فناوری، فرهنگی، سازمانی، و فردی در پیاده‌سازی تسهیم دانش شد. نتایج نشان داد که بعد فرهنگی بیشترین تأثیر و بعد فناوری کمترین تأثیر را در پیاده‌سازی تسهیم دانش در نهاد کتابخانه‌های عمومی کشور دارد. درنهایت الگوی پیاده‌سازی تسهیم دانش در 5 سطح، که شاخص فرایندهای عملکردی، شاخص فرایندهای داخلی، شاخص فرایندهای راهبردی، و شاخص حس تعلق سازمانی تأثیرگذارترین و شاخص فرایندهای انتقال دانش تأثیرپذیرترین بودند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Providing a Model for Knowledge Sharing in the Iran Public Libraries Foundation

نویسندگان English

Saifallah Andayesh 1
zahra kianrad 2
1 Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran.
2 Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction
Knowledge has become one of the most valuable intangible assets and a critical source of competitive advantage for contemporary organizations. Effective knowledge management enables organizations to acquire, store, share, and apply knowledge to improve performance and ensure long-term sustainability. Among knowledge management processes, knowledge sharing is considered a fundamental component because knowledge that is not shared has limited organizational value. However, knowledge sharing is not an automatic process; rather, it requires individual motivation, organizational support, appropriate culture, and technological infrastructure. Knowledge sharing is particularly important in knowledge-based organizations such as public libraries, where employees possess valuable explicit and tacit knowledge gained through professional experiences. The National Library and Public Libraries Institution of Iran has accumulated extensive organizational experiences; however, the lack of systematic mechanisms for transferring knowledge, documenting lessons learned, and preserving employees’ expertise may result in knowledge loss due to retirement, employee turnover, and organizational changes. Therefore, identifying the factors influencing knowledge sharing and developing an appropriate model can contribute to improving organizational learning and knowledge sustainability. The present study aims to identify the key indicators affecting knowledge sharing implementation in the National Library and Public Libraries Institution of Iran, prioritize these indicators, and develop a comprehensive knowledge-sharing model.
Research Questions
1. What are the dimensions and indicators of knowledge sharing in the National Library and Public Libraries Institution of Iran?
2. How are the effective indicators of knowledge sharing in the National Library and Public Libraries Institution of Iran ranked?
3. What is the knowledge-sharing model in the National Library and Public Libraries Institution of Iran?
Literature Review
Previous studies have demonstrated that knowledge sharing is influenced by multiple dimensions, including technological, organizational, cultural, and individual factors. Research has shown that organizational trust, management support, employee participation, motivation, and organizational culture play significant roles in encouraging knowledge-sharing behaviors. Trust among employees facilitates the exchange of both tacit and explicit knowledge, while supportive leadership creates an environment in which employees are more willing to share their expertise. Furthermore, information technology provides essential infrastructure for knowledge storage, communication, and dissemination. However, technology alone cannot guarantee successful knowledge sharing unless it is supported by appropriate organizational processes and a knowledge-oriented culture. Studies conducted in libraries and other knowledge-intensive organizations emphasize the importance of developing structured processes, employee training, and incentive systems to promote knowledge-sharing practices. Despite previous research, limited studies have focused on developing a comprehensive knowledge-sharing model specifically for public libraries. Therefore, this study attempts to fill this research gap by identifying and integrating the major dimensions and indicators of knowledge sharing in the context of public libraries.
Methodology
This study employed a mixed-methods research design to identify, prioritize, and model knowledge-sharing indicators in the National Library and Public Libraries Institution of Iran. In the qualitative phase, a meta-synthesis approach based on the seven-step model of Sandelowski and Barroso was conducted. Relevant studies published from 1990 onward were reviewed through international and national databases. From 189 identified sources, 43 articles were selected after applying quality assessment and screening criteria. Based on the extracted indicators, an expert-based questionnaire was developed. Twenty-eight experts, including managers, administrative employees, provincial directors, and specialists from the National Library and Public Libraries Institution, participated in the study. The indicators were evaluated using the Delphi method and prioritized through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Subsequently, Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) was applied to develop the knowledge-sharing model, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using SmartPLS was employed to validate the final model.
Results
The findings revealed that 80 initial indicators were identified and categorized into four main dimensions: technological, organizational, cultural, and individual factors. After expert evaluation and Delphi analysis, 12 key indicators remained. The technological dimension included information technology management; the organizational dimension consisted of knowledge transfer processes, knowledge-sharing expertise, internal processes, strategic processes, and performance processes. The cultural dimension included management support, employee participation, and organizational belonging, while the individual dimension included employee understanding and awareness, employee and managerial expertise, and human resource motivation. The AHP results indicated that the cultural dimension had the highest importance in implementing knowledge sharing, followed by individual, organizational, and technological dimensions. The ISM analysis demonstrated that organizational processes, strategic processes, internal processes, and organizational belonging were among the most influential factors. The SEM results confirmed the appropriate fit and predictive capability of the proposed model.
Discussion
The results highlight that successful implementation of knowledge sharing requires more than technological solutions. Although information technology provides important support for knowledge exchange, organizational culture and human factors have a stronger influence on knowledge-sharing behaviors. The dominant role of cultural factors indicates that management support, trust, employee involvement, and organizational commitment are essential for creating an environment where knowledge sharing becomes part of daily organizational practices. Moreover, individual factors such as motivation, expertise, and employees’ understanding of the value of knowledge sharing significantly contribute to knowledge exchange. Managers should therefore develop incentive mechanisms, training programs, and communication opportunities to encourage employees to share their experiences. Organizational factors, including documentation processes, knowledge repositories, and strategic planning, are also necessary to ensure the sustainability of knowledge-sharing activities. For public libraries, where employees hold valuable professional knowledge and experiences, establishing systematic knowledge-sharing mechanisms can prevent knowledge loss and improve service quality.
Conclusion
This study developed a comprehensive model for implementing knowledge sharing in the National Library and Public Libraries Institution of Iran. The findings demonstrate that knowledge sharing is a multidimensional process influenced by cultural, individual, organizational, and technological factors. Among these dimensions, organizational culture and management support represent the most critical foundations for successful implementation. The proposed model can assist policymakers and managers in designing effective knowledge-sharing strategies, preserving organizational knowledge, and improving organizational performance. Future research may examine the effectiveness of this model in other knowledge-based organizations and investigate the long-term outcomes of knowledge-sharing initiatives.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Knowledge Sharing
Knowledge Management
Iran Public Libraries Foundation
Interpretive Structural Modeling
ارمغان، نگار. (1393). موانع فرهنگی در تسهیم دانش از منظر مدیریت تغییر. مدیریت توسعه فناوری، 2(4)، 85-108. https://doi.org/10.22104/jtdm.2016.217
الوانی، سیدمهدی، فضلی، صفر، و مهدیان‌راد، امیراحمد. (1398). ارائه مدل دینامیکی تسهیم دانش در سازمان امور مالیاتی کشور. پژوهش‌نامه مالیات، ۲۷ (۴۴)، ۱۲۷-۱۶۶. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/taxjournal.27.44.127
امیدپناه، علی، نایب‌زاده، شهناز، دهقان دهنوی، حسن، و اسلامی، حسین. (1400). ارائه الگویی برای تسهیم دانش در سازمان. دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی، 12(1)، 167-151. https://doi.org/10.30495/jedu.2021.22892.4636
انصاری، خداکرم، صالحی، اله‌کرم، و امیری، هوشنگ. (1400). ارائه مدل تسهیم دانش با استفاده از رویکرد مدیریت دانش (مطالعه موردی: مؤسسات حسابرسی شهر تهران). تحقیقات مدیریت استراتژیک، 82(27)، 63-108. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22285067.1400.27.82.3.6
آیت، مسرت، سلیمانی، مریم، و قندهاری، محمدتقی. (1402). نقش اعتماد به رهبری، اشتراک دانش و کیفیت سیستم‌های اطلاعاتی بر نوآوری و انگیزۀ کارکنان کتابخانه‌های عمومی. تحقیقات اطلاع‌رسانی و کتابخانه‌های عمومی، ۲۹ (۱)، ۱۲۸-۱۴۶. http://dx.doi.org/10.61186/publij.29.1.128
بیرانوند، علی، شعبانی، احمد، و محمدی استانی، مرتضی. (1396). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر تسهیم دانش کتابداران و ارائه مدل پیش‌بینی رفتار آنها (مطالعه موردی: کتابخانه‌های عمومی استان فارس). مطالعات کتابداری و علم اطلاعات، 9(19)، 39-60. https://doi.org/10.22055/slis.2017.11644
خراشادیزاده، محمدهادی، مهرمنش، حسن، و حقیقت منفرد، جلال. (1397). طراحی مدل تسهیم دانش در پروژه‌ها با رویکرد تحلیلی. مطالعات مدیریت کسب‌وکار هوشمند، 7(26)، 161-191. https://doi.org/10.22054/ims.2019.9720
سلیمانی، محمد، فیضی، جعفرصادق، پاشازاده، یوسف، و برزگر قره‌باغ، جعفر. (1391). بررسی نقش و میزان تأثیر فاکتورهای فردی کارکنان بر کیفیت تسهیم دانش (مطالعه موردی: اداره امور زندان‌ها و اقدامات تأمینی و تربیتی استان آذربایجان غربی). مدیریت توسعه و تحول، 4(11)، 73-81. https://journals.iau.ir/article_391.html
سهرابی، عاطفه، یزدخواستی، علی، و صادقی آرانی، زهرا. (1400). فراتحلیل عوامل سازمانی مؤثر بر تسهیم دانش سازمانی. علوم و فنون مدیریت اطلاعات، 7(3)، 277-322. https://doi.org/10.22091/stim.2020.6173.1471
شائمی برزکی، علی، کیان‌پور، مسعود، و شاکری، فاطمه. (1397). فرایند درون‌فردی مشارکت در تسهیم دانش. مطالعات مدیریت بهبود و تحول، 27(88)، 103-141. https://doi.org/10.22054/jmsd.2018.8929
صفایی، ناصر، طالقانی نیا، فرشته، و کیامنش، احمد. (1396). شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت مدیریت دانش در شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان (مطالعه موردی پارک علم و فناوری دانشگاه تهران). فصلنامه رشد و فناوری، 13(50)، 28-21. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17355486.1396.13.50.5.1
فاطمی‌نسب، سیدعزت‌اله، و محمودزاده، ابراهیم. (1396). بررسی تأثیر ارتباطات سازمانی بر تسهیم دانش در شرکت راه‌آهن جمهوری اسلامی ایران. مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی دفاع ملی، 1(1)، 72-109. https://issk.sndu.ac.ir/article_37.html
 فیلی، اردلان، ثابت، عباس، رستگارفر، بنفشه، و علی‌پور، سیما. (1398). ارائه مدل علی عوامل سازمانی مؤثر بر تسهیم دانش؛ مطالعه‌ای در شرکت ملی مناطق نفت‌خیز جنوب. مطالعات راهبردی در صنعت نفت و انرژی (مدیریت منابع انسانی در صنعت نفت)، 11(42)، 61-91. http://iieshrm.ir/article-1-812-fa.html
قاسمی، الهام، شاهی، سکینه، و مهرعلیزاده، یدالله. (1399). بررسی فرهنگ‌سازمانی پارسونز با به اشتراک‌گذاری دانش در سازمان آموزش‌وپرورش منطقه ارژن شیراز. دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی، 11(41)، 1-24. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20086369.1399.11.41.1.0
قهاری بیدگلی، سکینه، و تربتی‌نژاد، حسین. (1399). نقش فن‌آوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در نوآوری، خلاقیت و تسهیم دانش استادان دانشگاه فنی و حرفه‌ای شهید رجایی کاشان. توسعه حرفه‌ای معلم، 5(3)، 1-11. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24765600.1399.5.3.1.1
مهدوی، جعفر. (1403). رابطه بین فرهنگ‌سازمانی با تسهیم دانش در معلمان مقطع متوسطه شهرستان پاکدشت. آموزش مدارس در هزاره سوم، 2(1)، 32-22. https://doi.org/10.22034/JSETM.2024.454833.1032
References
Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., Hussain, S. T., & Puig, L. C. M. (2017). The effect of organizational justice on knowledge sharing: Empirical evidence from the Chinese telecommunications sector. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(3), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.09.002
Al-Busaidi, K. A., & Olfman, L. (2017). Knowledge sharing through inter-organizational knowledge sharing systems. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 47(1), 110–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-05-2016-0019
Alvarez, I., Zamanillo, I., & Cilleruelo, E. (2016). Have information technologies evolved towards accommodation of knowledge management needs in Basque SMEs? Technology in Society, 46, 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.04.006
Alvani, S. M., Fazli, S., & Mahdian Rad, A. A. (2020). Developing a dynamic model of knowledge sharing in Iranian National Tax Administration. Journal of Tax Research, 27(44), 127–166. https://doi.org/10.29252/taxjournal.27.44.127 [In Persian]
Ansari, K., Salehi, A. K., & Amiri, H. (2021). Presentation of a knowledge sharing model using a knowledge management approach (Case study: Audit institutes in Tehran City). Strategic Management Researches, 27(82), 63–108. [In Persian]
Armaghan, N. (2014). Cultural barriers in knowledge sharing from the perspective of change management. Technology Development Management, 2(4), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.22104/jtdm.2016.217 [In Persian]
Ayat, M., Soleimani, M., & Ghandehari, M. T. (2023). The role of trust in leadership, knowledge sharing and quality of information systems on innovation and motivation of public library staff. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 29(1), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.61186/publij.29.1.128 [In Persian]
Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900105
Biranvand, A., Shabani, A., & Mohammadi Astani, M. (2017). Investigating factors affecting knowledge-sharing librarians and introducing a model for predicting their behavior (Case study: Fars Province's public libraries). Library and Information Science Studies, 9(19), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.22055/slis.2017.11644 [In Persian]
Bose, R. (2004). Knowledge management metrics. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 104(6), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570410543771
Casimir, G., Lee, K., & Loon, M. (2012). Knowledge sharing: Influences of trust, commitment and cost. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(5), 740–753. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211262781
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., & Vrontis, D. (2022). Knowledge sharing in international markets for product and process innovation: Moderating role of firm's absorptive capacity. International Marketing Review, 39(3), 706–733. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-11-2020-0261
Chergui, W., Zidat, S., & Marir, F. (2020). An approach to the acquisition of tacit knowledge based on an ontological model. Journal of King Saud University Computer and Information Sciences, 32(7), 818–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.09.012
Chua, A., & Lam, W. (2005). Why KM projects fail: A multi-case analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602737
Deng, H., Duan, S. X., & Wibowo, S. (2023). Digital technology driven knowledge sharing for job performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(2), 404–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2021-0637
Deng, P., & Lu, H. (2022). Transnational knowledge transfer or indigenous knowledge transfer: Which channel has more benefits for China's high-tech enterprises? European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(2), 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2020-0269
Dulipovici, A., & Robey, D. (2013). Strategic alignment and misalignment of knowledge management systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290404
Fateminasab, S., & Mahmoudzadeh, E. (2017). A study the impact of organizational communication on knowledge sharing in the Islamic Republic of Iran Railway. Interdisciplinary Studies on Strategic Knowledge, 1(1), 72–109. [In Persian] https://issk.sndu.ac.ir/article_37.html
Feili, A., Sabet, A., Rastegarfar, B., & Alipour, S. (2020). Developing a causal model for organizational factors effecting on knowledge sharing (Case: The National Iranian South Oil Company). Strategic Studies in the Oil and Energy Industry, 11(42), 61–92. [In Persian]
Ghahari Bidgoli, S., & Torbatinezhad, H. (2020). The effect of information and communication technology on innovation, creativity, and knowledge sharing among faculty members of Shahid Rajaee Technical and Vocational University in Kashan. Teacher Professional Development, 5(3), 1–11. [In Persian]
Ghasemi, A., Shahi, S., & Mehralizadeh, Y. (2020). Examining the organizational culture of Parsons by sharing knowledge in the education organization of Arjan Shiraz region. Bimonthly Scientific-Research Journal of a New Approach in Educational Management, 11(41), 1–24. [In Persian]
Hu, Y., Hou, J., & Chien, C. (2018). A framework for knowledge management of university–industry collaboration and an illustration. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 129, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.072
Islam, T., Ahmed, I., Usman, A., & Ali, M. (2021). Abusive supervision and knowledge hiding: The moderating roles of future orientation and Islamic work ethics. Management Research Review, 44(12), 1565–1582. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2020-0348
Ismail, M. B., & Yusof, Z. M. (2010). The impact of individual factors on knowledge sharing quality. Journal of Organizational Knowledge Management, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5171/2010.327569
Khorashadizadeh, M., Mehrmanesh, H., & Hechit Monfared, J. (2019). Designing a knowledge sharing model in projects with an analytical approach. Smart Business Management Studies, 7(26), 161–191. https://doi.org/10.22054/ims.2019.9720 [In Persian]
Le, P. B., Lei, H., Le, T. T., Gong, J., & Ha, A. T. (2020). Developing a collaborative culture for radical and incremental innovation: The mediating roles of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. Chinese Management Studies, 14(4), 957–975. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-04-2019-0151
Liao, S. H., & Hu, T. C. (2007). Knowledge transfer and competitive advantage on environmental uncertainty: An empirical study of the Taiwan semiconductor industry. Technovation, 27(6-7), 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.02.005
Llopis, O., & Foss, N. J. (2016). Understanding the climate–knowledge sharing relation: The moderating roles of intrinsic motivation and job autonomy. European Management Journal, 34(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.11.009
Mahdavi, J. (2024). The relationship between organizational culture and knowledge sharing among middle school teachers in Pakdasht city. School Education in the Third Millennium, 2(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.22034/JSETM.2024.454833.1032 [In Persian]
Mehmood, M. S., Jian, Z., Akram, U., Akram, Z., & Tanveer, Y. (2022). Entrepreneurial leadership and team creativity: The roles of team psychological safety and knowledge sharing. Personnel Review, 51(9), 2404–2425. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2020-0517
Nguyen, T.-M. (2021). Four-dimensional model: A literature review in online organisational knowledge sharing. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 51(1), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-05-2019-0077
Nikhil, M., & Dianne, H. (2014). Information technology and knowledge in software development teams: The role of project uncertainty. Information & Management, 51(4), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.12.006
Nirmal Pal, N., Sundaresan, S., Ray, J., Bhargava, H., Glantz, E., & McHugh, M. (2004). Knowledge Quotient™ (KQ): A way to measure the knowledge intensity of your team. The Penn State eBusiness Research Center.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
Olatokun, W., & Njideaka, T. M.-A. (2020). Knowledge sharing practices among cataloguers in Nigeria's academic libraries. Library Management, 41(4/5), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-12-2019-0090
Omidpanah, A., Naibzadeh, S., Dehghan Dehnavi, H., & Eslami, H. (2021). Providing a model for sharing knowledge in the organization. Bimonthly Scientific-Research Journal of a New Approach in Educational Management, 12(1), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.30495/jedu.2021.22892.4636 [In Persian]
Oyemomi, O., Liu, S., Neaga, I., Chen, H., & Nakpodia, F. (2019). How cultural impact on knowledge sharing contributes to organizational performance: Using the fsQCA approach. Journal of Business Research, 94, 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.027
Rotsios, K. P., Sklavounos, N. S., & Hajidimitriou, Y. A. (2014). Trust, knowledge transfer and control in IJVs: The case of four Greek firms. Procedia Economics and Finance, 9, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00024-0
Safae, N., Taleqani Nia, A., & Kiamanesh, A. (2017). Identifying and ranking the key success factors of knowledge management in knowledge-based companies (A case study of Science and Technology Park of Tehran University). Growth and Technology Quarterly, 13(50), 21–28. [In Persian]
Shaimi Barzeki, A., Kianpour, M., & Shakri, F. (2018). The intra-individual process of participation in knowledge sharing. Improvement and Transformation Management Studies, 27(88), 103–141. https://doi.org/10.22054/jmsd.2018.8929 [In Persian]
Singh, S. K., Gupta, S., Busso, D., & Kamboj, S. (2021). Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 128, 788–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.040
Sohrabi, A., Yazdakhasi, A., & Sadeghi Arani, Z. (2021). Meta-analysis of organizational factors affecting organizational knowledge sharing. Information Management Sciences and Techniques, 7(3), 277–322. https://doi.org/10.22091/stim.2020.6173.1471 [In Persian]
Soleimani, M., Sadegh Faizi, J., Pashazadeh, Y., & Barzegar Karabagh, J. (2011). Investigating the role and extent of the impact of individual factors of employees on the quality of knowledge sharing (Case study: Department of Prisons Affairs and Security and Educational Measures of West Azarbaijan Province). Development and Transformation Management Quarterly, 11(4), 73–81. [In Persian]
Taylor, W. A., & Wright, G. H. (2004). Organizational readiness for successful knowledge sharing: Challenges for public sector managers. Information Resources Management Journal, 17(2), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2004040102
Tea Moon, K. (2015). The effects of organizational justice on the knowledge sharing and utilization in hotel firms. Journal of Tourism Research, 40(4), 41–59.
Wang, S., & Noe, R. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
Yeboah, A. (2023). Knowledge sharing in organization: A systematic review. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), Article 2195027. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2195027
Zhang, X., & Venkatesh, V. (2017). A nomological network of knowledge management system use: Antecedents and consequences. MIS Quarterly, 41(4), 1275–1306. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26630294